Re: flatpak
- I can't export my files - latex is there but postscipt files won't be processed (epstopdf probably missing) You are right, the EPS conversion does not work. I'll fix it. El mié, 10 ene 2024 a la(s) 8:35 a.m., T Rex (sixpa...@gmail.com) escribió: > The package has permission to access documents and all work should be done > in that directory. Access permissions can be changed as needed by the > user with commands or with flatseal. > > Additionally, because I was not given permission to access the /tpm > directory (maybe I am not explaining it well), the temporary files must be > stored in a documents directory so that they can be accessible, the > directory must have been created ( documents/.tpmlyx). It is necessary to > view the PDFs, lyx must be configured to store its temporary files in a > document directory. > > Flatpaks in general can make requests to open files but if they are in the > sanbox they cannot be viewed. In my case, when I click on View, a window > opens where it allows me to select any installed PDF viewer. > > The tests I have done are based on running the files in help. I will > review the concerns raised. > > (this is a translation) > > El mié, 10 ene 2024 a la(s) 4:31 a.m., Pavel Sanda (sa...@lyx.org) > escribió: > >> On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 05:11:49PM -0500, T Rex wrote: >> > org.kde.Platform contains the libQt5X11Extras.so.5 library. I guess the >> > error is that org.kde.Platform is not installed. >> >> I do have org.kde.Platform. So I figured I was launching lyx incorrectly >> and it runs now. >> Loaded random file of mine and I see several issues: >> - when trying to view pdf, won't be processed (latex error: cannot >> determine size of graphics in figs/...) >> - neither bibliography is found. >> >> Maybe I am not allowed to load my documents in normal home? I see that >> the file is actually opened in >> some /run/user/ sandbox. Can this be allowed? >> >> So I tried to create new simple file: >> - I can't export my files - latex is there but postscipt files won't be >> processed (epstopdf probably missing) >> - I can't see pdf ouput (perhaps some pdfviewer should be part of the >> dependencies?); (same proably for html output, but that may be left on >> user's choice if he wants to add it) >> >> Pavel >> > -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: flatpak
The package has permission to access documents and all work should be done in that directory. Access permissions can be changed as needed by the user with commands or with flatseal. Additionally, because I was not given permission to access the /tpm directory (maybe I am not explaining it well), the temporary files must be stored in a documents directory so that they can be accessible, the directory must have been created ( documents/.tpmlyx). It is necessary to view the PDFs, lyx must be configured to store its temporary files in a document directory. Flatpaks in general can make requests to open files but if they are in the sanbox they cannot be viewed. In my case, when I click on View, a window opens where it allows me to select any installed PDF viewer. The tests I have done are based on running the files in help. I will review the concerns raised. (this is a translation) El mié, 10 ene 2024 a la(s) 4:31 a.m., Pavel Sanda (sa...@lyx.org) escribió: > On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 05:11:49PM -0500, T Rex wrote: > > org.kde.Platform contains the libQt5X11Extras.so.5 library. I guess the > > error is that org.kde.Platform is not installed. > > I do have org.kde.Platform. So I figured I was launching lyx incorrectly > and it runs now. > Loaded random file of mine and I see several issues: > - when trying to view pdf, won't be processed (latex error: cannot > determine size of graphics in figs/...) > - neither bibliography is found. > > Maybe I am not allowed to load my documents in normal home? I see that the > file is actually opened in > some /run/user/ sandbox. Can this be allowed? > > So I tried to create new simple file: > - I can't export my files - latex is there but postscipt files won't be > processed (epstopdf probably missing) > - I can't see pdf ouput (perhaps some pdfviewer should be part of the > dependencies?); (same proably for html output, but that may be left on > user's choice if he wants to add it) > > Pavel > -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: flatpak
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 05:11:49PM -0500, T Rex wrote: > org.kde.Platform contains the libQt5X11Extras.so.5 library. I guess the > error is that org.kde.Platform is not installed. I do have org.kde.Platform. So I figured I was launching lyx incorrectly and it runs now. Loaded random file of mine and I see several issues: - when trying to view pdf, won't be processed (latex error: cannot determine size of graphics in figs/...) - neither bibliography is found. Maybe I am not allowed to load my documents in normal home? I see that the file is actually opened in some /run/user/ sandbox. Can this be allowed? So I tried to create new simple file: - I can't export my files - latex is there but postscipt files won't be processed (epstopdf probably missing) - I can't see pdf ouput (perhaps some pdfviewer should be part of the dependencies?); (same proably for html output, but that may be left on user's choice if he wants to add it) Pavel -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: flatpak
In the case of a clean installation from flathub, 1. org.freedesktop.Platform.GL.default 23.08 i flathub< 162.2 MB 2. org.freedesktop.Platform.GL.default 23.08-extra i flathub< 162.2 MB 3. org.freedesktop.Platform.openh264 2.2.0 i flathub< 944.3 kB 4. org.freedesktop.Sdk.Extension.texlive 23.08 i flathub < 5.4 GB 5. org.kde.KStyle.Adwaita 5.15-23.08 i flathub < 6.6 MB 6. org.kde.Platform.Locale 5.15-23.08 i flathub< 381.6 MB 7. org.kde.Platform 5.15-23.08 i flathub< 334.4 MB 8. org.lyx.LyX.Locale stable i flathub < 4.7 MB 9. org.lyx.LyX stable i flathub < 47.9 MB org.kde.Platform contains the libQt5X11Extras.so.5 library. I guess the error is that org.kde.Platform is not installed. Note: Although it seems that they are 5G download for texlive, my system showed around 9G. El mar, 9 ene 2024 a la(s) 4:38 p.m., Pavel Sanda (sa...@lyx.org) escribió: > On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 01:45:00PM -0500, T Rex wrote: > > I tested the package and it worked. now uninstall and install everything > > again and it still works in debian. I'm going to try a clean installation > > with wayland in kde plasma to try to reproduce the error. Do you use > > wayland? > > No, i'm on debian bullseye with Xorg if it matters. > I installed into fresh new flatpack repository (no > previous dependencies were installed). > > Pavel > -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: flatpak
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 01:45:00PM -0500, T Rex wrote: > I tested the package and it worked. now uninstall and install everything > again and it still works in debian. I'm going to try a clean installation > with wayland in kde plasma to try to reproduce the error. Do you use > wayland? No, i'm on debian bullseye with Xorg if it matters. I installed into fresh new flatpack repository (no previous dependencies were installed). Pavel -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: flatpak
I tested the package and it worked. now uninstall and install everything again and it still works in debian. I'm going to try a clean installation with wayland in kde plasma to try to reproduce the error. Do you use wayland? Was org.kde.Plataform//5.15-23.08 installed? It should have been installed automatically El mar, 9 ene 2024 a la(s) 7:00 a.m., Pavel Sanda (sa...@lyx.org) escribió: > On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 08:41:00PM -0500, T Rex wrote: > > Hello, I think the package is quite advanced. Of the features mentioned, > I > > need to incorporate docbook, the problem is that the sources produce > errors > > when compiling them, patches must be applied. I have added via plugins to > > lilypond and sweave/knitr, it seems like the best to me. > > Beware that docbook make sense mainly with upcoming 2.4, the 2.3 output > is archaic in this regard (and not worth to support IMHO). > > > As for sweave/knitr, I really don't know if it is necessary to install > > additional R packages, it surely is. If that is the case I suppose it > > should be necessary to install a compiler. > > > > Reviewers mentioned that the appdata.xml file was incomplete, so I used a > > different one. Although you may not be able to use a generic one due to > the > > customization of the information that must be provided regarding the > > contents of the package. > > I tried to install the flatpak from flathub and it fails to run due to > missing > Qt dependcy (libQt5X11Extras.so.5) > > Pavel > -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: flatpak
On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 08:41:00PM -0500, T Rex wrote: > Hello, I think the package is quite advanced. Of the features mentioned, I > need to incorporate docbook, the problem is that the sources produce errors > when compiling them, patches must be applied. I have added via plugins to > lilypond and sweave/knitr, it seems like the best to me. Beware that docbook make sense mainly with upcoming 2.4, the 2.3 output is archaic in this regard (and not worth to support IMHO). > As for sweave/knitr, I really don't know if it is necessary to install > additional R packages, it surely is. If that is the case I suppose it > should be necessary to install a compiler. > > Reviewers mentioned that the appdata.xml file was incomplete, so I used a > different one. Although you may not be able to use a generic one due to the > customization of the information that must be provided regarding the > contents of the package. I tried to install the flatpak from flathub and it fails to run due to missing Qt dependcy (libQt5X11Extras.so.5) Pavel -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: flatpak
Hello, I think the package is quite advanced. Of the features mentioned, I need to incorporate docbook, the problem is that the sources produce errors when compiling them, patches must be applied. I have added via plugins to lilypond and sweave/knitr, it seems like the best to me. As for sweave/knitr, I really don't know if it is necessary to install additional R packages, it surely is. If that is the case I suppose it should be necessary to install a compiler. Reviewers mentioned that the appdata.xml file was incomplete, so I used a different one. Although you may not be able to use a generic one due to the customization of the information that must be provided regarding the contents of the package. El mar, 28 nov 2023 a la(s) 12:34 p.m., Pavel Sanda (sa...@lyx.org) escribió: > On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 11:03:02PM -0500, T Rex wrote: > > I have sent the add request to flathub. The compilations I have made have > > been successful, however I have had to make some unexpected maneuvers to > > allow the program to function correctly, such as editing lyxrc.defaults. > I > > don't know if there is a better way. Without the modification the buttons > > to build and view are blocked. > > Here you can find the manifest and other files: > > https://github.com/bztd/flathub/tree/org.lyx.LyX > > I remain attentive to any ideas, suggestions or opinions. > > I was considering flatpacking some time ago. The problem with LyX is that > its extremely dependent on many other external utilities to work well. > And it seemed to me that it's difficult to make all that work well. > I will be happy if you prove me wrong. > > Sure, you can compile it, but whether that makes that system useful > is altogether different thing. So if you put that on flathub, please > make clear it's limitations, so people know what works and it's not > equivalent to properly packaged version within standard distributions. > > Things to test out of my pocket: > - python > - TeXLive / common packages > - docbook > - image conversion via imagemagick > - svg conversion (either inkscape or rsvg-convert needed) > - some pdf and html viewer should be available > - literate prigramming (sweave/knitr) > - many other esoteric things need not to be present but > at least one could indicate it's missing (lilypond for musical > notation, gnumeric for sheets, maxima for evaluating math,, rcs/git > for version control, etc > > Pavel > -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: flatpak
Since my use of lyx is not very advanced, I had not worried about that. You are right, regarding the characteristics you mention, I think that their incorporation should not present any problems, it will only slightly inflate the package that is currently 30M for my system without obviously having the environment with texlive. El mar, 28 nov 2023 a la(s) 07:20, T Rex (sixpa...@gmail.com) escribió: > I think it builds satisfactorily, if you want to try: > > flatpak install --user > https://dl.flathub.org/build-repo/66570/org.lyx.LyX.flatpakref > I remain attentive to suggestions. > On the other hand, is there anyone who would like to have write permissions > for the repository on github to mention it?@jakobjakobson13 seems to be more > aware of the progress of the project, I suppose he is the right person to > handle the issue of updates. > This is the petition page, > > https://github.com/flathub/flathub/pull/4730 > > > El dom, 26 nov 2023 a la(s) 10:47, T Rex (sixpa...@gmail.com) escribió: > >> In fact, I am doing a more exhaustive search, but I think one of the >> problems is that the configuration avoids making system calls to open a >> file because in the system scan it did not find a program that could manage >> it. >> >> El sáb, 25 nov 2023 a la(s) 23:48, Richard Kimberly Heck ( >> rikih...@gmail.com) escribió: >> >>> On 11/25/23 23:03, T Rex wrote: >>> >>> I have sent the add request to flathub. The compilations I have made >>> have been successful, however I have had to make some unexpected maneuvers >>> to allow the program to function correctly, such as editing lyxrc.defaults. >>> I >>> don't know if there is a better way. Without the modification the >>> buttons to build and view are blocked. >>> Here you can find the manifest and other files: >>> https://github.com/bztd/flathub/tree/org.lyx.LyX >>> I remain attentive to any ideas, suggestions or opinions. >>> >>> It's fine to edit lyxrc.defaults, I think. This is basically a normal >>> thing for distributions to do, though there may be some better way to do >>> it. Perhaps someone else will know. >>> >>> What changes did you make, out of curiosity? >>> >>> Riki >>> >>> >>> >>> El vie, 24 nov 2023 a la(s) 13:33, T Rex (sixpa...@gmail.com) escribió: >>> Ready, thank you very much for the prompt response, when I have a functional version I will submit the request and I will send the links if I am successful. El vie, 24 nov 2023 a la(s) 13:27, Richard Kimberly Heck ( rikih...@gmail.com) escribió: > On 11/24/23 11:15, T Rex wrote: > > good day everyone, my apologies in advance if this is not the correct > channel to do the following: as Lyx is not available on flathub, I would > like to create the manifest so that it is available there, in any case the > original sources are used, is there any Problem with performing that > action? > > First, the GPL license surely allows it, so long as you make the > source code available (which is obviously not a problem). Second, I can't > imagine that any of us would object. Indeed, if you do go ahead, please > send us the link, so we can add it to the download section of our website. > > Perhaps we should even include the manifest in our git codebase > somewhere? That would need a bit more discussion. > > Riki > > >>> -- >>> >>> Richard Kimberly (Riki) Heck >>> Professor of Philosophy >>> Brown University >>> >>> Pronouns: they/them/their >>> Website: http://rkheck.frege.org/ >>> >>> -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: flatpak
I think it builds satisfactorily, if you want to try: flatpak install --user https://dl.flathub.org/build-repo/66570/org.lyx.LyX.flatpakref I remain attentive to suggestions. On the other hand, is there anyone who would like to have write permissions for the repository on github to mention it?@jakobjakobson13 seems to be more aware of the progress of the project, I suppose he is the right person to handle the issue of updates. This is the petition page, https://github.com/flathub/flathub/pull/4730 El dom, 26 nov 2023 a la(s) 10:47, T Rex (sixpa...@gmail.com) escribió: > In fact, I am doing a more exhaustive search, but I think one of the > problems is that the configuration avoids making system calls to open a > file because in the system scan it did not find a program that could manage > it. > > El sáb, 25 nov 2023 a la(s) 23:48, Richard Kimberly Heck ( > rikih...@gmail.com) escribió: > >> On 11/25/23 23:03, T Rex wrote: >> >> I have sent the add request to flathub. The compilations I have made >> have been successful, however I have had to make some unexpected maneuvers >> to allow the program to function correctly, such as editing lyxrc.defaults. I >> don't know if there is a better way. Without the modification the >> buttons to build and view are blocked. >> Here you can find the manifest and other files: >> https://github.com/bztd/flathub/tree/org.lyx.LyX >> I remain attentive to any ideas, suggestions or opinions. >> >> It's fine to edit lyxrc.defaults, I think. This is basically a normal >> thing for distributions to do, though there may be some better way to do >> it. Perhaps someone else will know. >> >> What changes did you make, out of curiosity? >> >> Riki >> >> >> >> El vie, 24 nov 2023 a la(s) 13:33, T Rex (sixpa...@gmail.com) escribió: >> >>> Ready, thank you very much for the prompt response, when I have a >>> functional version I will submit the request and I will send the links if I >>> am successful. >>> >>> El vie, 24 nov 2023 a la(s) 13:27, Richard Kimberly Heck ( >>> rikih...@gmail.com) escribió: >>> On 11/24/23 11:15, T Rex wrote: good day everyone, my apologies in advance if this is not the correct channel to do the following: as Lyx is not available on flathub, I would like to create the manifest so that it is available there, in any case the original sources are used, is there any Problem with performing that action? First, the GPL license surely allows it, so long as you make the source code available (which is obviously not a problem). Second, I can't imagine that any of us would object. Indeed, if you do go ahead, please send us the link, so we can add it to the download section of our website. Perhaps we should even include the manifest in our git codebase somewhere? That would need a bit more discussion. Riki >> -- >> >> Richard Kimberly (Riki) Heck >> Professor of Philosophy >> Brown University >> >> Pronouns: they/them/their >> Website: http://rkheck.frege.org/ >> >> -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: flatpak
On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 11:03:02PM -0500, T Rex wrote: > I have sent the add request to flathub. The compilations I have made have > been successful, however I have had to make some unexpected maneuvers to > allow the program to function correctly, such as editing lyxrc.defaults. I > don't know if there is a better way. Without the modification the buttons > to build and view are blocked. > Here you can find the manifest and other files: > https://github.com/bztd/flathub/tree/org.lyx.LyX > I remain attentive to any ideas, suggestions or opinions. I was considering flatpacking some time ago. The problem with LyX is that its extremely dependent on many other external utilities to work well. And it seemed to me that it's difficult to make all that work well. I will be happy if you prove me wrong. Sure, you can compile it, but whether that makes that system useful is altogether different thing. So if you put that on flathub, please make clear it's limitations, so people know what works and it's not equivalent to properly packaged version within standard distributions. Things to test out of my pocket: - python - TeXLive / common packages - docbook - image conversion via imagemagick - svg conversion (either inkscape or rsvg-convert needed) - some pdf and html viewer should be available - literate prigramming (sweave/knitr) - many other esoteric things need not to be present but at least one could indicate it's missing (lilypond for musical notation, gnumeric for sheets, maxima for evaluating math,, rcs/git for version control, etc Pavel -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: flatpak
Op 26-11-2023 om 05:48 schreef Richard Kimberly Heck: It's fine to edit lyxrc.defaults, I think. This is basically a normal thing for distributions to do, though there may be some better way to do it. Perhaps someone else will know. I use lyxrc.dist for distribution specific settings. Cor -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: flatpak
In fact, I am doing a more exhaustive search, but I think one of the problems is that the configuration avoids making system calls to open a file because in the system scan it did not find a program that could manage it. El sáb, 25 nov 2023 a la(s) 23:48, Richard Kimberly Heck (rikih...@gmail.com) escribió: > On 11/25/23 23:03, T Rex wrote: > > I have sent the add request to flathub. The compilations I have made have > been successful, however I have had to make some unexpected maneuvers to > allow the program to function correctly, such as editing lyxrc.defaults. I > don't know if there is a better way. Without the modification the buttons > to build and view are blocked. > Here you can find the manifest and other files: > https://github.com/bztd/flathub/tree/org.lyx.LyX > I remain attentive to any ideas, suggestions or opinions. > > It's fine to edit lyxrc.defaults, I think. This is basically a normal > thing for distributions to do, though there may be some better way to do > it. Perhaps someone else will know. > > What changes did you make, out of curiosity? > > Riki > > > > El vie, 24 nov 2023 a la(s) 13:33, T Rex (sixpa...@gmail.com) escribió: > >> Ready, thank you very much for the prompt response, when I have a >> functional version I will submit the request and I will send the links if I >> am successful. >> >> El vie, 24 nov 2023 a la(s) 13:27, Richard Kimberly Heck ( >> rikih...@gmail.com) escribió: >> >>> On 11/24/23 11:15, T Rex wrote: >>> >>> good day everyone, my apologies in advance if this is not the correct >>> channel to do the following: as Lyx is not available on flathub, I would >>> like to create the manifest so that it is available there, in any case the >>> original sources are used, is there any Problem with performing that >>> action? >>> >>> First, the GPL license surely allows it, so long as you make the source >>> code available (which is obviously not a problem). Second, I can't imagine >>> that any of us would object. Indeed, if you do go ahead, please send us the >>> link, so we can add it to the download section of our website. >>> >>> Perhaps we should even include the manifest in our git codebase >>> somewhere? That would need a bit more discussion. >>> >>> Riki >>> >>> > -- > > Richard Kimberly (Riki) Heck > Professor of Philosophy > Brown University > > Pronouns: they/them/their > Website: http://rkheck.frege.org/ > > -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: flatpak
On 11/25/23 23:03, T Rex wrote: I have sent the add request to flathub. The compilations I have made have been successful, however I have had to make some unexpected maneuvers to allow the program to function correctly, such as editing lyxrc.defaults. I don't know if there is a better way.Without the modification the buttons to build and view are blocked. Here you can find the manifest and other files: https://github.com/bztd/flathub/tree/org.lyx.LyX I remain attentive to any ideas, suggestions or opinions. It's fine to edit lyxrc.defaults, I think. This is basically a normal thing for distributions to do, though there may be some better way to do it. Perhaps someone else will know. What changes did you make, out of curiosity? Riki El vie, 24 nov 2023 a la(s) 13:33, T Rex (sixpa...@gmail.com) escribió: Ready, thank you very much for the prompt response, when I have a functional version I will submit the request and I will send the links if I am successful. El vie, 24 nov 2023 a la(s) 13:27, Richard Kimberly Heck (rikih...@gmail.com) escribió: On 11/24/23 11:15, T Rex wrote: good day everyone, my apologies in advance if this is not the correct channel to do the following: as Lyx is not available on flathub, I would like to create the manifest so that it is available there, in any case the original sources are used, is there any Problem with performing that action? First, the GPL license surely allows it, so long as you make the source code available (which is obviously not a problem). Second, I can't imagine that any of us would object. Indeed, if you do go ahead, please send us the link, so we can add it to the download section of our website. Perhaps we should even include the manifest in our git codebase somewhere? That would need a bit more discussion. Riki -- Richard Kimberly (Riki) Heck Professor of Philosophy Brown University Pronouns: they/them/their Website:http://rkheck.frege.org/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: flatpak
I have sent the add request to flathub. The compilations I have made have been successful, however I have had to make some unexpected maneuvers to allow the program to function correctly, such as editing lyxrc.defaults. I don't know if there is a better way. Without the modification the buttons to build and view are blocked. Here you can find the manifest and other files: https://github.com/bztd/flathub/tree/org.lyx.LyX I remain attentive to any ideas, suggestions or opinions. El vie, 24 nov 2023 a la(s) 13:33, T Rex (sixpa...@gmail.com) escribió: > Ready, thank you very much for the prompt response, when I have a > functional version I will submit the request and I will send the links if I > am successful. > > El vie, 24 nov 2023 a la(s) 13:27, Richard Kimberly Heck ( > rikih...@gmail.com) escribió: > >> On 11/24/23 11:15, T Rex wrote: >> >> good day everyone, my apologies in advance if this is not the correct >> channel to do the following: as Lyx is not available on flathub, I would >> like to create the manifest so that it is available there, in any case the >> original sources are used, is there any Problem with performing that >> action? >> >> First, the GPL license surely allows it, so long as you make the source >> code available (which is obviously not a problem). Second, I can't imagine >> that any of us would object. Indeed, if you do go ahead, please send us the >> link, so we can add it to the download section of our website. >> >> Perhaps we should even include the manifest in our git codebase >> somewhere? That would need a bit more discussion. >> >> Riki >> >> -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: flatpak
Ready, thank you very much for the prompt response, when I have a functional version I will submit the request and I will send the links if I am successful. El vie, 24 nov 2023 a la(s) 13:27, Richard Kimberly Heck (rikih...@gmail.com) escribió: > On 11/24/23 11:15, T Rex wrote: > > good day everyone, my apologies in advance if this is not the correct > channel to do the following: as Lyx is not available on flathub, I would > like to create the manifest so that it is available there, in any case the > original sources are used, is there any Problem with performing that > action? > > First, the GPL license surely allows it, so long as you make the source > code available (which is obviously not a problem). Second, I can't imagine > that any of us would object. Indeed, if you do go ahead, please send us the > link, so we can add it to the download section of our website. > > Perhaps we should even include the manifest in our git codebase somewhere? > That would need a bit more discussion. > > Riki > > -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: flatpak
On 11/24/23 11:15, T Rex wrote: good day everyone, my apologies in advance if this is not the correct channel to do the following: as Lyx is not available on flathub, I would like to create the manifest so that it is available there, in any case the original sources are used, is there any Problem with performing that action? First, the GPL license surely allows it, so long as you make the source code available (which is obviously not a problem). Second, I can't imagine that any of us would object. Indeed, if you do go ahead, please send us the link, so we can add it to the download section of our website. Perhaps we should even include the manifest in our git codebase somewhere? That would need a bit more discussion. Riki -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: flatpak
Il giorno ven 24 nov 2023 alle ore 18:24 T Rex ha scritto: > > good day everyone, my apologies in advance if this is not the correct channel > to do the following: as Lyx is not available on flathub, I would like to > create the manifest so that it is available there, in any case the original > sources are used, is there any Problem with performing that action? > -- > lyx-devel mailing list > lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org > http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel Not a dev, just wanted to chime in to say that i would be cool to have an officially supported flatpak, as to have the checkmark on flathub. Relevant bugtracker ticket from a year ago https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/11143. If you manage to get a flatpak working it could be a starting point. Lorenzo -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
