lfun documentation

2005-06-09 Thread G. Milde
On 8.06.05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: G == G Milde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: G ... all the lfuns should have some usage doc (telling the G expected arguments). docstrings are gone in 1.4.0cvs. They were actually tooltips for the toolbar. Not only. They were also used by Christian to

Auto generation of lfun wiki page (was: lfun documentation)

2005-06-09 Thread chr
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, G. Milde wrote: On 8.06.05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: G == G Milde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: G ... all the lfuns should have some usage doc (telling the G expected arguments). docstrings are gone in 1.4.0cvs. They were actually tooltips for the toolbar.

Re: Auto generation of lfun wiki page

2005-06-09 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
chr == chr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: chr Going off on a slight tangent, what if we put some cursory chr documentation of the lfuns in the *source* code using wiki chr markup? Then I could write a simple script that periodically chr extracts that markup and inserts it into some suitable wiki chr

Re: Auto generation of lfun wiki page (was: lfun documentation)

2005-06-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, G. Milde wrote: On 8.06.05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: G == G Milde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: G ... all the lfuns should have some usage doc (telling the G expected arguments). docstrings are gone in 1.4.0cvs. They were actually

lfun documentation

2005-06-09 Thread G. Milde
On 8.06.05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "G" == G Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > G> ... all the lfuns should have some usage doc (telling the > G> expected arguments). > > docstrings are gone in 1.4.0cvs. They were actually tooltips for the > toolbar. Not only. They were also used

Auto generation of lfun wiki page (was: lfun documentation)

2005-06-09 Thread chr
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, G. Milde wrote: > On 8.06.05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > "G" == G Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > G> ... all the lfuns should have some usage doc (telling the > > G> expected arguments). > > > > docstrings are gone in 1.4.0cvs. They were actually tooltips

Re: Auto generation of lfun wiki page

2005-06-09 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "chr" == chr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: chr> Going off on a slight tangent, what if we put some cursory chr> documentation of the lfuns in the *source* code using wiki chr> markup? Then I could write a simple script that periodically chr> extracts that markup and inserts it into some

Re: Auto generation of lfun wiki page (was: lfun documentation)

2005-06-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, G. Milde wrote: > >> On 8.06.05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> > > "G" == G Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > G> ... all the lfuns should have some usage doc (telling the >> > G> expected arguments). >> > >> > docstrings are gone in