Ran == Ran Rutenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ran Hi, Due to the comments made by some people to whom I showed the
Ran Introduction, I decided to change the header style of the
Ran document. After the modification, the header looks better in
Ran Hebrew and fits the styles used in Hebrew books
Recent wiki posts:
(http://wiki.lyx.org/Field/AllRecentChanges)
(http://wiki.lyx.org/devel/pmwiki.php/Field/AllRecentChanges)
* http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/ProducedPublications - 18:16 8/11 by Steve Mueller
Greetings,
I use LyX a lot, and I recently tried to implement a new layout. I've
found that either Lyx itself has bugs, or the manual on customization is
terribly wrong. I have already entered two bugs as 2972 and 2973. I'm
wondering whether I should enter the following additional bugs, or if
On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, John Perry wrote:
I use LyX a lot, and I recently tried to implement a new layout. I've
found that either Lyx itself has bugs, or the manual on customization is
terribly wrong.
Both answers could be right - even simultaneously ;-)
Are these considered errors in the
> "Ran" == Ran Rutenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ran> Hi, Due to the comments made by some people to whom I showed the
Ran> Introduction, I decided to change the header style of the
Ran> document. After the modification, the header looks better in
Ran> Hebrew and fits the styles used in
Recent wiki posts:
(http://wiki.lyx.org/Field/AllRecentChanges)
(http://wiki.lyx.org/devel/pmwiki.php/Field/AllRecentChanges)
* http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/ProducedPublications - 18:16 8/11 by Steve Mueller
Greetings,
I use LyX a lot, and I recently tried to implement a new layout. I've
found that either Lyx itself has bugs, or the manual on customization is
terribly wrong. I have already entered two bugs as 2972 and 2973. I'm
wondering whether I should enter the following additional bugs, or if
On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, John Perry wrote:
> I use LyX a lot, and I recently tried to implement a new layout. I've
> found that either Lyx itself has bugs, or the manual on customization is
> terribly wrong.
Both answers could be right - even simultaneously ;-)
> Are these considered errors in
