Hi,
Paul schrieb:
Also, the italic chapter names in the header at the top of every page
(memoir document class) were coming out as an embedded
NimbusRomNo9L-Regu-Slant_167 font for some reason. All other italic
text was just using a standard Times-Italic non-embedded font.
Nimbus Roman is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Thanks for your advice! Eventhough I'm using the Report style, I still got
rid of the word chapter by adding the command (eventhough I had to type it
as Tex at the beginning of the document, it wouldn't work in the
preamble).
Do you by any chance also know,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just wanna know:
What's worth to use, PDF (dvipdfm) or PDF (pdflatex)? And why?
pdflatex is much faster, because PDF is produced directly from
the .tex file lyx makes. One step only.
dvipdfm is slower, as a dvi is produced first, followed by
conversion to pdf.
Johan Ingvast wrote:
Yes, that's an alternative from using the 1 x 2 table. But my problem
is with the captions. I want a table caption for the table and a
figure caption for the figure. If I put everything in a figure float
both captions will become Figure and vice versa.
/johan
This
On Monday 24 October 2005 15:37, Helge Hafting wrote:
Johan Ingvast wrote:
Yes, that's an alternative from using the 1 x 2 table. But my problem
is with the captions. I want a table caption for the table and a
figure caption for the figure. If I put everything in a figure float
both
Karsten Heymann wrote:
Also, the italic chapter names in the header at the top of every page
(memoir document class) were coming out as an embedded
NimbusRomNo9L-Regu-Slant_167 font for some reason. All other italic
text was just using a standard Times-Italic non-embedded font.
Nimbus Roman
I just tried recompiling todays cvs. Running this lyx gave strange
results. Any latex code from the preamble gets double linespacing,
like this:
\newcommand{\mycommand}{
\something
\something
}
which go wrong, as paragraph breaks are not allowed in commands.
I am rebuilding after a make
Thank you very much! I did manage to get the numbering in front of my own
chapter title and also got rid of the space above the chapter title. Great!
However, I still have the space at the end of a chapter before a new chapter
starts. Can I somehow let a new chapter start on the same page the
Helge Hafting wrote:
I just tried recompiling todays cvs. Running this lyx gave strange
results. Any latex code from the preamble gets double linespacing,
like this:
\newcommand{\mycommand}{
\something
\something
}
which go wrong, as paragraph breaks are not allowed in
I'm looking to place a horizontal rule in a document I'm currently
working on. However, the standard horizontal rule is ugly (it just goes
from one side of the page to the other). How can I tell LyX to put in a
line that isn't as long (and what's a typographically good length to
have it?)?
Thanks
Daniel Watkins wrote:
I'm looking to place a horizontal rule in a document I'm currently
working on. However, the standard horizontal rule is ugly (it just goes
from one side of the page to the other). How can I tell LyX to put in a
line that isn't as long (and what's a typographically good
The Elements of Typographic Style, by Robert Bringhurst, uses
horizontal rules only sparingly, but they extend across the type block.
Of The Elements, the great Hermann Zapf wrote, I wish to see this book
become the Typographers' Bible.
Bruce
On Monday, October 24, 2005, at 03:01 PM,
Dear List,
I just figured out how to disallow LaTeX to linebreak
a math inline formula that resides in the end of a
line. Sometimes they turn so awkward when they are
breaked in the end of the line. With LaTeX I just type
a formula in an \mbox and it solves my problem.. but
what about lyx? how
Jose Capco wrote:
Dear List,
I just figured out how to disallow LaTeX to linebreak
a math inline formula that resides in the end of a
line. Sometimes they turn so awkward when they are
breaked in the end of the line. With LaTeX I just type
a formula in an \mbox and it solves my problem.. but
The Elements of Typographic Style, by Robert Bringhurst, uses
horizontal rules only sparingly, but they extend across the type
block. Of The Elements, the great Hermann Zapf wrote, I wish to see
this book become the Typographers' Bible.
That's as may be, but I'm currently using LyX to
(I assumed the Reply-to: would be the list)
On 24/10/05, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any typographical reason why you might want slanted instead of
italic or vice-versa?
In the original edition describing TeX Knuth is very very strident
about the need for slanted fonts, the wave of
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sam Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
(I assumed the Reply-to: would be the list)
Bad assumption. The list isn't broken.
Knuth also argues in METAFONT that slanted will make it easier for
typeface designers to produce multiple faces from a single style.
So can they get a
On 25/10/05, Mike Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Knuth also argues in METAFONT that slanted will make it easier for
typeface designers to produce multiple faces from a single style.
So can they get a slanted face out of an MM font?
This is my recollection of Knuth's assertion[1]. Then
Try writing your formula in LyX the normal way, then
putting \mbox{ in
ERT to the left of it and } in ERT to the right of
it.
Paul
I just feared that.. so the answer to my question is
actually no but yes , oh well.. I guess there is no
other way. Thanks
Sincerely,
Jose Capco
Hi,
Paul schrieb:
Also, the italic chapter names in the header at the top of every page
(memoir document class) were coming out as an embedded
NimbusRomNo9L-Regu-Slant_167 font for some reason. All other italic
text was just using a standard Times-Italic non-embedded font.
Nimbus Roman is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Thanks for your advice! Eventhough I'm using the Report style, I still got
rid of the word chapter by adding the command (eventhough I had to type it
as Tex at the beginning of the document, it wouldn't work in the
preamble).
Do you by any chance also know,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just wanna know:
What's worth to use, PDF (dvipdfm) or PDF (pdflatex)? And why?
pdflatex is much faster, because PDF is produced directly from
the .tex file lyx makes. One step only.
dvipdfm is slower, as a dvi is produced first, followed by
conversion to pdf.
Johan Ingvast wrote:
Yes, that's an alternative from using the 1 x 2 table. But my problem
is with the captions. I want a table caption for the table and a
figure caption for the figure. If I put everything in a figure float
both captions will become Figure and vice versa.
/johan
This
On Monday 24 October 2005 15:37, Helge Hafting wrote:
Johan Ingvast wrote:
Yes, that's an alternative from using the 1 x 2 table. But my problem
is with the captions. I want a table caption for the table and a
figure caption for the figure. If I put everything in a figure float
both
Karsten Heymann wrote:
Also, the italic chapter names in the header at the top of every page
(memoir document class) were coming out as an embedded
NimbusRomNo9L-Regu-Slant_167 font for some reason. All other italic
text was just using a standard Times-Italic non-embedded font.
Nimbus Roman
I just tried recompiling todays cvs. Running this lyx gave strange
results. Any latex code from the preamble gets double linespacing,
like this:
\newcommand{\mycommand}{
\something
\something
}
which go wrong, as paragraph breaks are not allowed in commands.
I am rebuilding after a make
Thank you very much! I did manage to get the numbering in front of my own
chapter title and also got rid of the space above the chapter title. Great!
However, I still have the space at the end of a chapter before a new chapter
starts. Can I somehow let a new chapter start on the same page the
Helge Hafting wrote:
I just tried recompiling todays cvs. Running this lyx gave strange
results. Any latex code from the preamble gets double linespacing,
like this:
\newcommand{\mycommand}{
\something
\something
}
which go wrong, as paragraph breaks are not allowed in
I'm looking to place a horizontal rule in a document I'm currently
working on. However, the standard horizontal rule is ugly (it just goes
from one side of the page to the other). How can I tell LyX to put in a
line that isn't as long (and what's a typographically good length to
have it?)?
Thanks
Daniel Watkins wrote:
I'm looking to place a horizontal rule in a document I'm currently
working on. However, the standard horizontal rule is ugly (it just goes
from one side of the page to the other). How can I tell LyX to put in a
line that isn't as long (and what's a typographically good
The Elements of Typographic Style, by Robert Bringhurst, uses
horizontal rules only sparingly, but they extend across the type block.
Of The Elements, the great Hermann Zapf wrote, I wish to see this book
become the Typographers' Bible.
Bruce
On Monday, October 24, 2005, at 03:01 PM,
Dear List,
I just figured out how to disallow LaTeX to linebreak
a math inline formula that resides in the end of a
line. Sometimes they turn so awkward when they are
breaked in the end of the line. With LaTeX I just type
a formula in an \mbox and it solves my problem.. but
what about lyx? how
Jose Capco wrote:
Dear List,
I just figured out how to disallow LaTeX to linebreak
a math inline formula that resides in the end of a
line. Sometimes they turn so awkward when they are
breaked in the end of the line. With LaTeX I just type
a formula in an \mbox and it solves my problem.. but
The Elements of Typographic Style, by Robert Bringhurst, uses
horizontal rules only sparingly, but they extend across the type
block. Of The Elements, the great Hermann Zapf wrote, I wish to see
this book become the Typographers' Bible.
That's as may be, but I'm currently using LyX to
(I assumed the Reply-to: would be the list)
On 24/10/05, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any typographical reason why you might want slanted instead of
italic or vice-versa?
In the original edition describing TeX Knuth is very very strident
about the need for slanted fonts, the wave of
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sam Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
(I assumed the Reply-to: would be the list)
Bad assumption. The list isn't broken.
Knuth also argues in METAFONT that slanted will make it easier for
typeface designers to produce multiple faces from a single style.
So can they get a
On 25/10/05, Mike Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Knuth also argues in METAFONT that slanted will make it easier for
typeface designers to produce multiple faces from a single style.
So can they get a slanted face out of an MM font?
This is my recollection of Knuth's assertion[1]. Then
Try writing your formula in LyX the normal way, then
putting \mbox{ in
ERT to the left of it and } in ERT to the right of
it.
Paul
I just feared that.. so the answer to my question is
actually no but yes , oh well.. I guess there is no
other way. Thanks
Sincerely,
Jose Capco
Hi,
Paul schrieb:
Also, the italic chapter names in the header at the top of every page
(memoir document class) were coming out as an embedded
NimbusRomNo9L-Regu-Slant_167 font for some reason. All other italic
text was just using a standard Times-Italic non-embedded font.
Nimbus Roman is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Thanks for your advice! Eventhough I'm using the Report style, I still got
> rid of the word chapter by adding the command (eventhough I had to type it
> as Tex at the beginning of the document, it wouldn't work in the
> preamble).
>
> Do you by any chance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just wanna know:
What's worth to use, PDF (dvipdfm) or PDF (pdflatex)? And why?
pdflatex is much faster, because PDF is produced directly from
the .tex file lyx makes. One step only.
dvipdfm is slower, as a dvi is produced first, followed by
conversion to pdf.
Johan Ingvast wrote:
Yes, that's an alternative from using the 1 x 2 table. But my problem
is with the captions. I want a table caption for the table and a
figure caption for the figure. If I put everything in a figure float
both captions will become "Figure" and vice versa.
/johan
This
On Monday 24 October 2005 15:37, Helge Hafting wrote:
> Johan Ingvast wrote:
> > Yes, that's an alternative from using the 1 x 2 table. But my problem
> > is with the captions. I want a table caption for the table and a
> > figure caption for the figure. If I put everything in a figure float
> >
Karsten Heymann wrote:
>> Also, the italic chapter names in the header at the top of every page
>> (memoir document class) were coming out as an embedded
>> NimbusRomNo9L-Regu-Slant_167 font for some reason. All other italic
>> text was just using a standard Times-Italic non-embedded font.
>
>
I just tried recompiling todays cvs. Running this lyx gave strange
results. Any latex code from the preamble gets double linespacing,
like this:
\newcommand{\mycommand}{
\something
\something
}
which go wrong, as paragraph breaks are not allowed in commands.
I am rebuilding after a make
Thank you very much! I did manage to get the numbering in front of my own
chapter title and also got rid of the space above the chapter title. Great!
However, I still have the space at the end of a chapter before a new chapter
starts. Can I somehow let a new chapter start on the same page the
Helge Hafting wrote:
> I just tried recompiling todays cvs. Running this lyx gave strange
> results. Any latex code from the preamble gets double linespacing,
> like this:
>
> \newcommand{\mycommand}{
>
> \something
>
> \something
>
> }
>
>
>
> which go wrong, as paragraph breaks are not
I'm looking to place a horizontal rule in a document I'm currently
working on. However, the standard horizontal rule is ugly (it just goes
from one side of the page to the other). How can I tell LyX to put in a
line that isn't as long (and what's a typographically good length to
have it?)?
Thanks
Daniel Watkins wrote:
I'm looking to place a horizontal rule in a document I'm currently
working on. However, the standard horizontal rule is ugly (it just goes
from one side of the page to the other). How can I tell LyX to put in a
line that isn't as long (and what's a typographically good
The Elements of Typographic Style, by Robert Bringhurst, uses
horizontal rules only sparingly, but they extend across the type block.
Of The Elements, the great Hermann Zapf wrote, "I wish to see this book
become the Typographers' Bible."
Bruce
On Monday, October 24, 2005, at 03:01 PM,
Dear List,
I just figured out how to disallow LaTeX to linebreak
a math inline formula that resides in the end of a
line. Sometimes they turn so awkward when they are
breaked in the end of the line. With LaTeX I just type
a formula in an \mbox and it solves my problem.. but
what about lyx? how
Jose Capco wrote:
Dear List,
I just figured out how to disallow LaTeX to linebreak
a math inline formula that resides in the end of a
line. Sometimes they turn so awkward when they are
breaked in the end of the line. With LaTeX I just type
a formula in an \mbox and it solves my problem.. but
> The Elements of Typographic Style, by Robert Bringhurst, uses
> horizontal rules only sparingly, but they extend across the type
> block. Of The Elements, the great Hermann Zapf wrote, "I wish to see
> this book become the Typographers' Bible."
That's as may be, but I'm currently using LyX to
(I assumed the Reply-to: would be the list)
On 24/10/05, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any typographical reason why you might want slanted instead of
> italic or vice-versa?
In the original edition describing TeX Knuth is very very strident
about the need for slanted fonts, the
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sam Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> (I assumed the Reply-to: would be the list)
Bad assumption. The list isn't broken.
> Knuth also argues in METAFONT that slanted will make it easier for
> typeface designers to produce multiple faces from a single style.
So can
On 25/10/05, Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Knuth also argues in METAFONT that slanted will make it easier for
> > typeface designers to produce multiple faces from a single style.
>
> So can they get a slanted face out of an MM font?
This is my recollection of Knuth's assertion[1].
> Try writing your formula in LyX the normal way, then
> putting \mbox{ in
> ERT to the left of it and } in ERT to the right of
> it.
>
> Paul
I just feared that.. so the answer to my question is
actually "no but yes" , oh well.. I guess there is no
other way. Thanks
Sincerely,
Jose Capco
57 matches
Mail list logo
