Re: please consolidate the documentation

2006-07-29 Thread Helge Hafting
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 12:08:48AM +1000, John Pye wrote: Hi all, I'd like to say congratulations to all on the re-inauguration of the LyX documentation team ;-) ! The scattered documentation of LyX has frustrated me too. I have some thoughts and ideas to mention... [...] I don't think

Re: re-generating microtype

2006-07-29 Thread Helge Hafting
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 09:55:02PM -0400, mail.k wrote: Friends, I'd like to re-generate the Microtype package (to enable the pdfadjustinterowrdglue option). The instructions require me to look at the .ins .dtx files in the package.cab, edit out the comment: %\betatrue and then generate

Re: please consolidate the documentation

2006-07-29 Thread Stephen Harris
Helge Hafting wrote: On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 12:08:48AM +1000, John Pye wrote: I don't think that we should expect people to use LyX as their documentation browser. Sure, LyX is not my choice for a browser. But documentation for LyX itself is a special case, see below: Operating

Re: 1.4.2 pdflatex viewing problem

2006-07-29 Thread chipbrock
open in the viewer field seems to do it. That seems a bug and has not been an issue in the previous versions. Lyx OSX should respect the default pdf viewer app as it has. Thanks for the help... Ray

Re: Abnormal behaviour of greyed out note

2006-07-29 Thread Georg Baum
Am Freitag, 28. Juli 2006 17:08 schrieb Nicolás: However, when I do the same in a paragraph with Itemize style the result in DVI is the following: First part of my paragraph - note's text in grey (in new line and with '-' in front) rest of the paragraph Is this the intended

Re: Postscript preview

2006-07-29 Thread LB
Thank you Paul for all your help. Adding path to GS in lyx.bat did not solved the problem. I have this feeling that the problem is somehow related to the postscript commands inside the figure... I'm giving up and going back to use version 1.4.1. Cheers Leo One other difference I notices is

Re: Postscript preview

2006-07-29 Thread Paul A. Rubin
LB wrote: Thank you Paul for all your help. Adding path to GS in lyx.bat did not solved the problem. I have this feeling that the problem is somehow related to the postscript commands inside the figure... I don't know much about Postscript, but I looked in your test.ps file a few days ago

aspell / problems with umlauts

2006-07-29 Thread Reinhard Mayr aka Czerwinski
Hello on the list! I have a problem concerning aspell: The document I write is in English, but my university wants me to write some paragraphs in German. OK, I select them, change the language accordingly, installed the aspell-de package and check the spelling. Words containing an umlaut

LyX 1.4.2, Aspell and second languages

2006-07-29 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Hi, Under Win XP, I have Aspell loaded in C:\Aspell, including the German (de_DE) dictionaries. In the LyX 1.4.2 settings, I have de_DE listed as the alternate language. (The preferences file has \use_alt_language true \alternate_language de_DE in it.) However, if I try to spell-check a

Re: Postscript preview

2006-07-29 Thread LB
When you added the GS path in lyx.bat, did you add the path to the lib directory as well as to the bin directory? Yes I did. I'm giving up and going back to use version 1.4.1. Well, I can't say I blame you ... 1.4.1 worked pretty well for me. I just hope this problem does not recur when

Re: Postscript preview

2006-07-29 Thread Stephen Harris
LB wrote: When you added the GS path in lyx.bat, did you add the path to the lib directory as well as to the bin directory? Yes I did. I'm giving up and going back to use version 1.4.1. Well, I can't say I blame you ... 1.4.1 worked pretty well for me. I just hope this problem does not

Re: Postscript preview

2006-07-29 Thread Jens Noeckel
On Jul 29, 2006, at 9:09 PM, Stephen Harris wrote: LB wrote: When you added the GS path in lyx.bat, did you add the path to the lib directory as well as to the bin directory? Yes I did. I'm giving up and going back to use version 1.4.1. Well, I can't say I blame you ... 1.4.1 worked

Re: please consolidate the documentation

2006-07-29 Thread Helge Hafting
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 12:08:48AM +1000, John Pye wrote: Hi all, I'd like to say congratulations to all on the re-inauguration of the LyX documentation team ;-) ! The scattered documentation of LyX has frustrated me too. I have some thoughts and ideas to mention... [...] I don't think

Re: re-generating microtype

2006-07-29 Thread Helge Hafting
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 09:55:02PM -0400, mail.k wrote: Friends, I'd like to re-generate the Microtype package (to enable the pdfadjustinterowrdglue option). The instructions require me to look at the .ins .dtx files in the package.cab, edit out the comment: %\betatrue and then generate

Re: please consolidate the documentation

2006-07-29 Thread Stephen Harris
Helge Hafting wrote: On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 12:08:48AM +1000, John Pye wrote: I don't think that we should expect people to use LyX as their documentation browser. Sure, LyX is not my choice for a browser. But documentation for LyX itself is a special case, see below: Operating

Re: 1.4.2 pdflatex viewing problem

2006-07-29 Thread chipbrock
open in the viewer field seems to do it. That seems a bug and has not been an issue in the previous versions. Lyx OSX should respect the default pdf viewer app as it has. Thanks for the help... Ray

Re: Abnormal behaviour of greyed out note

2006-07-29 Thread Georg Baum
Am Freitag, 28. Juli 2006 17:08 schrieb Nicolás: However, when I do the same in a paragraph with Itemize style the result in DVI is the following: First part of my paragraph - note's text in grey (in new line and with '-' in front) rest of the paragraph Is this the intended

Re: Postscript preview

2006-07-29 Thread LB
Thank you Paul for all your help. Adding path to GS in lyx.bat did not solved the problem. I have this feeling that the problem is somehow related to the postscript commands inside the figure... I'm giving up and going back to use version 1.4.1. Cheers Leo One other difference I notices is

Re: Postscript preview

2006-07-29 Thread Paul A. Rubin
LB wrote: Thank you Paul for all your help. Adding path to GS in lyx.bat did not solved the problem. I have this feeling that the problem is somehow related to the postscript commands inside the figure... I don't know much about Postscript, but I looked in your test.ps file a few days ago

aspell / problems with umlauts

2006-07-29 Thread Reinhard Mayr aka Czerwinski
Hello on the list! I have a problem concerning aspell: The document I write is in English, but my university wants me to write some paragraphs in German. OK, I select them, change the language accordingly, installed the aspell-de package and check the spelling. Words containing an umlaut

LyX 1.4.2, Aspell and second languages

2006-07-29 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Hi, Under Win XP, I have Aspell loaded in C:\Aspell, including the German (de_DE) dictionaries. In the LyX 1.4.2 settings, I have de_DE listed as the alternate language. (The preferences file has \use_alt_language true \alternate_language de_DE in it.) However, if I try to spell-check a

Re: Postscript preview

2006-07-29 Thread LB
When you added the GS path in lyx.bat, did you add the path to the lib directory as well as to the bin directory? Yes I did. I'm giving up and going back to use version 1.4.1. Well, I can't say I blame you ... 1.4.1 worked pretty well for me. I just hope this problem does not recur when

Re: Postscript preview

2006-07-29 Thread Stephen Harris
LB wrote: When you added the GS path in lyx.bat, did you add the path to the lib directory as well as to the bin directory? Yes I did. I'm giving up and going back to use version 1.4.1. Well, I can't say I blame you ... 1.4.1 worked pretty well for me. I just hope this problem does not

Re: Postscript preview

2006-07-29 Thread Jens Noeckel
On Jul 29, 2006, at 9:09 PM, Stephen Harris wrote: LB wrote: When you added the GS path in lyx.bat, did you add the path to the lib directory as well as to the bin directory? Yes I did. I'm giving up and going back to use version 1.4.1. Well, I can't say I blame you ... 1.4.1 worked

Re: please consolidate the documentation

2006-07-29 Thread Helge Hafting
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 12:08:48AM +1000, John Pye wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to say congratulations to all on the re-inauguration of the LyX > documentation team ;-) ! The scattered documentation of LyX has > frustrated me too. I have some thoughts and ideas to mention... > [...] > I don't

Re: re-generating microtype

2006-07-29 Thread Helge Hafting
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 09:55:02PM -0400, mail.k wrote: > Friends, > > I'd like to re-generate the Microtype package (to enable the > pdfadjustinterowrdglue option). > The instructions require me to look at the .ins .dtx files in the > package.cab, edit out the comment: %\betatrue > and then

Re: please consolidate the documentation

2006-07-29 Thread Stephen Harris
Helge Hafting wrote: On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 12:08:48AM +1000, John Pye wrote: I don't think that we should expect people to use LyX as their documentation browser. Sure, LyX is not my choice for a browser. But documentation for LyX itself is a special case, see below: Operating

Re: 1.4.2 pdflatex viewing problem

2006-07-29 Thread chipbrock
"open" in the viewer field seems to do it. That seems a bug and has not been an issue in the previous versions. Lyx OSX should respect the default pdf viewer app as it has. Thanks for the help... Ray

Re: Abnormal behaviour of "greyed out note"

2006-07-29 Thread Georg Baum
Am Freitag, 28. Juli 2006 17:08 schrieb Nicolás: > However, when I do the same in a paragraph with Itemize style the result > in DVI is the following: > > "First part of my paragraph > - note's text in grey (in new line and with '-' in front) > rest of the paragraph" > > Is this the

Re: Postscript preview

2006-07-29 Thread LB
Thank you Paul for all your help. Adding path to GS in lyx.bat did not solved the problem. I have this feeling that the problem is somehow related to the postscript commands inside the figure... I'm giving up and going back to use version 1.4.1. Cheers Leo One other difference I notices is

Re: Postscript preview

2006-07-29 Thread Paul A. Rubin
LB wrote: Thank you Paul for all your help. Adding path to GS in lyx.bat did not solved the problem. I have this feeling that the problem is somehow related to the postscript commands inside the figure... I don't know much about Postscript, but I looked in your test.ps file a few days ago

aspell / problems with umlauts

2006-07-29 Thread Reinhard Mayr aka Czerwinski
Hello on the list! I have a problem concerning aspell: The document I write is in English, but my university wants me to write some paragraphs in German. OK, I select them, change the language accordingly, installed the aspell-de package and check the spelling. Words containing an umlaut

LyX 1.4.2, Aspell and second languages

2006-07-29 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Hi, Under Win XP, I have Aspell loaded in C:\Aspell, including the German (de_DE) dictionaries. In the LyX 1.4.2 settings, I have de_DE listed as the alternate language. (The preferences file has \use_alt_language true \alternate_language "de_DE" in it.) However, if I try to spell-check

Re: Postscript preview

2006-07-29 Thread LB
> When you added the GS path in lyx.bat, did you add the path to the lib > directory as well as to the bin directory? Yes I did. > > I'm giving up and going back to use version 1.4.1. > > Well, I can't say I blame you ... 1.4.1 worked pretty well for me. I > just hope this problem does not

Re: Postscript preview

2006-07-29 Thread Stephen Harris
LB wrote: When you added the GS path in lyx.bat, did you add the path to the lib directory as well as to the bin directory? Yes I did. I'm giving up and going back to use version 1.4.1. Well, I can't say I blame you ... 1.4.1 worked pretty well for me. I just hope this problem does not

Re: Postscript preview

2006-07-29 Thread Jens Noeckel
On Jul 29, 2006, at 9:09 PM, Stephen Harris wrote: LB wrote: When you added the GS path in lyx.bat, did you add the path to the lib directory as well as to the bin directory? Yes I did. I'm giving up and going back to use version 1.4.1. Well, I can't say I blame you ... 1.4.1 worked