Re: Create a shortcut to insert the frames separator for beamer documents

2023-03-15 Thread Paul A. Rubin
On 3/15/23 12:46, Ehud Behar wrote: Just created it. The message pane says "Unknown function. Warning: unknown command definition 'newframe' Are you sure it is this name for the function? Sorry, I forgot that long ago I set up the "newframe" command for this purpose. I have the attached

Re: Create a shortcut to insert the frames separator for beamer documents

2023-03-15 Thread Ehud Behar
Just created it. The message pane says "Unknown function. Warning: unknown command definition 'newframe' Are you sure it is this name for the function? -- lyx-users mailing list lyx-users@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users

Re: Create a shortcut to insert the frames separator for beamer documents

2023-03-15 Thread Paul A. Rubin
On 3/15/23 11:49, Ehud Behar wrote: I want to create a shortcut to insert the short thin red line that separates frames when the document class is Beamer. I know how to create shortcuts, I just don't know the name of the "function" that actually inserts this red line. In the lyx file this

Re: Broken document

2023-03-15 Thread Udicoudco
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 4:54 PM Udicoudco wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 10:57 AM Daniel wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> I somehow managed to break one of my documents and cannot see where the >> problem is. I have attached a minimal example that I produced after a >> longer error hunt (because LyX

Create a shortcut to insert the frames separator for beamer documents

2023-03-15 Thread Ehud Behar
I want to create a shortcut to insert the short thin red line that separates frames when the document class is Beamer. I know how to create shortcuts, I just don't know the name of the "function" that actually inserts this red line. In the lyx file this red line is called "Separator plain".

Re: my own color

2023-03-15 Thread Patrick Dupre
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 05:17:51PM +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > Indeed, this bug is very old 14 years! > > Maybe it is time to fix it? > > > > Unfortunately, I cannot do it myself. > > I see that the bug claims there is a workaround, namely if you write your > \textcolor{Gold} in normal

Re: Broken document

2023-03-15 Thread Daniel
On 15/03/2023 14:55, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 01:17:33PM +0100, Daniel wrote: On 15/03/2023 12:18, Axel Dessecker via lyx-users wrote: Am Mittwoch, 15. März 2023, 12:05:24 CET schrieb Eckhard Höffner: Accroding to the log, the error ist in refstyle.cfg ! Argument of

RE: Broken document

2023-03-15 Thread kzstatis
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht- > Van: lyx-users Namens Daniel > Verzonden: woensdag 15 maart 2023 09:57 > Aan: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org > Onderwerp: Broken document > > Hi! > > I somehow managed to break one of my documents and cannot see where > the problem is. I have attached a minimal

Re: Broken document

2023-03-15 Thread Udicoudco
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 10:57 AM Daniel wrote: > Hi! > > I somehow managed to break one of my documents and cannot see where the > problem is. I have attached a minimal example that I produced after a > longer error hunt (because LyX did not give me helpful error feedback on > this). > > Does

Re: Broken document

2023-03-15 Thread Eckhard Höffner
I can reproduce the error. I have TeX Live (https://tug.org/texlive) version 2022. But refstyle.cfg and refstyle.sty haven't changed since 2010 (according to the files). That's what  Lyx produces, if refstyle is used: \documentclass[british]{article}

Re: Broken document

2023-03-15 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 01:17:33PM +0100, Daniel wrote: > On 15/03/2023 12:18, Axel Dessecker via lyx-users wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 15. März 2023, 12:05:24 CET schrieb Eckhard Höffner: > > > Accroding to the log, the error ist in refstyle.cfg > > > > > > > > > ! Argument of \eqref has an extra

Re: my own color

2023-03-15 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 05:17:51PM +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Indeed, this bug is very old 14 years! > Maybe it is time to fix it? > > Unfortunately, I cannot do it myself. I see that the bug claims there is a workaround, namely if you write your \textcolor{Gold} in normal text, copy it into

Re: Broken document

2023-03-15 Thread Eckhard Höffner
Yes. That's part of the log file: Package refstyle Info: \eqlabel created on input line 526. Package refstyle Info: \eqref created on input line 526. ! Argument of \eqref has an extra }. \par l.526 lsttxt = \RSlsttxt} I've run across a `}' that doesn't seem to match anything. For

Re: Broken document

2023-03-15 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 15.03.2023 um 14:34 schrieb Daniel : > > On 15/03/2023 14:28, Eckhard Höffner wrote: >> That's another possible LyX specific cause: >> \makeatletter >> %% LyX specific LaTeX commands. >> \AtBeginDocument{\providecommand\figref[1]{\ref{fig:#1}}} >>

Re: Broken document

2023-03-15 Thread Daniel
On 15/03/2023 14:28, Eckhard Höffner wrote: That's another possible LyX specific cause: \makeatletter %% LyX specific LaTeX commands. \AtBeginDocument{\providecommand\figref[1]{\ref{fig:#1}}} \RS@ifundefined{subsecref}   {\newref{subsec}{name = \RSsectxt}}   {}

Re: Broken document

2023-03-15 Thread Eckhard Höffner
That's another possible LyX specific cause: \makeatletter %% LyX specific LaTeX commands. \AtBeginDocument{\providecommand\figref[1]{\ref{fig:#1}}} \RS@ifundefined{subsecref}   {\newref{subsec}{name = \RSsectxt}}   {} \RS@ifundefined{thmref}  

Re: Broken document

2023-03-15 Thread Daniel
On 15/03/2023 12:18, Axel Dessecker via lyx-users wrote: Am Mittwoch, 15. März 2023, 12:05:24 CET schrieb Eckhard Höffner: Accroding to the log, the error ist in refstyle.cfg ! Argument of \eqref has an extra }. \par l.526lsttxt= \RSlsttxt} I've run across a `}'

Re: Broken document

2023-03-15 Thread Axel Dessecker via lyx-users
Am Mittwoch, 15. März 2023, 12:05:24 CET schrieb Eckhard Höffner: > Accroding to the log, the error ist in refstyle.cfg > > > ! Argument of \eqref has an extra }. > > \par > l.526lsttxt= \RSlsttxt} > > I've run across a `}' that doesn't seem to match anything. > >

Re: Broken document

2023-03-15 Thread Eckhard Höffner
Accroding to the log, the error ist in refstyle.cfg ! Argument of \eqref  has an extra }.     \par l.526    lsttxt    = \RSlsttxt} I've run across a `}' that doesn't seem to match anything. Runaway argument? ! Paragraph ended before \eqref  was complete.    \par

Re: Broken document

2023-03-15 Thread Daniel
On 15/03/2023 10:56, Axel Dessecker via lyx-users wrote: Am Mittwoch, 15. März 2023, 10:49:33 CET schrieb Daniel: On 15/03/2023 10:37, Axel Dessecker via lyx-users wrote: Am Mittwoch, 15. März 2023, 09:57:13 CET schrieb Daniel: Hi! I somehow managed to break one of my documents and cannot

Re: Broken document

2023-03-15 Thread Axel Dessecker via lyx-users
Am Mittwoch, 15. März 2023, 10:49:33 CET schrieb Daniel: > On 15/03/2023 10:37, Axel Dessecker via lyx-users wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 15. März 2023, 09:57:13 CET schrieb Daniel: > >> Hi! > >> > >> I somehow managed to break one of my documents and cannot see where the > >> problem is. I have

Re: Broken document

2023-03-15 Thread Daniel
On 15/03/2023 10:37, Axel Dessecker via lyx-users wrote: Am Mittwoch, 15. März 2023, 09:57:13 CET schrieb Daniel: Hi! I somehow managed to break one of my documents and cannot see where the problem is. I have attached a minimal example that I produced after a longer error hunt (because LyX did

Re: Broken document

2023-03-15 Thread Axel Dessecker via lyx-users
Am Mittwoch, 15. März 2023, 09:57:13 CET schrieb Daniel: > Hi! > > I somehow managed to break one of my documents and cannot see where the > problem is. I have attached a minimal example that I produced after a > longer error hunt (because LyX did not give me helpful error feedback on > this). >

Broken document

2023-03-15 Thread Daniel
Hi! I somehow managed to break one of my documents and cannot see where the problem is. I have attached a minimal example that I produced after a longer error hunt (because LyX did not give me helpful error feedback on this). Does someone have an idea how the error occurred or how I might