Re: lyx svg file handling

Neal Becker wrote: Nils Becker wrote: Hi all, thanks for the hints so far. Nothing worked yet. I checked: when I do not define any converters, lyx calls convert. This gives the same pixel graphics I get when I define only the svg-pdf2 converter. The .lyx/lyxrc.defaults file contains no svg

Re: lyx svg file handling

Neal Becker wrote: Nils Becker wrote: Hi all, thanks for the hints so far. Nothing worked yet. I checked: when I do not define any converters, lyx calls convert. This gives the same pixel graphics I get when I define only the svg-pdf2 converter. The .lyx/lyxrc.defaults file contains no svg

Re: lyx svg file handling

Neal Becker wrote: Nils Becker wrote: Hi all, thanks for the hints so far. Nothing worked yet. I checked: when I do not define any converters, lyx calls "convert". This gives the same pixel graphics I get when I define only the svg->pdf2 converter. The .lyx/lyxrc.defaults file contains no svg

Re: CJK seems to be partially working in 1.5.0

Marc Flerackers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: However I can only render my document manually by exporting to latex and running latex and bibtex, as lyx seems to crash on an exception when pressing the render button: Hi, Marc. Could you repost this to the lyx-devel list. Given that you're

Re: CJK seems to be partially working in 1.5.0

Marc Flerackers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: However I can only render my document manually by exporting to latex and running latex and bibtex, as lyx seems to crash on an exception when pressing the render button: Hi, Marc. Could you repost this to the lyx-devel list. Given that you're

Re: CJK seems to be partially working in 1.5.0

Marc Flerackers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > However I can only render my document > manually by exporting to latex and running latex and bibtex, as lyx > seems to crash on an exception when pressing the render button: Hi, Marc. Could you repost this to the lyx-devel list. Given that you're

Re: please consolidate the documentation

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Having said that, I think that what the LyX documentation mainly needs is an editor - someone to guide/decide what should go into the documentation. As far as I know there is no editor today (please correct me if I'm wrong!) No, you're right. The last editor was

Re: please consolidate the documentation

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Having said that, I think that what the LyX documentation mainly needs is an editor - someone to guide/decide what should go into the documentation. As far as I know there is no editor today (please correct me if I'm wrong!) No, you're right. The last editor was

Re: please consolidate the documentation

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Having said that, I think that what the LyX documentation mainly needs is > an editor - someone to guide/decide what should go into the documentation. > As far as I know there is no editor today (please correct me if I'm > wrong!) No, you're right. The last

Re: PortableLyX?

Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Now, having experienced the latest version of LyX, I've tested 1.4.1 on a USB stick. All good, if there wouldn't be the aspell dilemma! As LyX is compiled against libaspell.a and expects to find aspell dictionaries and data files in a predefined

Re: PortableLyX?

Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Now, having experienced the latest version of LyX, I've tested 1.4.1 on a USB stick. All good, if there wouldn't be the aspell dilemma! As LyX is compiled against libaspell.a and expects to find aspell dictionaries and data files in a predefined

Re: PortableLyX?

Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Now, having experienced the latest version of LyX, >> I've tested 1.4.1 on a USB stick. All good, if there >> wouldn't be the aspell dilemma! As LyX is compiled >> against libaspell.a and expects to find aspell >> dictionaries and data files in a

Re: sixth release of LyXWinInstaller

Micha feigin wrote: Either tex understands escape sequences (which includes escaping spaces) or it has a method of defining what a string is, including the spaces which is different on windows and linux, or it has different spaces for string delimiting and path spaces under linux. Guys, I'm

Re: sixth release of LyXWinInstaller

Micha feigin wrote: Either tex understands escape sequences (which includes escaping spaces) or it has a method of defining what a string is, including the spaces which is different on windows and linux, or it has different spaces for string delimiting and path spaces under linux. Guys, I'm

Re: sixth release of LyXWinInstaller

Micha feigin wrote: > Either tex understands escape sequences (which includes escaping spaces) > or it has a method of defining what a string is, including the spaces > which is different on windows and linux, or it has different spaces for > string delimiting and path spaces under linux. Guys,

LyX 1.3.7pre6 available

Dear all, I've just uploaded LyX 1.3.7pre6 to the wiki. Grab it from http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX137pre Improvements over LyX 1.3.7pre5: * Many changes to qt-mt3.dll. * Update of Danish, Hungarian and Spanish translations. * Add a Polish Translation to the Windows Installer.

LyX 1.3.7pre6 available

Dear all, I've just uploaded LyX 1.3.7pre6 to the wiki. Grab it from http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX137pre Improvements over LyX 1.3.7pre5: * Many changes to qt-mt3.dll. * Update of Danish, Hungarian and Spanish translations. * Add a Polish Translation to the Windows Installer.

LyX 1.3.7pre6 available

Dear all, I've just uploaded LyX 1.3.7pre6 to the wiki. Grab it from http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX137pre Improvements over LyX 1.3.7pre5: * Many changes to qt-mt3.dll. * Update of Danish, Hungarian and Spanish translations. * Add a Polish Translation to the Windows Installer.

Re: [announce] sixth release of LyXWinInstaller

Stephen Harris wrote: Bo The Miktex installation doc recommends installing Miktex into paths and/or directories without spaces. LyX has a history of problems with paths having spaces some passed on from Miktex. http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/Windows/LyX136pre 13 July 2005 Axel Rasche

Re: 100% CPU usage for LyX 1.3.5 and questions on LyX 1.4

Jose Capco wrote: Dear List, First off.. a happy new year! I don't look much at this mailing list, I filtered it so I could only view at specific topics, so I do not know if this has been discussed before. Since the release of 1.3.6, I wasn't able to upgrade due to issues with Win98

Re: [announce] sixth release of LyXWinInstaller

Bo Peng wrote: _TeX_ cannot handle spaces. I suppose that you do not really know the difference of TeX, LaTeX, pdfTeX, pdfLaTeX, bibTeX, MiKTeX I do not. My understanding is that miktex is another implementation of latex standard ( if there is such a standard). If miktex aims at windows

Re: [announce] sixth release of LyXWinInstaller

Michael Gerz wrote: Bo Peng wrote: The mistake is making C:\Program files the default for LyX and friends. I totally agree. I think it is a good idea to install Lyx to c:\lyx by default. No, the directory must be configurable. On my (German) machine, the appropriate directory is

Re: [announce] sixth release of LyXWinInstaller

Stephen Harris wrote: Right. And since I install at C:\Program Files\LyX and the bloody thing works for me, I'm going to put on my grumpy old man hat and say it's a user error to try and use a .bst file in a path with spaces. And to think, just last night it was a party hat. The mood swings

Re: [announce] sixth release of LyXWinInstaller

Stephen Harris wrote: Bo The Miktex installation doc recommends installing Miktex into paths and/or directories without spaces. LyX has a history of problems with paths having spaces some passed on from Miktex. http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/Windows/LyX136pre 13 July 2005 Axel Rasche

Re: 100% CPU usage for LyX 1.3.5 and questions on LyX 1.4

Jose Capco wrote: Dear List, First off.. a happy new year! I don't look much at this mailing list, I filtered it so I could only view at specific topics, so I do not know if this has been discussed before. Since the release of 1.3.6, I wasn't able to upgrade due to issues with Win98

Re: [announce] sixth release of LyXWinInstaller

Bo Peng wrote: _TeX_ cannot handle spaces. I suppose that you do not really know the difference of TeX, LaTeX, pdfTeX, pdfLaTeX, bibTeX, MiKTeX I do not. My understanding is that miktex is another implementation of latex standard ( if there is such a standard). If miktex aims at windows

Re: [announce] sixth release of LyXWinInstaller

Michael Gerz wrote: Bo Peng wrote: The mistake is making C:\Program files the default for LyX and friends. I totally agree. I think it is a good idea to install Lyx to c:\lyx by default. No, the directory must be configurable. On my (German) machine, the appropriate directory is

Re: [announce] sixth release of LyXWinInstaller

Stephen Harris wrote: Right. And since I install at C:\Program Files\LyX and the bloody thing works for me, I'm going to put on my grumpy old man hat and say it's a user error to try and use a .bst file in a path with spaces. And to think, just last night it was a party hat. The mood swings

Re: [announce] sixth release of LyXWinInstaller

Stephen Harris wrote: > Bo > > The Miktex installation doc recommends installing Miktex into paths > and/or directories without spaces. LyX has a history of problems > with paths having spaces some passed on from Miktex. > > http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/Windows/LyX136pre > 13 July 2005 > Axel

Re: 100% CPU usage for LyX 1.3.5 and questions on LyX 1.4

Jose Capco wrote: > Dear List, > > First off.. a happy new year! > > I don't look much at this mailing list, I filtered it > so I could only view at specific topics, so I do not > know if this has been discussed before. Since the > release of 1.3.6, I wasn't able to upgrade due to > issues with

Re: [announce] sixth release of LyXWinInstaller

Bo Peng wrote: >> _TeX_ cannot handle spaces. I suppose that you do not really >> know the difference of TeX, LaTeX, pdfTeX, pdfLaTeX, bibTeX, MiKTeX > > I do not. My understanding is that miktex is another implementation of > latex standard ( if there is such a standard). If miktex aims at >

Re: [announce] sixth release of LyXWinInstaller

Michael Gerz wrote: > Bo Peng wrote: > >>>The mistake is making C:\Program files the default for LyX and >>>friends. >>> >>> >>I totally agree. I think it is a good idea to install Lyx to c:\lyx by >>default. >> >> > No, the directory must be configurable. On my (German) machine, the >

Re: [announce] sixth release of LyXWinInstaller

Stephen Harris wrote: >> Right. And since I install at C:\Program Files\LyX and the bloody thing >> works for me, I'm going to put on my grumpy old man hat and say it's a >> "user error" to try and use a .bst file in a path with spaces. > And to think, just last night it was a party hat. The

Re: [announce] sixth release of LyXWinInstaller

Paul A. Rubin wrote: Bo Peng wrote: If you View-LaTeX info-BibTeX styles, can you see the .bst file? No. The .bst file is under the same directory as the .lyx file. I use 'browse' in the bib tex dialog to use it. Under linux, this is enough. I can reproduce the problem (Win XP, LyX

Re: [announce] sixth release of LyXWinInstaller

Paul A. Rubin wrote: Bo Peng wrote: If you View-LaTeX info-BibTeX styles, can you see the .bst file? No. The .bst file is under the same directory as the .lyx file. I use 'browse' in the bib tex dialog to use it. Under linux, this is enough. I can reproduce the problem (Win XP, LyX

Re: [announce] sixth release of LyXWinInstaller

Paul A. Rubin wrote: > Bo Peng wrote: >>>If you View->LaTeX info->BibTeX styles, can you see the .bst file? >> No. The .bst file is under the same directory as the .lyx file. I use >> 'browse' in the bib tex dialog to use it. Under linux, this is enough. > I can reproduce the problem (Win XP,

Re: Windows port of 1.3.6 fails to process pstricks code

Abel Fernández Fernández wrote: Jeremy Daily escribió: LyX users: I've run into a small problem. I've started a manuscript full of pstricks code on the unofficial windows port (version 1.3.3). Since I was delighted to see an official LyX port for windows, I tried version 1.3.6. This

Re: Windows port of 1.3.6 fails to process pstricks code

Abel Fernández Fernández wrote: Jeremy Daily escribió: LyX users: I've run into a small problem. I've started a manuscript full of pstricks code on the unofficial windows port (version 1.3.3). Since I was delighted to see an official LyX port for windows, I tried version 1.3.6. This

Re: Windows port of 1.3.6 fails to process pstricks code

Abel Fernández Fernández wrote: > Jeremy Daily escribió: > >> LyX users: >> >> I've run into a small problem. I've started a manuscript full of >> pstricks code on the unofficial windows port (version 1.3.3). Since I >> was delighted to see an official LyX port for windows, I tried version >>

Re: TeX version is 3.141592. pi?

John E. Harbold wrote: Hi, Has anyone noticed that the current version of TeX is 3.141592. I'm having adversed reaction to this because I can't access the aastex macros. Has TeX been hacked yet? I'm not sure what you're trying to say. If you're asking is the above TeX version number

Re: [announce] sixth release of LyXWinInstaller

Bo Peng wrote: I just published the version 0.6 of the LyX installer for Windows. Just tried the complete version of the installer on a fresh winXP VM: installation goes fine and everything works as expected. Thank you for the great work! I think this installer is ready to go public or

Re: TeX version is 3.141592. pi?

John E. Harbold wrote: Hi, Has anyone noticed that the current version of TeX is 3.141592. I'm having adversed reaction to this because I can't access the aastex macros. Has TeX been hacked yet? I'm not sure what you're trying to say. If you're asking is the above TeX version number

Re: [announce] sixth release of LyXWinInstaller

Bo Peng wrote: I just published the version 0.6 of the LyX installer for Windows. Just tried the complete version of the installer on a fresh winXP VM: installation goes fine and everything works as expected. Thank you for the great work! I think this installer is ready to go public or

Re: TeX version is 3.141592. pi?

John E. Harbold wrote: > Hi, > > Has anyone noticed that the current > version of TeX is 3.141592. I'm having > adversed reaction to this because I > can't access the aastex macros. Has TeX > been hacked yet? I'm not sure what you're trying to say. If you're asking is the above TeX version

Re: [announce] sixth release of LyXWinInstaller

Bo Peng wrote: >> I just published the version 0.6 of the LyX installer for Windows. > > Just tried the complete version of the installer on a fresh winXP VM: > installation goes fine and everything works as expected. Thank you for > the great work! > > I think this installer is ready to go

Re: LyX 1.3.7pre5 some more progress in diagnosis

Stephen Harris wrote: Addendum: I find that C:\Msys\1.0\bin or C:\texmf\miktex\bin or C:\Python23 will work individually; but combinations like Msys and Python, Msys and texmf, or Python and texmf, will fail to run the configure script, requiring sh.exe configure. I have installed to C:\LyX

Re: LyX 1.3.7pre5 some more progress in diagnosis

Stephen Harris wrote: Addendum: I find that C:\Msys\1.0\bin or C:\texmf\miktex\bin or C:\Python23 will work individually; but combinations like Msys and Python, Msys and texmf, or Python and texmf, will fail to run the configure script, requiring sh.exe configure. I have installed to C:\LyX

Re: LyX 1.3.7pre5 some more progress in diagnosis

Stephen Harris wrote: > Addendum: I find that C:\Msys\1.0\bin or C:\texmf\miktex\bin > or C:\Python23 will work individually; but combinations like > Msys and Python, Msys and texmf, or Python and texmf, will > fail to run the configure script, requiring sh.exe configure. > I have installed to

Re: Writing in Japanese?

Stacia Hartleben wrote: Can you use the current LyX program to write in Japanese? I heard something about a CJK version but I was wondering if there was any easy way to change the encoding in the window and turn it into unicode or something. Nope, not yet. The Big Plan (TM) for the next

Re: Writing in Japanese?

Stacia Hartleben wrote: Can you use the current LyX program to write in Japanese? I heard something about a CJK version but I was wondering if there was any easy way to change the encoding in the window and turn it into unicode or something. Nope, not yet. The Big Plan (TM) for the next

Re: Writing in Japanese?

Stacia Hartleben wrote: > Can you use the current LyX program to write in Japanese? I heard > something about a CJK version but I was wondering if there was any > easy way to change the encoding in the window and turn it into unicode > or something. Nope, not yet. The Big Plan (TM) for the next

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

Stephen Harris wrote: No, he did not. I'll get back to that. I appreciate your calm response. ;-) This is what Angus initially said to me: The installer searches the Registry in various ways in order to find the whereabouts of sh.exe, gswinc.exe, python.exe, etc. It's blindingly obvious

Re: How to verify links on wiki.lyx? (Was: ...)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, Todd Denniston wrote: Oh, and it would be a good idea for someone to make sure all the links work correctly now... Does anyone know of a tool which would be useful to traverse a web site and check which links doesn't work? (In this case we

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

Stephen Harris wrote: No, he did not. I'll get back to that. I appreciate your calm response. ;-) This is what Angus initially said to me: The installer searches the Registry in various ways in order to find the whereabouts of sh.exe, gswinc.exe, python.exe, etc. It's blindingly obvious

Re: How to verify links on wiki.lyx? (Was: ...)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, Todd Denniston wrote: Oh, and it would be a good idea for someone to make sure all the links work correctly now... Does anyone know of a tool which would be useful to traverse a web site and check which links doesn't work? (In this case we

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

Stephen Harris wrote: > No, he did not. I'll get back to that. I appreciate your calm response. ;-) > This is what Angus initially said to me: > > "The installer searches the Registry in various ways in order to find the > whereabouts of sh.exe, gswinc.exe, python.exe, etc. It's blindingly >

Re: How to verify links on wiki.lyx? (Was: ...)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, Todd Denniston wrote: > >> Oh, and it would be a good idea for someone to make sure all the links >> work correctly now... > > Does anyone know of a tool which would be useful to traverse a web site > and check which links doesn't work? (In this

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

Stephen Harris wrote: - Original Message - From: Enrico Forestieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 5:17 PM Subject: Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into] because I think it is

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

Enrico Forestieri wrote: Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Formally, that's the PATH environment variable. To be honest, I don't think that I check the contents of this variable when generating the contents of \path_prefix. Clearly I should have Angus, you did a wonderful job. I

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

Stephen Harris wrote: On my computer, the contents of \path_prefix are a subset of the Windows PATH environment variable because I've manually added them. Checking the contents of PATH and comparing it to LyX's \path_prefix to determine accuracy seems awfully smart, like AI. The installer

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

Stephen Harris wrote: The installer searches the Registry in various ways in order to find the whereabouts of sh.exe, gswinc.exe, python.exe, etc. It's blindingly obvious that it should first ascertain whether these things are already in the PATH. Never mind ;-) By which I meant that I should

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

Stephen Harris wrote: - Original Message - From: Enrico Forestieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 5:17 PM Subject: Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into] because I think it is

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

Enrico Forestieri wrote: Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Formally, that's the PATH environment variable. To be honest, I don't think that I check the contents of this variable when generating the contents of \path_prefix. Clearly I should have Angus, you did a wonderful job. I

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

Stephen Harris wrote: On my computer, the contents of \path_prefix are a subset of the Windows PATH environment variable because I've manually added them. Checking the contents of PATH and comparing it to LyX's \path_prefix to determine accuracy seems awfully smart, like AI. The installer

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

Stephen Harris wrote: The installer searches the Registry in various ways in order to find the whereabouts of sh.exe, gswinc.exe, python.exe, etc. It's blindingly obvious that it should first ascertain whether these things are already in the PATH. Never mind ;-) By which I meant that I should

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

Stephen Harris wrote: > > - Original Message - > From: "Enrico Forestieri" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: > Sent: Monday, > December 12, 2005 5:17 PM Subject: Re: There's Something About > Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into] > > >>>

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

Enrico Forestieri wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Formally, that's the PATH environment variable. To be honest, I don't >> think that I check the contents of this variable when generating the >> contents of \path_prefix. Clearly I s

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

Stephen Harris wrote: > On my computer, the contents of \path_prefix are a subset of the > Windows PATH environment variable because I've manually added > them. Checking the contents of PATH and comparing it to LyX's > \path_prefix to determine accuracy seems awfully smart, like AI. The installer

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

Stephen Harris wrote: >> The installer searches the Registry in various ways in order to find the >> whereabouts of sh.exe, gswinc.exe, python.exe, etc. It's blindingly >> obvious that it should first ascertain whether these things are already >> in the PATH. Never mind ;-) By which I meant that

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

Tariq Kamal wrote: Hello! I'm a relatively new user to LyX (installed it a couple of months ago in my laptop, and I've barely scratched the surface of its functionality). As it was, I figured that installing LyX into my work system would be a good idea. So I downloaded the

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

Enrico Forestieri wrote: Angus, what about a configure.bat script? Y'know, sometimes the simplest ideas are the best ;-) However, don't we need admin privileges to generate files in C:\Program Files\LyX\Resources\lyx ? -- Angus

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

Tariq Kamal wrote: Hello! I'm a relatively new user to LyX (installed it a couple of months ago in my laptop, and I've barely scratched the surface of its functionality). As it was, I figured that installing LyX into my work system would be a good idea. So I downloaded the

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

Enrico Forestieri wrote: Angus, what about a configure.bat script? Y'know, sometimes the simplest ideas are the best ;-) However, don't we need admin privileges to generate files in C:\Program Files\LyX\Resources\lyx ? -- Angus

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

Tariq Kamal wrote: > Hello! > > I'm a relatively new user to LyX (installed it a couple of months ago > in my laptop, and I've barely scratched the surface of its > functionality). As it was, I figured that installing LyX into my work > system would be a good idea. So I downloaded the >

Re: There's Something About Textclass.lst [WinXP, installing into]

Enrico Forestieri wrote: > Angus, what about a configure.bat script? Y'know, sometimes the simplest ideas are the best ;-) However, don't we need admin privileges to generate files in C:\Program Files\LyX\Resources\lyx ? -- Angus

Re: Prerelease of LyX 1.3.7_5 for Windows

Stephen Harris wrote: The installation fails, saying it can't run the configure script. You *did* uninstall LyX 1.3.6 before trying to install the new version? Anyway, you can always fix the breakage by hand by typing cd C:/Program Files/LyX/Resources/lyx sh.exe configure In an MSYS

Re: Prerelease of LyX 1.3.7_5 for Windows

Stephen Harris wrote: The installation fails, saying it can't run the configure script. You *did* uninstall LyX 1.3.6 before trying to install the new version? Anyway, you can always fix the breakage by hand by typing cd C:/Program Files/LyX/Resources/lyx sh.exe configure In an MSYS

Re: Prerelease of LyX 1.3.7_5 for Windows

Stephen Harris wrote: > The installation fails, saying it can't run the configure script. You *did* uninstall LyX 1.3.6 before trying to install the new version? Anyway, you can always fix the breakage by hand by typing cd "C:/Program Files/LyX/Resources/lyx" sh.exe configure In an MSYS

Re: Forget Windows

Helge Hafting wrote: | $ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --with-frontend=qt --with-gnu-ld | --with-qt-includes=/usr/include/qt3 --disable-debug | --disable-concept-checks --enable-optimization=-O2 You should use '--disable-stdlib-debug' as well. that is a real time consumer, nice when developing

Re: WinInstaller 0.51

Geoffrey Lloyd wrote: The file in question is a Python script that is processed by python.exe on the fly. No compilation necessary. Ok sorry for my ignorance of how to use the diff. No need to apologise. Thanks for testing it out. I have now made the changes and it does indeed solve the

Re: Forget Windows

Helge Hafting wrote: | $ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --with-frontend=qt --with-gnu-ld | --with-qt-includes=/usr/include/qt3 --disable-debug | --disable-concept-checks --enable-optimization=-O2 You should use '--disable-stdlib-debug' as well. that is a real time consumer, nice when developing

Re: WinInstaller 0.51

Geoffrey Lloyd wrote: The file in question is a Python script that is processed by python.exe on the fly. No compilation necessary. Ok sorry for my ignorance of how to use the diff. No need to apologise. Thanks for testing it out. I have now made the changes and it does indeed solve the

Re: Forget Windows

Helge Hafting wrote: >>| $ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --with-frontend=qt --with-gnu-ld >>| --with-qt-includes=/usr/include/qt3 --disable-debug >>| --disable-concept-checks --enable-optimization=-O2 >>You should use '--disable-stdlib-debug' as well. that is a real time >>consumer, nice when

Re: WinInstaller 0.51

Geoffrey Lloyd wrote: >>> The file in question is a Python script that is processed by python.exe >>> on the fly. No compilation necessary. >> Ok sorry for my ignorance of how to use the diff. No need to apologise. Thanks for testing it out. >> I have now made the changes and it does indeed

Re: LyX wiki has been upgraded

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Also in Note for users of Windows 98, how do I make the footnote? Indeed, is there a clean and elegant way to make a footnote spanning several paragraphs? I've enabled footnotes now, see http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/Test/Footnote for an

Re: LyX wiki has been upgraded

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Seriously speaking though, you're approaching the limit of what's currently feasible now. I don't think this can be enabled, pmwiki isn't recursive enough. Greedy ol' me, huh? ;-) A third solution is to simply not use footnote markup.. If you only have one or

Re: WinInstaller 0.51

Geoffrey Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Another message I do seem to get is this- Consider installing the PyWin extension modules if you're irritated by windows appearing briefly I am not sure whether this is important This is a message produced by the preview generation script itself

Re: [announce] fifth release of the LyXWinInstaller

Stephen Harris wrote: http://aspell.net/ * Latest Version: GNU Aspell 0.60.4 (Released October, 2005) I belong to the Aspell mailing list and heard about .60 awhile ago. There was a reference to contacting someone for a .exe copy rather than general repository availability. So I downloaded

Re: [announce] fifth release of the LyXWinInstaller

On Wednesday 07 December 2005 22:05, Stephen Harris wrote: Stephen, just to clear up any confusion: LyX/Win doesn't use aspell.exe at all. It is linked statically against libaspell.a Now I am confused. I have a Aspell053Setup.exe and a en dictionary .exe. I thought these were required

Re: WinInstaller 0.51

Geoffrey Lloyd wrote: Stephen Harris wrote: If this is a problem with Ghostscript, rather than paths with spaces, or LyX, why did gswin32.exe 0lsypreview.ps work? Was Ghostscript used to create 0lsypreview.ps? Hmmm good point. Wherever Lyx is the temp directory still has paths with spaces

Re: LyX wiki has been upgraded

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Also in Note for users of Windows 98, how do I make the footnote? Indeed, is there a clean and elegant way to make a footnote spanning several paragraphs? I've enabled footnotes now, see http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/Test/Footnote for an

Re: LyX wiki has been upgraded

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Seriously speaking though, you're approaching the limit of what's currently feasible now. I don't think this can be enabled, pmwiki isn't recursive enough. Greedy ol' me, huh? ;-) A third solution is to simply not use footnote markup.. If you only have one or

Re: WinInstaller 0.51

Geoffrey Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Another message I do seem to get is this- Consider installing the PyWin extension modules if you're irritated by windows appearing briefly I am not sure whether this is important This is a message produced by the preview generation script itself

Re: [announce] fifth release of the LyXWinInstaller

Stephen Harris wrote: http://aspell.net/ * Latest Version: GNU Aspell 0.60.4 (Released October, 2005) I belong to the Aspell mailing list and heard about .60 awhile ago. There was a reference to contacting someone for a .exe copy rather than general repository availability. So I downloaded

Re: [announce] fifth release of the LyXWinInstaller

On Wednesday 07 December 2005 22:05, Stephen Harris wrote: Stephen, just to clear up any confusion: LyX/Win doesn't use aspell.exe at all. It is linked statically against libaspell.a Now I am confused. I have a Aspell053Setup.exe and a en dictionary .exe. I thought these were required

Re: WinInstaller 0.51

Geoffrey Lloyd wrote: Stephen Harris wrote: If this is a problem with Ghostscript, rather than paths with spaces, or LyX, why did gswin32.exe 0lsypreview.ps work? Was Ghostscript used to create 0lsypreview.ps? Hmmm good point. Wherever Lyx is the temp directory still has paths with spaces

Re: LyX wiki has been upgraded

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Also in "Note for users of Windows 98", how do I make the footnote? >> Indeed, is there a clean and elegant way to make a footnote >> spanning several paragraphs? > I've enabled footnotes now, see > http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/Test/Footnote > for an

Re: LyX wiki has been upgraded

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Seriously speaking though, you're approaching the limit of what's > currently feasible now. I don't think this can be enabled, pmwiki isn't > "recursive" enough. Greedy ol' me, huh? ;-) > A third solution is to simply not use footnote markup.. If you only have >

Re: WinInstaller 0.51

Geoffrey Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Another message I do seem to get is this- > Consider installing the PyWin extension modules if you're > irritated by windows appearing briefly > I am not sure whether this is important This is a message produced by the preview generation script

Re: [announce] fifth release of the LyXWinInstaller

Stephen Harris wrote: > http://aspell.net/ > * Latest Version: GNU Aspell 0.60.4 (Released October, 2005) > I belong to the Aspell mailing list and heard about .60 awhile ago. > There was a reference to contacting someone for a .exe copy rather > than general repository availability. So I

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >