Matej Cepl wrote:
On ètvrtek 26 duben 2001 3:49 Juha Siltala wrote:
This would reduce the traffic on this list by half :-)
Having toubles with PostScript and postscript fonts. Trying to
get working ae,aecompl package (I guess I am really addicted to
Computer Modern, so pslatex doesn't
On tvrtek 26 duben 2001 16:17 Herbert Voss wrote:
Latex while compiling complains something about missing
fonts, but it seems to me that a) when it is tetex, it
should work :-) (I mean package ae from tetex, should be
able to work with fonts from tetex, shouldn't it?), b) when
it is
Matej Cepl wrote:
On ètvrtek 26 duben 2001 3:49 Juha Siltala wrote:
This would reduce the traffic on this list by half :-)
Having toubles with PostScript and postscript fonts. Trying to
get working ae,aecompl package (I guess I am really addicted to
Computer Modern, so pslatex doesn't
On tvrtek 26 duben 2001 16:17 Herbert Voss wrote:
Latex while compiling complains something about missing
fonts, but it seems to me that a) when it is tetex, it
should work :-) (I mean package ae from tetex, should be
able to work with fonts from tetex, shouldn't it?), b) when
it is
Matej Cepl wrote:
>
> On ètvrtek 26 duben 2001 3:49 Juha Siltala wrote:
> > This would reduce the traffic on this list by half :-)
>
> Having toubles with PostScript and postscript fonts. Trying to
> get working ae,aecompl package (I guess I am really addicted to
> Computer Modern, so pslatex
On tvrtek 26 duben 2001 16:17 Herbert Voss wrote:
> > Latex while compiling complains something about missing
> > fonts, but it seems to me that a) when it is tetex, it
> > should work :-) (I mean package ae from tetex, should be
> > able to work with fonts from tetex, shouldn't it?), b) when
>
