On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Allan Rae wrote:
I'll give them that one for the moment (although Maple LaTeX import
apparently works) and we've had at least two different interested groups
start some work on this but they seem to have disappeared.
Who cares about proprietary Maple ;)
What would be
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 10:07:45 +0300 (EEST)
From: Tuukka Toivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: LyX Users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OT] TeXmacs? (or Maxima LyX)
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Allan Rae wrote:
I'll give them that one for the moment (although Maple LaTeX
You would get no ERT at all in LyX if reLyX was able to convert
{1}\over{\sqrt{3}} as \frac{1}{sqrt{3}}: this is more difficult...
Is it a weakness of reLyX (i.e. no implementation of math TeX constructs
in mathed ?).
That's not a job for reLyX, but for the mathed parser...
Andre'
--
I'll give them that one for the moment (although Maple LaTeX import
apparently works) and we've had at least two different interested groups
start some work on this but they seem to have disappeared.
Who cares about proprietary Maple ;)
Well, I care, since that's what I am using.
The
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Allan Rae wrote:
I'll give them that one for the moment (although Maple LaTeX import
apparently works) and we've had at least two different interested groups
start some work on this but they seem to have disappeared.
Who cares about proprietary Maple ;)
What would be
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 10:07:45 +0300 (EEST)
From: Tuukka Toivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: LyX Users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OT] TeXmacs? (or Maxima LyX)
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Allan Rae wrote:
I'll give them that one for the moment (although Maple LaTeX
You would get no ERT at all in LyX if reLyX was able to convert
{1}\over{\sqrt{3}} as \frac{1}{sqrt{3}}: this is more difficult...
Is it a weakness of reLyX (i.e. no implementation of math TeX constructs
in mathed ?).
That's not a job for reLyX, but for the mathed parser...
Andre'
--
I'll give them that one for the moment (although Maple LaTeX import
apparently works) and we've had at least two different interested groups
start some work on this but they seem to have disappeared.
Who cares about proprietary Maple ;)
Well, I care, since that's what I am using.
The
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Allan Rae wrote:
> I'll give them that one for the moment (although Maple LaTeX import
> apparently works) and we've had at least two different interested groups
> start some work on this but they seem to have disappeared.
Who cares about proprietary Maple ;)
What would be
>>Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 10:07:45 +0300 (EEST)
>>From: Tuukka Toivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>cc: LyX Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: Re: [OT] TeXmacs? (or Maxima & LyX)
>>
>>On W
> You would get no ERT at all in LyX if reLyX was able to convert
> {1}\over{\sqrt{3}} as \frac{1}{sqrt{3}}: this is more difficult...
> Is it a weakness of reLyX (i.e. no implementation of math TeX constructs
> in mathed ?).
That's not a job for reLyX, but for the mathed parser...
Andre'
--
> > I'll give them that one for the moment (although Maple LaTeX import
> > apparently works) and we've had at least two different interested groups
> > start some work on this but they seem to have disappeared.
>
> Who cares about proprietary Maple ;)
Well, I care, since that's what I am
12 matches
Mail list logo