Janus Sandsgaard wrote:
Ah. Thanks a lot. I was not aware of that. I guess I need to study a little
on the basics of BiB and LaTeX to understand what I am doing. Can you
recommend a (short) resource explaining me someting like:
- The difference between BiBteX, NatBib, JureBib etc.
Bibtex is
On Fri, 13 May 2005, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Janus Sandsgaard wrote:
Ah. Thanks a lot. I was not aware of that. I guess I need to study a little
on the basics of BiB and LaTeX to understand what I am doing. Can you
recommend a (short) resource explaining me someting like:
- The
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I copied parts of your post to this page
http://wiki.lyx.org/BibTeX/Background
I hope it is all historically correct.
/Christian
Btw, I assumed that you use a 'ü' in Spitzmüller...
certainly.
Jürgen.
On Fri, 13 May 2005, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I copied parts of your post to this page
http://wiki.lyx.org/BibTeX/Background
I hope it is all historically correct.
Well, I just quoted you ;-)
/C
--
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44
On Friday 13 May 2005 14:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I copied parts of your post to this page
Great. The answer from Jürgen is excellent.
Janus
--
Roskilde University, Denmark.
Department of Technology and Social Science.
International Development Studies.
ESST - Society, Science and
Janus Sandsgaard wrote:
Ah. Thanks a lot. I was not aware of that. I guess I need to study a little
on the basics of BiB and LaTeX to understand what I am doing. Can you
recommend a (short) resource explaining me someting like:
- The difference between BiBteX, NatBib, JureBib etc.
Bibtex is
On Fri, 13 May 2005, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Janus Sandsgaard wrote:
Ah. Thanks a lot. I was not aware of that. I guess I need to study a little
on the basics of BiB and LaTeX to understand what I am doing. Can you
recommend a (short) resource explaining me someting like:
- The
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I copied parts of your post to this page
http://wiki.lyx.org/BibTeX/Background
I hope it is all historically correct.
/Christian
Btw, I assumed that you use a 'ü' in Spitzmüller...
certainly.
Jürgen.
On Fri, 13 May 2005, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I copied parts of your post to this page
http://wiki.lyx.org/BibTeX/Background
I hope it is all historically correct.
Well, I just quoted you ;-)
/C
--
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44
On Friday 13 May 2005 14:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I copied parts of your post to this page
Great. The answer from Jürgen is excellent.
Janus
--
Roskilde University, Denmark.
Department of Technology and Social Science.
International Development Studies.
ESST - Society, Science and
Janus Sandsgaard wrote:
> Ah. Thanks a lot. I was not aware of that. I guess I need to study a little
> on the basics of BiB and LaTeX to understand what I am doing. Can you
> recommend a (short) resource explaining me someting like:
>
> - The difference between BiBteX, NatBib, JureBib etc.
On Fri, 13 May 2005, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Janus Sandsgaard wrote:
> > Ah. Thanks a lot. I was not aware of that. I guess I need to study a little
> > on the basics of BiB and LaTeX to understand what I am doing. Can you
> > recommend a (short) resource explaining me someting like:
> >
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I copied parts of your post to this page
>
> http://wiki.lyx.org/BibTeX/Background
I hope it is all historically correct.
> /Christian
>
> Btw, I assumed that you use a 'ü' in Spitzmüller...
certainly.
Jürgen.
On Fri, 13 May 2005, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I copied parts of your post to this page
> >
> > http://wiki.lyx.org/BibTeX/Background
>
> I hope it is all historically correct.
Well, I just quoted you ;-)
/C
--
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44
On Friday 13 May 2005 14:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I copied parts of your post to this page
Great. The answer from Jürgen is excellent.
Janus
--
Roskilde University, Denmark.
Department of Technology and Social Science.
International Development Studies.
ESST - Society, Science and
by inserting \nocite{*} as ERT in my LyX document. But this changes the look
of my bibliography from apalike - author (year) title - to a numerical
notation.
I am using NatBib with the autor-year option.
Style: apalike.
LyX 1.3.4 on Linux
Hi Janus;
Try adding this to the document preamble - it
On Thursday 12 May 2005 10:25, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Is the \nocite* ERT the only citation? LyX is calling natbib only if you
have inserted a citation inset.
No, the \nocite is not the only citation. There are a few normal citations in
the text as well.
There are two options:
- put
Janus Sandsgaard wrote:
On Thursday 12 May 2005 10:25, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Is the \nocite* ERT the only citation? LyX is calling natbib only if you
have inserted a citation inset.
No, the \nocite is not the only citation. There are a few normal
citations in the text as well.
On Thursday 12 May 2005 09:36, Rob S wrote:
Try adding this to the document preamble - it works using \nocite{*},
apalike and Natbib producing the output as you require:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED] , #2\fi)}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank. Now all my literature is listed in a apa like
Angus Leeming wrote:
Sorry. I do not understand what you mean by comment environment. Could
you please explain
Insert-Note[ Insert-Citation ]
Or (rather) Comment from the Layout combo box.
Jürgen
On Thursday 12 May 2005 20:07, Angus Leeming wrote:
Insert-Note[ Insert-Citation ]
Ah, ok.
Nope. LyX will only add \usepackage[...]{natbib} to the generated LaTeX
file if it sees that you have a citation entry.
OK. I already have a few citations in the text.
Janus
--
Roskilde
Janus Sandsgaard wrote:
Strange. It sounds a little like the
problem Meri Williams described in an posting on May 5, 2005.
Not strange at all. The problem is that apalike.bst has not been designed for
natbib, but for a different package (apacite.sty). So don't expect it to work
with natbib.
On Thursday 12 May 2005 20:35, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Not strange at all. The problem is that apalike.bst has not been designed
for natbib, but for a different package (apacite.sty). So don't expect it
to work with natbib.
Ah. Thanks a lot. I was not aware of that. I guess I need to
Janus Sandsgaard wrote:
On Thursday 12 May 2005 20:35, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Not strange at all. The problem is that apalike.bst has not been
designed for natbib, but for a different package (apacite.sty). So don't
expect it to work with natbib.
Ah. Thanks a lot. I was not aware of
by inserting \nocite{*} as ERT in my LyX document. But this changes the look
of my bibliography from apalike - author (year) title - to a numerical
notation.
I am using NatBib with the autor-year option.
Style: apalike.
LyX 1.3.4 on Linux
Hi Janus;
Try adding this to the document preamble - it
On Thursday 12 May 2005 10:25, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Is the \nocite* ERT the only citation? LyX is calling natbib only if you
have inserted a citation inset.
No, the \nocite is not the only citation. There are a few normal citations in
the text as well.
There are two options:
- put
Janus Sandsgaard wrote:
On Thursday 12 May 2005 10:25, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Is the \nocite* ERT the only citation? LyX is calling natbib only if you
have inserted a citation inset.
No, the \nocite is not the only citation. There are a few normal
citations in the text as well.
On Thursday 12 May 2005 09:36, Rob S wrote:
Try adding this to the document preamble - it works using \nocite{*},
apalike and Natbib producing the output as you require:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED] , #2\fi)}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank. Now all my literature is listed in a apa like
Angus Leeming wrote:
Sorry. I do not understand what you mean by comment environment. Could
you please explain
Insert-Note[ Insert-Citation ]
Or (rather) Comment from the Layout combo box.
Jürgen
On Thursday 12 May 2005 20:07, Angus Leeming wrote:
Insert-Note[ Insert-Citation ]
Ah, ok.
Nope. LyX will only add \usepackage[...]{natbib} to the generated LaTeX
file if it sees that you have a citation entry.
OK. I already have a few citations in the text.
Janus
--
Roskilde
Janus Sandsgaard wrote:
Strange. It sounds a little like the
problem Meri Williams described in an posting on May 5, 2005.
Not strange at all. The problem is that apalike.bst has not been designed for
natbib, but for a different package (apacite.sty). So don't expect it to work
with natbib.
On Thursday 12 May 2005 20:35, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Not strange at all. The problem is that apalike.bst has not been designed
for natbib, but for a different package (apacite.sty). So don't expect it
to work with natbib.
Ah. Thanks a lot. I was not aware of that. I guess I need to
Janus Sandsgaard wrote:
On Thursday 12 May 2005 20:35, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Not strange at all. The problem is that apalike.bst has not been
designed for natbib, but for a different package (apacite.sty). So don't
expect it to work with natbib.
Ah. Thanks a lot. I was not aware of
by inserting "\nocite{*}" as ERT in my LyX document. But this changes the look
of my bibliography from "apalike" - author (year) title - to a numerical
notation.
I am using NatBib with the "autor-year" option.
Style: "apalike".
LyX 1.3.4 on Linux
Hi Janus;
Try adding this to the document
On Thursday 12 May 2005 10:25, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Is the \nocite* ERT the only citation? LyX is calling natbib only if you
> have inserted a citation inset.
No, the \nocite is not the only citation. There are a few normal citations in
the text as well.
> There are two options:
> -
Janus Sandsgaard wrote:
> On Thursday 12 May 2005 10:25, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>
>> Is the \nocite* ERT the only citation? LyX is calling natbib only if you
>> have inserted a citation inset.
>
> No, the \nocite is not the only citation. There are a few normal
> citations in the text as
On Thursday 12 May 2005 09:36, Rob S wrote:
> Try adding this to the document preamble - it works using \nocite{*},
> apalike and Natbib producing the output as you require:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED] , #2\fi)}
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank. Now all my literature is listed in a apa like
Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Sorry. I do not understand what you mean by "comment environment". Could
> > you please explain
>
> Insert->Note[ Insert->Citation ]
Or (rather) "Comment" from the Layout combo box.
Jürgen
On Thursday 12 May 2005 20:07, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Insert->Note[ Insert->Citation ]
Ah, ok.
> Nope. LyX will only add "\usepackage[...]{natbib}" to the generated LaTeX
> file if it sees that you have a citation entry.
OK. I already have a few citations in the text.
Janus
--
Roskilde
Janus Sandsgaard wrote:
> Strange. It sounds a little like the
> problem Meri Williams described in an posting on May 5, 2005.
Not strange at all. The problem is that apalike.bst has not been designed for
natbib, but for a different package (apacite.sty). So don't expect it to work
with natbib.
On Thursday 12 May 2005 20:35, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Not strange at all. The problem is that apalike.bst has not been designed
> for natbib, but for a different package (apacite.sty). So don't expect it
> to work with natbib.
Ah. Thanks a lot. I was not aware of that. I guess I need to
Janus Sandsgaard wrote:
> On Thursday 12 May 2005 20:35, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>
>> Not strange at all. The problem is that apalike.bst has not been
>> designed for natbib, but for a different package (apacite.sty). So don't
>> expect it to work with natbib.
>
> Ah. Thanks a lot. I was
Hi there,
I would like to show all (or additional) literature from my bib-file in the
bibliography, and not just the literature I am citing. I have tried to follow
the advise at:
http://www.texnik.de//bibtex/bibtex.phtml#cite*
by inserting \nocite{*} as ERT in my LyX document. But this
Hi there,
I would like to show all (or additional) literature from my bib-file in the
bibliography, and not just the literature I am citing. I have tried to follow
the advise at:
http://www.texnik.de//bibtex/bibtex.phtml#cite*
by inserting \nocite{*} as ERT in my LyX document. But this
Hi there,
I would like to show all (or additional) literature from my bib-file in the
bibliography, and not just the literature I am citing. I have tried to follow
the advise at:
http://www.texnik.de//bibtex/bibtex.phtml#cite*
by inserting "\nocite{*}" as ERT in my LyX document. But this
45 matches
Mail list logo
