I would like to weigh in on this (not sure if this is the
right place). I really hope it would be possible to compile
in spite of bibtex errors. I have hundreds of
LyX files, and none of them compile any more.
Let's say I collaborate with a colleague (who uses
LaTeX). The colleague gives me a
To elaborate a little further. So, to
compile my file I have to correct my
colleagues bibtex errors. But when
he then sends me an updated bibtex
file, I have to make the corrections all
over again. Of course I could send him
back his corrected bibtex file, but
that has its own set of issues, and
Sorry, another example. I'm trying to make 2.1.0 work,
and correcting in BiBTeX, so I continually encounter issues.
Say you have two bibtex
files X.bib and Y.bib. Some documents
use X.bib, some use Y.bib. Now you make
a new document that uses both X.bib and Y.bib,
but they have some entries
Anders Host-Madsen wrote:
I really hope it would be possible to compile
in spite of bibtex errors.
It is, the change was reverted for final 2.1.0. Pavel
Pavel Sanda sanda at lyx.org writes:
It is, the change was reverted for final 2.1.0. Pavel
OK, thanks. It has given my a lot of headache.
I would like to weigh in on this (not sure if this is the
right place). I really hope it would be possible to compile
in spite of bibtex errors. I have hundreds of
LyX files, and none of them compile any more.
Let's say I collaborate with a colleague (who uses
LaTeX). The colleague gives me a
To elaborate a little further. So, to
compile my file I have to correct my
colleagues bibtex errors. But when
he then sends me an updated bibtex
file, I have to make the corrections all
over again. Of course I could send him
back his corrected bibtex file, but
that has its own set of issues, and
Sorry, another example. I'm trying to make 2.1.0 work,
and correcting in BiBTeX, so I continually encounter issues.
Say you have two bibtex
files X.bib and Y.bib. Some documents
use X.bib, some use Y.bib. Now you make
a new document that uses both X.bib and Y.bib,
but they have some entries
Anders Host-Madsen wrote:
I really hope it would be possible to compile
in spite of bibtex errors.
It is, the change was reverted for final 2.1.0. Pavel
Pavel Sanda sanda at lyx.org writes:
It is, the change was reverted for final 2.1.0. Pavel
OK, thanks. It has given my a lot of headache.
I would like to weigh in on this (not sure if this is the
right place). I really hope it would be possible to compile
in spite of bibtex errors. I have hundreds of
LyX files, and none of them compile any more.
Let's say I collaborate with a colleague (who uses
LaTeX). The colleague gives me a
To elaborate a little further. So, to
compile my file I have to correct my
colleagues bibtex errors. But when
he then sends me an updated bibtex
file, I have to make the corrections all
over again. Of course I could send him
back his corrected bibtex file, but
that has its own set of issues, and
Sorry, another example. I'm trying to make 2.1.0 work,
and correcting in BiBTeX, so I continually encounter issues.
Say you have two bibtex
files X.bib and Y.bib. Some documents
use X.bib, some use Y.bib. Now you make
a new document that uses both X.bib and Y.bib,
but they have some entries
Anders Host-Madsen wrote:
> I really hope it would be possible to compile
> in spite of bibtex errors.
It is, the change was reverted for final 2.1.0. Pavel
Pavel Sanda lyx.org> writes:
> It is, the change was reverted for final 2.1.0. Pavel
OK, thanks. It has given my a lot of headache.
15 matches
Mail list logo
