On Wed, 2023-09-06 at 09:21 +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> It would help if you could condense a minimal working exmaple that
> shows this bug.
The part of the document that triggers the problem is a table in case
that helps (probably not much).
> If you don't want to disclose the contents
Christopher Menzel schrieb am 06.09.2023 03:03 (GMT +02:00):
> Error message below, generated inside the terminal when I started lyx from
> the command line and tried to export my longish (614k) document to 2.3.x.
It would help if you could condense a minimal working exmaple that shows this
On 5 Sep 2023, at 5:01 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> On 9/5/23 16:45, Christopher Menzel wrote:
>> LyX folk,
>>
>> I recently compiled Lyx 2.4.0-beta5 under Linux and find that I am unable to
>> open the file in Lyx 2.4.0-beta3 under MacOS and the conversion script is
>> failing to export
On Tue, 2023-09-05 at 15:45 -0500, Christopher Menzel wrote:
> LyX folk,
>
> I recently compiled Lyx 2.4.0-beta5 under Linux and find that I am
> unable to open the file in Lyx 2.4.0-beta3 under MacOS and the
> conversion script is failing to export to 2.3.x. By changing
> "\lyxformat 618” to
On 9/5/23 16:45, Christopher Menzel wrote:
LyX folk,
I recently compiled Lyx 2.4.0-beta5 under Linux and find that I am unable to open the file in Lyx
2.4.0-beta3 under MacOS and the conversion script is failing to export to 2.3.x. By changing
"\lyxformat 618” to "\lyxformat 616” I was able
LyX folk,
I recently compiled Lyx 2.4.0-beta5 under Linux and find that I am unable to
open the file in Lyx 2.4.0-beta3 under MacOS and the conversion script is
failing to export to 2.3.x. By changing "\lyxformat 618” to "\lyxformat 616” I
was able to load the document in 2.4.0-beta3 although
