Hi,
Paul schrieb:
Also, the italic chapter names in the header at the top of every page
(memoir document class) were coming out as an embedded
NimbusRomNo9L-Regu-Slant_167 font for some reason. All other italic
text was just using a standard Times-Italic non-embedded font.
Nimbus Roman is
Karsten Heymann wrote:
Also, the italic chapter names in the header at the top of every page
(memoir document class) were coming out as an embedded
NimbusRomNo9L-Regu-Slant_167 font for some reason. All other italic
text was just using a standard Times-Italic non-embedded font.
Nimbus Roman
(I assumed the Reply-to: would be the list)
On 24/10/05, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any typographical reason why you might want slanted instead of
italic or vice-versa?
In the original edition describing TeX Knuth is very very strident
about the need for slanted fonts, the wave of
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sam Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
(I assumed the Reply-to: would be the list)
Bad assumption. The list isn't broken.
Knuth also argues in METAFONT that slanted will make it easier for
typeface designers to produce multiple faces from a single style.
So can they get a
On 25/10/05, Mike Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Knuth also argues in METAFONT that slanted will make it easier for
typeface designers to produce multiple faces from a single style.
So can they get a slanted face out of an MM font?
This is my recollection of Knuth's assertion[1]. Then
Hi,
Paul schrieb:
Also, the italic chapter names in the header at the top of every page
(memoir document class) were coming out as an embedded
NimbusRomNo9L-Regu-Slant_167 font for some reason. All other italic
text was just using a standard Times-Italic non-embedded font.
Nimbus Roman is
Karsten Heymann wrote:
Also, the italic chapter names in the header at the top of every page
(memoir document class) were coming out as an embedded
NimbusRomNo9L-Regu-Slant_167 font for some reason. All other italic
text was just using a standard Times-Italic non-embedded font.
Nimbus Roman
(I assumed the Reply-to: would be the list)
On 24/10/05, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any typographical reason why you might want slanted instead of
italic or vice-versa?
In the original edition describing TeX Knuth is very very strident
about the need for slanted fonts, the wave of
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sam Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
(I assumed the Reply-to: would be the list)
Bad assumption. The list isn't broken.
Knuth also argues in METAFONT that slanted will make it easier for
typeface designers to produce multiple faces from a single style.
So can they get a
On 25/10/05, Mike Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Knuth also argues in METAFONT that slanted will make it easier for
typeface designers to produce multiple faces from a single style.
So can they get a slanted face out of an MM font?
This is my recollection of Knuth's assertion[1]. Then
Hi,
Paul schrieb:
Also, the italic chapter names in the header at the top of every page
(memoir document class) were coming out as an embedded
NimbusRomNo9L-Regu-Slant_167 font for some reason. All other italic
text was just using a standard Times-Italic non-embedded font.
Nimbus Roman is
Karsten Heymann wrote:
>> Also, the italic chapter names in the header at the top of every page
>> (memoir document class) were coming out as an embedded
>> NimbusRomNo9L-Regu-Slant_167 font for some reason. All other italic
>> text was just using a standard Times-Italic non-embedded font.
>
>
(I assumed the Reply-to: would be the list)
On 24/10/05, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any typographical reason why you might want slanted instead of
> italic or vice-versa?
In the original edition describing TeX Knuth is very very strident
about the need for slanted fonts, the
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sam Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> (I assumed the Reply-to: would be the list)
Bad assumption. The list isn't broken.
> Knuth also argues in METAFONT that slanted will make it easier for
> typeface designers to produce multiple faces from a single style.
So can
On 25/10/05, Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Knuth also argues in METAFONT that slanted will make it easier for
> > typeface designers to produce multiple faces from a single style.
>
> So can they get a slanted face out of an MM font?
This is my recollection of Knuth's assertion[1].
Hi Paul,
Paul schrieb:
I'm trying to understand exactly how LaTeX handles fonts/typefaces.
Maybe you want to take http://www.tug.org/fonts/ as a starting point. An
extremely good read is the fonts chapter from book The LaTeX Companion
2nd. Ed.
Is there a way to see which fonts are available
Karsten Heymann wrote:
Is there a way to see which fonts are available to LaTeX?
Try thils link:
http://tug.org/TeXnik/mainFAQ.cgi?file=fonts/fonts
It shows ways of displaying all fonts found on the latex paths.
/johan
- Original Message -
From: Johan Ingvast [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Karsten Heymann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2005 7:16 AM
Subject: Re: Choice of fonts in LaTeX
Karsten Heymann wrote:
Is there a way to see which
Hi Paul,
Paul schrieb:
I'm trying to understand exactly how LaTeX handles fonts/typefaces.
Maybe you want to take http://www.tug.org/fonts/ as a starting point. An
extremely good read is the fonts chapter from book The LaTeX Companion
2nd. Ed.
Is there a way to see which fonts are available
Karsten Heymann wrote:
Is there a way to see which fonts are available to LaTeX?
Try thils link:
http://tug.org/TeXnik/mainFAQ.cgi?file=fonts/fonts
It shows ways of displaying all fonts found on the latex paths.
/johan
- Original Message -
From: Johan Ingvast [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Karsten Heymann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2005 7:16 AM
Subject: Re: Choice of fonts in LaTeX
Karsten Heymann wrote:
Is there a way to see which
Hi Paul,
Paul schrieb:
I'm trying to understand exactly how LaTeX handles fonts/typefaces.
Maybe you want to take http://www.tug.org/fonts/ as a starting point. An
extremely good read is the fonts chapter from book "The LaTeX Companion"
2nd. Ed.
Is there a way to see which fonts are
Karsten Heymann wrote:
Is there a way to see which fonts are available to LaTeX?
Try thils link:
http://tug.org/TeXnik/mainFAQ.cgi?file=fonts/fonts
It shows ways of displaying all fonts found on the latex paths.
/johan
- Original Message -
From: "Johan Ingvast" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Karsten Heymann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <lyx-users@lists.lyx.org>
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2005 7:16 AM
Subject: Re: Choice of fon
I'm trying to understand exactly how LaTeX handles fonts/typefaces.
Is there a way to see which fonts are available to LaTeX? I can see
several fonts in a /usr/share/texmf/fonts directory (I'm using Debian
Linux) and trying \usepackage{fontname} works for most of them, but not
all. There's also a
Paul wrote:
What I need to be sure is that users on different machines running
Windows or Mac, with different fonts installed, will still be able
to read the PDF document. For example, if they don't have Times or
New Century Schoolbook installed, will they still be able to view
them? Does it
Angus Leeming wrote:
http://www.etsimo.uniovi.es/pdf/six.htm
explains that the PDF standard defines 14 fonts as standard. A
standard-conforming reader will be able to display glyphs in these
fonts even if they are not embedded in the document.
OK so does that mean those fonts (Times,
Paul wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
http://www.etsimo.uniovi.es/pdf/six.htm
explains that the PDF standard defines 14 fonts as standard. A
standard-conforming reader will be able to display glyphs in these
fonts even if they are not embedded in the document.
OK so does that mean those fonts
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Paul wrote:
Most of my potential readership is going to be using Adobe Acrobat on
Windows I imagine. So if I use Times, will that be treated as different
from Times New Roman and cause problems for Windows users, or will it
silently substitute the font (possibly causing
Paul wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
http://www.etsimo.uniovi.es/pdf/six.htm
explains that the PDF standard defines 14 fonts as standard. A
standard-conforming reader will be able to display glyphs in these
fonts even if they are not embedded in the document.
OK so does that mean those fonts
On Oct 21, 2005, at 8:35 AM, Rich Shepard wrote:
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Paul wrote:
Most of my potential readership is going to be using Adobe Acrobat on
Windows I imagine. So if I use Times, will that be treated as
different
from Times New Roman and cause problems for Windows users, or will
Stefano Franchi wrote:
If you are willing to spend a few hours (well, more than a few) with
Ph. Lehmannn's FontInstallation Guide, you'll be able to install any
Postscript Type 1 font you may desire. It consists of a series of
tutorials for Fontinst. On the other hand, if portability is a
Paul wrote:
You said about sticking to basic PDF fonts, but I would have thought
that it would be the other way round - unusual fonts would be *more*
portable because they are actually embedded within the document.
I'm not sure that's necessarily true. I think it is up to the software
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Paul wrote:
You said about sticking to basic PDF fonts, but I would have thought
that it would be the other way round - unusual fonts would be *more*
portable because they are actually embedded within the document.
I'm not sure that's necessarily true. I think it is
I'm trying to understand exactly how LaTeX handles fonts/typefaces.
Is there a way to see which fonts are available to LaTeX? I can see
several fonts in a /usr/share/texmf/fonts directory (I'm using Debian
Linux) and trying \usepackage{fontname} works for most of them, but not
all. There's also a
Paul wrote:
What I need to be sure is that users on different machines running
Windows or Mac, with different fonts installed, will still be able
to read the PDF document. For example, if they don't have Times or
New Century Schoolbook installed, will they still be able to view
them? Does it
Angus Leeming wrote:
http://www.etsimo.uniovi.es/pdf/six.htm
explains that the PDF standard defines 14 fonts as standard. A
standard-conforming reader will be able to display glyphs in these
fonts even if they are not embedded in the document.
OK so does that mean those fonts (Times,
Paul wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
http://www.etsimo.uniovi.es/pdf/six.htm
explains that the PDF standard defines 14 fonts as standard. A
standard-conforming reader will be able to display glyphs in these
fonts even if they are not embedded in the document.
OK so does that mean those fonts
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Paul wrote:
Most of my potential readership is going to be using Adobe Acrobat on
Windows I imagine. So if I use Times, will that be treated as different
from Times New Roman and cause problems for Windows users, or will it
silently substitute the font (possibly causing
Paul wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
http://www.etsimo.uniovi.es/pdf/six.htm
explains that the PDF standard defines 14 fonts as standard. A
standard-conforming reader will be able to display glyphs in these
fonts even if they are not embedded in the document.
OK so does that mean those fonts
On Oct 21, 2005, at 8:35 AM, Rich Shepard wrote:
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Paul wrote:
Most of my potential readership is going to be using Adobe Acrobat on
Windows I imagine. So if I use Times, will that be treated as
different
from Times New Roman and cause problems for Windows users, or will
Stefano Franchi wrote:
If you are willing to spend a few hours (well, more than a few) with
Ph. Lehmannn's FontInstallation Guide, you'll be able to install any
Postscript Type 1 font you may desire. It consists of a series of
tutorials for Fontinst. On the other hand, if portability is a
Paul wrote:
You said about sticking to basic PDF fonts, but I would have thought
that it would be the other way round - unusual fonts would be *more*
portable because they are actually embedded within the document.
I'm not sure that's necessarily true. I think it is up to the software
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Paul wrote:
You said about sticking to basic PDF fonts, but I would have thought
that it would be the other way round - unusual fonts would be *more*
portable because they are actually embedded within the document.
I'm not sure that's necessarily true. I think it is
I'm trying to understand exactly how LaTeX handles fonts/typefaces.
Is there a way to see which fonts are available to LaTeX? I can see
several fonts in a /usr/share/texmf/fonts directory (I'm using Debian
Linux) and trying \usepackage{fontname} works for most of them, but not
all. There's also a
Paul wrote:
> What I need to be sure is that users on different machines running
> Windows or Mac, with different fonts installed, will still be able
> to read the PDF document. For example, if they don't have Times or
> New Century Schoolbook installed, will they still be able to view
> them?
Angus Leeming wrote:
> http://www.etsimo.uniovi.es/pdf/six.htm
> explains that the PDF standard defines 14 fonts as "standard". A
> standard-conforming reader will be able to display glyphs in these
> fonts even if they are not embedded in the document.
OK so does that mean those fonts (Times,
Paul wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>> http://www.etsimo.uniovi.es/pdf/six.htm
>> explains that the PDF standard defines 14 fonts as "standard". A
>> standard-conforming reader will be able to display glyphs in these
>> fonts even if they are not embedded in the document.
>
> OK so does that mean
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Paul wrote:
Most of my potential readership is going to be using Adobe Acrobat on
Windows I imagine. So if I use Times, will that be treated as different
from Times New Roman and cause problems for Windows users, or will it
silently substitute the font (possibly causing
Paul wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
http://www.etsimo.uniovi.es/pdf/six.htm
explains that the PDF standard defines 14 fonts as "standard". A
standard-conforming reader will be able to display glyphs in these
fonts even if they are not embedded in the document.
OK so does that mean those fonts
On Oct 21, 2005, at 8:35 AM, Rich Shepard wrote:
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Paul wrote:
Most of my potential readership is going to be using Adobe Acrobat on
Windows I imagine. So if I use Times, will that be treated as
different
from Times New Roman and cause problems for Windows users, or will
Stefano Franchi wrote:
> If you are willing to spend a few hours (well, more than a few) with
> Ph. Lehmannn's FontInstallation Guide, you'll be able to install any
> Postscript Type 1 font you may desire. It consists of a series of
> tutorials for Fontinst. On the other hand, if portability
Paul wrote:
You said about sticking to basic PDF fonts, but I would have thought
that it would be the other way round - unusual fonts would be *more*
portable because they are actually embedded within the document.
I'm not sure that's necessarily true. I think it is up to the software
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Paul wrote:
You said about sticking to basic PDF fonts, but I would have thought
that it would be the other way round - unusual fonts would be *more*
portable because they are actually embedded within the document.
I'm not sure that's necessarily true. I think it is
54 matches
Mail list logo
