Jean-Pierre Chretien wrote:
X-Originating-Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Curtis Osterhoudt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Graphics quality in PDF vs. PS, etc.
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 22:31:00 +
Hi, all,
I'm currently producing documents using LyX, in which
Jean-Pierre Chretien wrote:
X-Originating-Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Curtis Osterhoudt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Graphics quality in PDF vs. PS, etc.
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 22:31:00 +
Hi, all,
I'm currently producing documents using LyX, in which
Jean-Pierre Chretien wrote:
X-Originating-Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: "Curtis Osterhoudt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Graphics quality in PDF vs. PS, etc.
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 22:31:00 +
Hi, all,
I'm currently producing documents usi
Curtis Osterhoudt wrote:
On the other hand, the original problem remains: Why would
1. starting w/ an .eps image;
2. converting the .eps to .pdf using convert;
3. inserting the .pdf into LyX; then
4. exporting the whole document w/ pdflatex
X-Originating-Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Curtis Osterhoudt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Graphics quality in PDF vs. PS, etc.
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 22:31:00 +
Hi, all,
I'm currently producing documents using LyX, in which graphics are often
XFig figures. I
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
As I understood you, you insert the graphics as EPS in LyX and produce
then the PDF via pdflatex. I also use pdflatex for the PDF-output but
insert all graphics as PDF. This has the advantage that the compilation
process is much faster because JPG, PNG, and PDF-graphics can
From: Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: Graphics quality in PDF vs. PS, etc.
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:00:20 -0400
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
As I understood you, you insert the graphics as EPS in LyX and produce
then the PDF via pdflatex. I also use pdflatex
Curtis Osterhoudt wrote:
On the other hand, the original problem remains: Why would
1. starting w/ an .eps image;
2. converting the .eps to .pdf using convert;
3. inserting the .pdf into LyX; then
4. exporting the whole document w/ pdflatex
X-Originating-Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Curtis Osterhoudt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Graphics quality in PDF vs. PS, etc.
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 22:31:00 +
Hi, all,
I'm currently producing documents using LyX, in which graphics are often
XFig figures. I
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
As I understood you, you insert the graphics as EPS in LyX and produce
then the PDF via pdflatex. I also use pdflatex for the PDF-output but
insert all graphics as PDF. This has the advantage that the compilation
process is much faster because JPG, PNG, and PDF-graphics can
From: Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: Graphics quality in PDF vs. PS, etc.
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:00:20 -0400
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
As I understood you, you insert the graphics as EPS in LyX and produce
then the PDF via pdflatex. I also use pdflatex
Curtis Osterhoudt wrote:
> On the other hand, the original problem remains: Why would
> 1. starting w/ an .eps image;
> 2. converting the .eps to .pdf using "convert";
> 3. inserting the .pdf into LyX; then
> 4. exporting the whole document w/
>>X-Originating-Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>From: "Curtis Osterhoudt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
>>Subject: Graphics quality in PDF vs. PS, etc.
>>Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 22:31:00 +
>>
>>Hi, all,
>>
>
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
As I understood you, you insert the graphics as EPS in LyX and produce
then the PDF via pdflatex. I also use pdflatex for the PDF-output but
insert all graphics as PDF. This has the advantage that the compilation
process is much faster because JPG, PNG, and PDF-graphics can
From: "Paul A. Rubin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: Graphics quality in PDF vs. PS, etc.
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:00:20 -0400
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
As I understood you, you insert the graphics as EPS in LyX and produce
then the PDF via pdfl
Hi, all,
I'm currently producing documents using LyX, in which graphics are often
XFig figures. I like the fact that LaTeX fonts can be embedded in such
figures, and look great when the final document is produced*.
However, if such a figure is relatively complicated (for example, a large
Curtis Osterhoudt wrote:
I'm currently producing documents using LyX, in which graphics are
often XFig figures. I like the fact that LaTeX fonts can be embedded in
such figures, and look great when the final document is produced*.
However, if such a figure is relatively complicated (for
Original Message Follows
From: Uwe Stöhr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Curtis Osterhoudt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: Graphics quality in PDF vs. PS, etc.
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 02:31:30 +0200
Curtis Osterhoudt wrote:
I'm currently producing documents using
Hi, all,
I'm currently producing documents using LyX, in which graphics are often
XFig figures. I like the fact that LaTeX fonts can be embedded in such
figures, and look great when the final document is produced*.
However, if such a figure is relatively complicated (for example, a large
Curtis Osterhoudt wrote:
I'm currently producing documents using LyX, in which graphics are
often XFig figures. I like the fact that LaTeX fonts can be embedded in
such figures, and look great when the final document is produced*.
However, if such a figure is relatively complicated (for
Original Message Follows
From: Uwe Stöhr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Curtis Osterhoudt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: Graphics quality in PDF vs. PS, etc.
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 02:31:30 +0200
Curtis Osterhoudt wrote:
I'm currently producing documents using
Hi, all,
I'm currently producing documents using LyX, in which graphics are often
XFig figures. I like the fact that LaTeX fonts can be embedded in such
figures, and look great when the final document is produced*.
However, if such a figure is relatively complicated (for example, a large
Curtis Osterhoudt wrote:
I'm currently producing documents using LyX, in which graphics are
often XFig figures. I like the fact that LaTeX fonts can be embedded in
such figures, and look great when the final document is produced*.
However, if such a figure is relatively complicated (for
Original Message Follows
From: Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Curtis Osterhoudt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: Graphics quality in PDF vs. PS, etc.
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 02:31:30 +0200
Curtis Osterhoudt wrote:
I'm currently produci
24 matches
Mail list logo
