Rich == Rich Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rich That was it: names changed from prior versions. In a few
Rich cases, the words were reversed in the latest cua.bind, in others
Rich 'dialog-show' was prepended to the word. Sigh.
Do you know that, if you start from, say, cua.bind, the best
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Do you know that, if you start from, say, cua.bind, the best way to
produce your bindings is like this?
Incidentally, is it possible to include bind files? Something like
-mybindings.bind---
#my bindings
\bind F1 foo
Input cua.bind
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Incidentally, is it possible to include bind files?
After switching my brain on, I noticed that it's just what
\bind_file
does.
Sorry for the noise.
Jürgen
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
-mybindings.bind---
\bind_file cua.bind
#your bindings below
\bind F1 foo
---
JMarc,
No, I didn't.
What I did years ago was 'cp cua.bind my.bind' and change the latter. But,
despite
Rich == Rich Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rich Even if I append my key bindings to the latest cua.bind, don't
Rich I still need to figure out syntactical changes? For example,
Rich prior function name was 'spellchecker' while the new function
Rich name is 'display-show spellchecker.' So,
Rich == Rich Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rich That was it: names changed from prior versions. In a few
Rich cases, the words were reversed in the latest cua.bind, in others
Rich 'dialog-show' was prepended to the word. Sigh.
Do you know that, if you start from, say, cua.bind, the best
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Do you know that, if you start from, say, cua.bind, the best way to
produce your bindings is like this?
Incidentally, is it possible to include bind files? Something like
-mybindings.bind---
#my bindings
\bind F1 foo
Input cua.bind
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Incidentally, is it possible to include bind files?
After switching my brain on, I noticed that it's just what
\bind_file
does.
Sorry for the noise.
Jürgen
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
-mybindings.bind---
\bind_file cua.bind
#your bindings below
\bind F1 foo
---
JMarc,
No, I didn't.
What I did years ago was 'cp cua.bind my.bind' and change the latter. But,
despite
Rich == Rich Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rich Even if I append my key bindings to the latest cua.bind, don't
Rich I still need to figure out syntactical changes? For example,
Rich prior function name was 'spellchecker' while the new function
Rich name is 'display-show spellchecker.' So,
> "Rich" == Rich Shepard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rich> That was it: names changed from prior versions. In a few
Rich> cases, the words were reversed in the latest cua.bind, in others
Rich> 'dialog-show' was prepended to the word. Sigh.
Do you know that, if you start from, say,
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Do you know that, if you start from, say, cua.bind, the best way to
> produce your bindings is like this?
Incidentally, is it possible to include bind files? Something like
-mybindings.bind---
#my bindings
\bind "F1" "foo"
Input cua.bind
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Incidentally, is it possible to include bind files?
After switching my brain on, I noticed that it's just what
\bind_file
does.
Sorry for the noise.
Jürgen
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
-mybindings.bind---
\bind_file cua.bind
#your bindings below
\bind "F1" "foo"
---
JMarc,
No, I didn't.
What I did years ago was 'cp cua.bind my.bind' and change the latter. But,
> "Rich" == Rich Shepard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rich> Even if I append my key bindings to the latest cua.bind, don't
Rich> I still need to figure out syntactical changes? For example,
Rich> prior function name was 'spellchecker' while the new function
Rich> name is 'display-show
Rich == Rich Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rich This is frustrating: in 1.4.1 (linux), some of my shortcut
Rich keys no longer work. Same bind file as before. Some that do work
Rich include: C-d View dvi output C-i Italics (emphasize) C-b Bold
Rich C-h Compile with pdflatex
Rich Some
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Did you make your own bindings file? Some of the LyX functions changed
names.
JMarc,
That was it: names changed from prior versions. In a few cases, the words
were reversed in the latest cua.bind, in others 'dialog-show' was prepended
to the
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Rich == Rich Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rich This is frustrating: in 1.4.1 (linux), some of my shortcut
Rich keys no longer work. Same bind file as before. Some that do work
Rich include: C-d View dvi output C-i Italics (emphasize) C-b Bold
Rich C-h Compile
Rich == Rich Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rich This is frustrating: in 1.4.1 (linux), some of my shortcut
Rich keys no longer work. Same bind file as before. Some that do work
Rich include: C-d View dvi output C-i Italics (emphasize) C-b Bold
Rich C-h Compile with pdflatex
Rich Some
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Did you make your own bindings file? Some of the LyX functions changed
names.
JMarc,
That was it: names changed from prior versions. In a few cases, the words
were reversed in the latest cua.bind, in others 'dialog-show' was prepended
to the
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Rich == Rich Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rich This is frustrating: in 1.4.1 (linux), some of my shortcut
Rich keys no longer work. Same bind file as before. Some that do work
Rich include: C-d View dvi output C-i Italics (emphasize) C-b Bold
Rich C-h Compile
> "Rich" == Rich Shepard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rich> This is frustrating: in 1.4.1 (linux), some of my shortcut
Rich> keys no longer work. Same bind file as before. Some that do work
Rich> include: C-d View dvi output C-i Italics (emphasize) C-b Bold
Rich> C-h Compile with pdflatex
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Did you make your own bindings file? Some of the LyX functions changed
names.
JMarc,
That was it: names changed from prior versions. In a few cases, the words
were reversed in the latest cua.bind, in others 'dialog-show' was prepended
to the
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Rich" == Rich Shepard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rich> This is frustrating: in 1.4.1 (linux), some of my shortcut
Rich> keys no longer work. Same bind file as before. Some that do work
Rich> include: C-d View dvi output C-i Italics (emphasize) C-b Bold
Rich> C-h
This is frustrating: in 1.4.1 (linux), some of my shortcut keys no longer
work. Same bind file as before. Some that do work include:
C-d View dvi output
C-i Italics (emphasize)
C-b Bold
C-h Compile with pdflatex
Some that no longer work include:
C-f Find
F7
This is frustrating: in 1.4.1 (linux), some of my shortcut keys no longer
work. Same bind file as before. Some that do work include:
C-d View dvi output
C-i Italics (emphasize)
C-b Bold
C-h Compile with pdflatex
Some that no longer work include:
C-f Find
F7
This is frustrating: in 1.4.1 (linux), some of my shortcut keys no longer
work. Same bind file as before. Some that do work include:
C-d View dvi output
C-i Italics (emphasize)
C-b Bold
C-h Compile with pdflatex
Some that no longer work include:
C-f Find
F7
27 matches
Mail list logo
