On 4/3/11 4:30 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
[...]
As it was suggested earlier, it should be easy to track down all the
modifications that the editor performed: use a graphical interface to
dfif (such as Meld [1]) to compare the tex file that you sent
(original) with the tex that you received
On 4/3/11 4:30 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
[...]
As it was suggested earlier, it should be easy to track down all the
modifications that the editor performed: use a graphical interface to
dfif (such as Meld [1]) to compare the tex file that you sent
(original) with the tex that you received
On 4/3/11 4:30 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
[...]
> As it was suggested earlier, it should be easy to track down all the
> modifications that the editor performed: use a graphical interface to
> dfif (such as Meld [1]) to compare the tex file that you sent
> (original) with the tex that you received
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Bruce Pourciau
bruce.h.pourc...@lawrence.edu wrote:
A journal has the tex file I exported from my lyx file. Their editing
process goes like this: they mark places in that tex file where they want
revisions, attach it to an email to me, I make the revisions in
On Apr 2, 2011, at 8:55 AM, Bruce Pourciau wrote:
A journal has the tex file I exported from my lyx file. Their
editing process goes like this: they mark places in that tex file
where they want revisions, attach it to an email to me, I make the
revisions in that marked up tex file and
On 02/04/2011 9:55 AM, Bruce Pourciau wrote:
A journal has the tex file I exported from my lyx file. Their editing
process goes like this: they mark places in that tex file where they
want revisions, attach it to an email to me, I make the revisions in
that marked up tex file and send it back to
Save yourself from the tex - lyx - tex cycle, as it is known to be
incomplete. So I see two ways forward (not counting the Word alternative)
1) Use your original LyX file. Always only modify the original LyX file,
and use .tex at the last stage (export). For this method, you will first
Bruce,
First of all I would use LyX's version control system.
Secondly there are programs around to compare two tex files
and write out the differences, which should help you with
the editing, which I would then continue to do within LyX.
el
On 2011-04-02 15:55 , Bruce Pourciau wrote:
A
On Saturday 02 April 2011 11:03:00 Julien Rioux wrote:
On 02/04/2011 9:55 AM, Bruce Pourciau wrote:
A journal has the tex file I exported from my lyx file. Their editing
process goes like this: they mark places in that tex file where they
want revisions, attach it to an email to me, I make
On Apr 2, 2011, at 2:13 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
On Saturday 02 April 2011 11:03:00 Julien Rioux wrote:
On 02/04/2011 9:55 AM, Bruce Pourciau wrote:
A journal has the tex file I exported from my lyx file. Their
editing
process goes like this: they mark places in that tex file where they
want
On 2011-04-02, Bruce Pourciau wrote:
Let me add this: The editors don't expect the author of a Word
submission to conduct the revision process in an unfamiliar file
format. I'm sure they go back and forth with Word files. But they are
trying to force me to conduct the editing process in
On Apr 2, 2011, at 4:05 PM, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2011-04-02, Bruce Pourciau wrote:
Let me add this: The editors don't expect the author of a Word
submission to conduct the revision process in an unfamiliar file
format. I'm sure they go back and forth with Word files. But they are
trying
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Bruce Pourciau
bruce.h.pourc...@lawrence.edu wrote:
Thank you for the suggestions! I'll have to ponder. What I'd really like is
to go old school: Have them mark up the pdf with a pen, send it to me, I
make the revisions in the lyx file, export tex, send the tex
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Bruce Pourciau
bruce.h.pourc...@lawrence.edu wrote:
A journal has the tex file I exported from my lyx file. Their editing
process goes like this: they mark places in that tex file where they want
revisions, attach it to an email to me, I make the revisions in
On Apr 2, 2011, at 8:55 AM, Bruce Pourciau wrote:
A journal has the tex file I exported from my lyx file. Their
editing process goes like this: they mark places in that tex file
where they want revisions, attach it to an email to me, I make the
revisions in that marked up tex file and
On 02/04/2011 9:55 AM, Bruce Pourciau wrote:
A journal has the tex file I exported from my lyx file. Their editing
process goes like this: they mark places in that tex file where they
want revisions, attach it to an email to me, I make the revisions in
that marked up tex file and send it back to
Save yourself from the tex - lyx - tex cycle, as it is known to be
incomplete. So I see two ways forward (not counting the Word alternative)
1) Use your original LyX file. Always only modify the original LyX file,
and use .tex at the last stage (export). For this method, you will first
Bruce,
First of all I would use LyX's version control system.
Secondly there are programs around to compare two tex files
and write out the differences, which should help you with
the editing, which I would then continue to do within LyX.
el
On 2011-04-02 15:55 , Bruce Pourciau wrote:
A
On Saturday 02 April 2011 11:03:00 Julien Rioux wrote:
On 02/04/2011 9:55 AM, Bruce Pourciau wrote:
A journal has the tex file I exported from my lyx file. Their editing
process goes like this: they mark places in that tex file where they
want revisions, attach it to an email to me, I make
On Apr 2, 2011, at 2:13 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
On Saturday 02 April 2011 11:03:00 Julien Rioux wrote:
On 02/04/2011 9:55 AM, Bruce Pourciau wrote:
A journal has the tex file I exported from my lyx file. Their
editing
process goes like this: they mark places in that tex file where they
want
On 2011-04-02, Bruce Pourciau wrote:
Let me add this: The editors don't expect the author of a Word
submission to conduct the revision process in an unfamiliar file
format. I'm sure they go back and forth with Word files. But they are
trying to force me to conduct the editing process in
On Apr 2, 2011, at 4:05 PM, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2011-04-02, Bruce Pourciau wrote:
Let me add this: The editors don't expect the author of a Word
submission to conduct the revision process in an unfamiliar file
format. I'm sure they go back and forth with Word files. But they are
trying
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Bruce Pourciau
bruce.h.pourc...@lawrence.edu wrote:
Thank you for the suggestions! I'll have to ponder. What I'd really like is
to go old school: Have them mark up the pdf with a pen, send it to me, I
make the revisions in the lyx file, export tex, send the tex
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Bruce Pourciau
wrote:
> A journal has the tex file I exported from my lyx file. Their editing
> process goes like this: they mark places in that tex file where they want
> revisions, attach it to an email to me, I make the revisions
On Apr 2, 2011, at 8:55 AM, Bruce Pourciau wrote:
A journal has the tex file I exported from my lyx file. Their
editing process goes like this: they mark places in that tex file
where they want revisions, attach it to an email to me, I make the
revisions in that marked up tex file and
On 02/04/2011 9:55 AM, Bruce Pourciau wrote:
A journal has the tex file I exported from my lyx file. Their editing
process goes like this: they mark places in that tex file where they
want revisions, attach it to an email to me, I make the revisions in
that marked up tex file and send it back to
>
>
> Save yourself from the tex -> lyx -> tex cycle, as it is known to be
> incomplete. So I see two ways forward (not counting the Word alternative)
>
> 1) Use your original LyX file. Always only modify the original LyX file,
> and use .tex at the last stage (export). For this method, you will
Bruce,
First of all I would use LyX's version control system.
Secondly there are programs around to compare two tex files
and write out the differences, which should help you with
the editing, which I would then continue to do within LyX.
el
On 2011-04-02 15:55 , Bruce Pourciau wrote:
> A
On Saturday 02 April 2011 11:03:00 Julien Rioux wrote:
> On 02/04/2011 9:55 AM, Bruce Pourciau wrote:
> > A journal has the tex file I exported from my lyx file. Their editing
> > process goes like this: they mark places in that tex file where they
> > want revisions, attach it to an email to me,
On Apr 2, 2011, at 2:13 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
On Saturday 02 April 2011 11:03:00 Julien Rioux wrote:
On 02/04/2011 9:55 AM, Bruce Pourciau wrote:
A journal has the tex file I exported from my lyx file. Their
editing
process goes like this: they mark places in that tex file where they
want
On 2011-04-02, Bruce Pourciau wrote:
> Let me add this: The editors don't expect the author of a Word
> submission to conduct the revision process in an unfamiliar file
> format. I'm sure they go back and forth with Word files. But they are
> trying to force me to conduct the editing
On Apr 2, 2011, at 4:05 PM, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2011-04-02, Bruce Pourciau wrote:
Let me add this: The editors don't expect the author of a Word
submission to conduct the revision process in an unfamiliar file
format. I'm sure they go back and forth with Word files. But they are
trying
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Bruce Pourciau
wrote:
> Thank you for the suggestions! I'll have to ponder. What I'd really like is
> to go "old school": Have them mark up the pdf with a pen, send it to me, I
> make the revisions in the lyx file, export tex, send
33 matches
Mail list logo