"William" == William Adler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
William Is there a binary version for solaris 2.6 or 2.7? I am trying
William to compile lyx 1-1.6 on a 2.6 machine using egcs-2.91 and I
William keep running into class errors on stdexcept? Since I am not a
William C++
William programmer I
"William" == William Adler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
William Is there a binary version for solaris 2.6 or 2.7? I am trying
William to compile lyx 1-1.6 on a 2.6 machine using egcs-2.91 and I
William keep running into class errors on stdexcept? Since I am not a
William C++
William programmer I
> "William" == William Adler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
William> Is there a binary version for solaris 2.6 or 2.7? I am trying
William> to compile lyx 1-1.6 on a 2.6 machine using egcs-2.91 and I
William> keep running into class errors on stdexcept? Since I am not a
William> C++
William>
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, John Levon wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Adam Huffman wrote:
You are using the RedHat xforms RPMs? If so, I had a similar problem
with them, and solved it by using an older set of xforms RPMs, currently
0.88-9
This is indeed the problem, the xforms headers include
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, John Levon wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Adam Huffman wrote:
You are using the RedHat xforms RPMs? If so, I had a similar problem
with them, and solved it by using an older set of xforms RPMs, currently
0.88-9
This is indeed the problem, the xforms headers include
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Adam Huffman wrote:
>
> > You are using the RedHat xforms RPMs? If so, I had a similar problem
> > with them, and solved it by using an older set of xforms RPMs, currently
> > 0.88-9
>
> This is indeed the problem, the xforms
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Adam Huffman wrote:
You are using the RedHat xforms RPMs? If so, I had a similar problem
with them, and solved it by using an older set of xforms RPMs, currently
0.88-9
This is indeed the problem, the xforms headers include a file they don't
need to, which breaks the
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, John Levon wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Adam Huffman wrote:
You are using the RedHat xforms RPMs? If so, I had a similar problem
with them, and solved it by using an older set of xforms RPMs, currently
0.88-9
This is indeed the problem, the xforms headers
"Lior" == Lior Silberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lior Note that the solution suggested was to use an _earlier_ version
Lior of xforms, while your patch says to get a more recent one. I can
Lior vouch for 0.88-9 (works for me here). I think that there were
Lior problems with 0.89-0 or
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Adam Huffman wrote:
You are using the RedHat xforms RPMs? If so, I had a similar problem
with them, and solved it by using an older set of xforms RPMs, currently
0.88-9
This is indeed the problem, the xforms headers include a file they don't
need to, which breaks the
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, John Levon wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Adam Huffman wrote:
You are using the RedHat xforms RPMs? If so, I had a similar problem
with them, and solved it by using an older set of xforms RPMs, currently
0.88-9
This is indeed the problem, the xforms headers
"Lior" == Lior Silberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lior Note that the solution suggested was to use an _earlier_ version
Lior of xforms, while your patch says to get a more recent one. I can
Lior vouch for 0.88-9 (works for me here). I think that there were
Lior problems with 0.89-0 or
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Adam Huffman wrote:
> You are using the RedHat xforms RPMs? If so, I had a similar problem
> with them, and solved it by using an older set of xforms RPMs, currently
> 0.88-9
This is indeed the problem, the xforms headers include a file they don't
need to, which breaks the
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Adam Huffman wrote:
>
> > You are using the RedHat xforms RPMs? If so, I had a similar problem
> > with them, and solved it by using an older set of xforms RPMs, currently
> > 0.88-9
>
> This is indeed the problem, the xforms
> "Lior" == Lior Silberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lior> Note that the solution suggested was to use an _earlier_ version
Lior> of xforms, while your patch says to get a more recent one. I can
Lior> vouch for 0.88-9 (works for me here). I think that there were
Lior> problems with 0.89-0
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, David wrote:
Ok folks, I give up. I can't build 1.1.6. I know, I know, it's not rocket
science. Take your best shot and then maybe help me out?
./configure in the lyx-1.1.6 directory gets me "cannot find libforms or
libxforms - cannot find forms.h"
I got the latest
Dear David,
Had the same problems installing Lyx 1.1.6 to Debian 2.2.
Here is the hack that led to "successful" (but not debianized) install:
download SuSe 6.4 version of xpm
as root use mc to see the .tar.gz xpm.rpm file
use mc to COPY the libraries into their destination directories, which
I seem to remember that the 'forms.h' include file comes in the
xforms-devel package. Therefore you need xforms-devel-0.88-15 in addition
to the package you already have (which has the library)
Lior.
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, David wrote:
Ok folks, I give up. I can't build 1.1.6. I know, I know,
Yes, I needed that and it got me past the configure step but now during 'make'
I'm getting another error, something to do with 'Object' ???
Some of the text looks like this:
In file included from formula.C:30:
../../src/minibuffer.h:17: using directive 'Object' introduced
ambiguous type
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, David wrote:
Yes, I needed that and it got me past the configure step but now during 'make'
I'm getting another error, something to do with 'Object' ???
Some of the text looks like this:
In file included from formula.C:30:
../../src/minibuffer.h:17: using directive
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, David wrote:
Ok folks, I give up. I can't build 1.1.6. I know, I know, it's not rocket
science. Take your best shot and then maybe help me out?
./configure in the lyx-1.1.6 directory gets me "cannot find libforms or
libxforms - cannot find forms.h"
I got the latest
Dear David,
Had the same problems installing Lyx 1.1.6 to Debian 2.2.
Here is the hack that led to "successful" (but not debianized) install:
download SuSe 6.4 version of xpm
as root use mc to see the .tar.gz xpm.rpm file
use mc to COPY the libraries into their destination directories, which
I seem to remember that the 'forms.h' include file comes in the
xforms-devel package. Therefore you need xforms-devel-0.88-15 in addition
to the package you already have (which has the library)
Lior.
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, David wrote:
Ok folks, I give up. I can't build 1.1.6. I know, I know,
Yes, I needed that and it got me past the configure step but now during 'make'
I'm getting another error, something to do with 'Object' ???
Some of the text looks like this:
In file included from formula.C:30:
../../src/minibuffer.h:17: using directive 'Object' introduced
ambiguous type
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, David wrote:
Yes, I needed that and it got me past the configure step but now during 'make'
I'm getting another error, something to do with 'Object' ???
Some of the text looks like this:
In file included from formula.C:30:
../../src/minibuffer.h:17: using directive
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, David wrote:
> Ok folks, I give up. I can't build 1.1.6. I know, I know, it's not rocket
> science. Take your best shot and then maybe help me out?
>
> ./configure in the lyx-1.1.6 directory gets me "cannot find libforms or
> libxforms - cannot find forms.h"
>
> I got the
Dear David,
Had the same problems installing Lyx 1.1.6 to Debian 2.2.
Here is the hack that led to "successful" (but not debianized) install:
download SuSe 6.4 version of xpm
as root use mc to see the .tar.gz xpm.rpm file
use mc to COPY the libraries into their destination directories, which
I seem to remember that the 'forms.h' include file comes in the
xforms-devel package. Therefore you need xforms-devel-0.88-15 in addition
to the package you already have (which has the library)
Lior.
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, David wrote:
> Ok folks, I give up. I can't build 1.1.6. I know, I know,
Yes, I needed that and it got me past the configure step but now during 'make'
I'm getting another error, something to do with 'Object' ???
Some of the text looks like this:
In file included from formula.C:30:
../../src/minibuffer.h:17: using directive 'Object' introduced
ambiguous type
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, David wrote:
> Yes, I needed that and it got me past the configure step but now during 'make'
> I'm getting another error, something to do with 'Object' ???
> Some of the text looks like this:
>
> In file included from formula.C:30:
> ../../src/minibuffer.h:17: using
30 matches
Mail list logo
