> > > And I say this as a LyX-only writer for the past 15 years or so.
> >
> > The first public LyX version was when? Can't have been much longer
> > than 10 years ago.
That was a typo and should have been 15, as the original message said.
I know Lyrix was implemented first using XForms some
Kids.!
Remember SGML on the IBM mainframe?
And did you know that you could use IBM punch cards as postcards?
From: Wolfgang Keller <felip...@gmx.net>
To: LyX Users List <lyx-users@lists.lyx.org>
Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2013 9:01:08 AM
Subject:
On 08/25/2013 09:01 AM, Wolfgang Keller wrote:
That was a typo and should have been 15, as the original message said.
I know Lyrix was implemented first using XForms some time late in the
90s, but it must have been after 1995.
Not exactly. It began either in 95 or earlier, and the original
22/08/2013 21:09, Steve Litt of Troubleshooters.Com:
Yeah, now that you mention it, I remember KLyX. Thank you, thank you,
THANK YOU for winning that battle!
The problem was not only around KDE (although there were ideological
ideas behind this port that we did not share), but rather that we
Went and had a look,
I can find LyX documents from 2000 having survived transitions through a
number of Linux distributions and machines, to a number of Macs.
:-)-O
el
on 2013-08-21 17:53 stefano franchi said the following:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Wolfgang Keller felip...@gmx.net
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 17:26:31 -0700
Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net wrote:
On Aug 21, 2013, at 5:16 AM, Les Denham lden...@hal-pc.org wrote:
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:13:23 -0700
Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net wrote:
On Aug 18, 2013, at 6:59 PM, Les Denham lden...@hal-pc.org wrote:
My
On Fri, 23 Aug 2013 10:20:06 +0200
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote:
22/08/2013 21:09, Steve Litt of Troubleshooters.Com:
Yeah, now that you mention it, I remember KLyX. Thank you, thank
you, THANK YOU for winning that battle!
The problem was not only around KDE (although
On Aug 23, 2013, at 7:28 AM, Les Denham lden...@hal-pc.org wrote:
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 17:26:31 -0700
Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net wrote:
On Aug 21, 2013, at 5:16 AM, Les Denham lden...@hal-pc.org wrote:
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:13:23 -0700
Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net wrote:
On Aug 18,
22/08/2013 21:09, Steve Litt of Troubleshooters.Com:
Yeah, now that you mention it, I remember KLyX. Thank you, thank you,
THANK YOU for winning that battle!
The problem was not only around KDE (although there were ideological
ideas behind this port that we did not share), but rather that we
Went and had a look,
I can find LyX documents from 2000 having survived transitions through a
number of Linux distributions and machines, to a number of Macs.
:-)-O
el
on 2013-08-21 17:53 stefano franchi said the following:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Wolfgang Keller felip...@gmx.net
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 17:26:31 -0700
Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net wrote:
On Aug 21, 2013, at 5:16 AM, Les Denham lden...@hal-pc.org wrote:
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:13:23 -0700
Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net wrote:
On Aug 18, 2013, at 6:59 PM, Les Denham lden...@hal-pc.org wrote:
My
On Fri, 23 Aug 2013 10:20:06 +0200
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote:
22/08/2013 21:09, Steve Litt of Troubleshooters.Com:
Yeah, now that you mention it, I remember KLyX. Thank you, thank
you, THANK YOU for winning that battle!
The problem was not only around KDE (although
On Aug 23, 2013, at 7:28 AM, Les Denham lden...@hal-pc.org wrote:
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 17:26:31 -0700
Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net wrote:
On Aug 21, 2013, at 5:16 AM, Les Denham lden...@hal-pc.org wrote:
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:13:23 -0700
Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net wrote:
On Aug 18,
22/08/2013 21:09, Steve Litt of Troubleshooters.Com:
Yeah, now that you mention it, I remember KLyX. Thank you, thank you,
THANK YOU for winning that battle!
The problem was not only around KDE (although there were ideological
ideas behind this port that we did not share), but rather that we
Went and had a look,
I can find LyX documents from 2000 having survived transitions through a
number of Linux distributions and machines, to a number of Macs.
:-)-O
el
on 2013-08-21 17:53 stefano franchi said the following:
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Wolfgang Keller
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 17:26:31 -0700
Jerry wrote:
>
> On Aug 21, 2013, at 5:16 AM, Les Denham wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:13:23 -0700
> > Jerry wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Aug 18, 2013, at 6:59 PM, Les Denham
On Fri, 23 Aug 2013 10:20:06 +0200
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> 22/08/2013 21:09, Steve Litt of Troubleshooters.Com:
> > Yeah, now that you mention it, I remember KLyX. Thank you, thank
> > you, THANK YOU for winning that battle!
>
> The problem was not only around KDE
On Aug 23, 2013, at 7:28 AM, Les Denham wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 17:26:31 -0700
> Jerry wrote:
>
>>
>> On Aug 21, 2013, at 5:16 AM, Les Denham wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:13:23 -0700
>>> Jerry
Am Wednesday, 21. August 2013, 18:53:58 schrieb stefano franchi:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Wolfgang Keller felip...@gmx.net
wrote:
And I say this as a LyX-only writer for the past 15 years or so.
The first public LyX version was when? Can't have been much longer
than 10 years
Am Thursday, 22. August 2013, 09:18:09 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 3:19 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de wrote:
by the way, in Tübingen, my home town
Cool! :)
Scott
More to Matthias Ettrich:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthias_Ettrich
Wolfgang
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
The history of LyX
http://www.lyx.org/misc/archaeology/
Pavel
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Also note that Wikipedia's LyX page [1] lists the following:
LyX 0.7.0 was released on October 24, 1995.
That's derived from in depth searching I did few years back
and put on the page posted in my previous mail.
BTW David, do you still have somewhere stored any pre
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:49 AM, David L. Johnson d...@lehigh.edu wrote:
at one time, and used Motif widgets). It was originally called LyriX,
but Matthais got a letter from a lawyer about that, so he changed the name.
According to Matthias: The idea to simply strip the name down to LyX
came
Am Thursday, 22. August 2013, 10:43:55 schrieb Liviu Andronic:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:49 AM, David L. Johnson d...@lehigh.edu
wrote:
at one time, and used Motif widgets). It was originally called
LyriX, but Matthais got a letter from a lawyer about that, so he
changed the name.
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de wrote:
I wonder how many man hours where saved in the meantime by having to write
Lyx instead of Lyrix?
What about the frustration from having to write LyX instead of Lyx,
or even worse the following monstrosity:
On 08/22/2013 03:42 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Also note that Wikipedia's LyX page [1] lists the following:
LyX 0.7.0 was released on October 24, 1995.
That's derived from in depth searching I did few years back
and put on the page posted in my previous mail.
BTW
On 08/22/2013 04:43 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:49 AM, David L. Johnsond...@lehigh.edu wrote:
at one time, and used Motif widgets). It was originally called LyriX,
but Matthais got a letter from a lawyer about that, so he changed the name.
According to Matthias: The
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 09:26:39 +0200
Wolfgang Engelmann engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de wrote:
Am Thursday, 22. August 2013, 09:18:09 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 3:19 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de wrote:
by the way, in Tübingen, my home town
Cool!
Le 22/08/13 20:42, Steve Litt of Troubleshooters.Com a écrit :
In the history of LyX, did anyone campaign for it to be a KDE app, and
if so, how was that (in my opinion mistake) prevented?
This is KLyX, a fork attempted by Matthias without telling us. But we
won in the end :)
JMarc
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 20:54:36 +0200
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote:
Le 22/08/13 20:42, Steve Litt of Troubleshooters.Com a écrit :
In the history of LyX, did anyone campaign for it to be a KDE app,
and if so, how was that (in my opinion mistake) prevented?
This is KLyX, a
On 08/22/2013 02:42 PM, Steve Litt of Troubleshooters.Com wrote:
Thursday, 22. August 2013, 09:18:09 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
I give thanks to eternity that LyX wasn't made into a KDE app. My
business has banned all use of all KDE libraries, for stability's sake.
Qt's not bad, as a matter of
On Aug 21, 2013, at 5:16 AM, Les Denham lden...@hal-pc.org wrote:
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:13:23 -0700
Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net wrote:
On Aug 18, 2013, at 6:59 PM, Les Denham lden...@hal-pc.org wrote:
My general approach to getting a LyX document into Word format is
to us the LyXHTML
On 23/08/13 10:26, Jerry wrote:
On Aug 21, 2013, at 5:16 AM, Les Denham lden...@hal-pc.org wrote:
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:13:23 -0700
Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net wrote:
On Aug 18, 2013, at 6:59 PM, Les Denham lden...@hal-pc.org wrote:
My general approach to getting a LyX document into Word
Am Wednesday, 21. August 2013, 18:53:58 schrieb stefano franchi:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Wolfgang Keller felip...@gmx.net
wrote:
And I say this as a LyX-only writer for the past 15 years or so.
The first public LyX version was when? Can't have been much longer
than 10 years
Am Thursday, 22. August 2013, 09:18:09 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 3:19 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de wrote:
by the way, in Tübingen, my home town
Cool! :)
Scott
More to Matthias Ettrich:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthias_Ettrich
Wolfgang
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
The history of LyX
http://www.lyx.org/misc/archaeology/
Pavel
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Also note that Wikipedia's LyX page [1] lists the following:
LyX 0.7.0 was released on October 24, 1995.
That's derived from in depth searching I did few years back
and put on the page posted in my previous mail.
BTW David, do you still have somewhere stored any pre
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:49 AM, David L. Johnson d...@lehigh.edu wrote:
at one time, and used Motif widgets). It was originally called LyriX,
but Matthais got a letter from a lawyer about that, so he changed the name.
According to Matthias: The idea to simply strip the name down to LyX
came
Am Thursday, 22. August 2013, 10:43:55 schrieb Liviu Andronic:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:49 AM, David L. Johnson d...@lehigh.edu
wrote:
at one time, and used Motif widgets). It was originally called
LyriX, but Matthais got a letter from a lawyer about that, so he
changed the name.
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de wrote:
I wonder how many man hours where saved in the meantime by having to write
Lyx instead of Lyrix?
What about the frustration from having to write LyX instead of Lyx,
or even worse the following monstrosity:
On 08/22/2013 03:42 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Also note that Wikipedia's LyX page [1] lists the following:
LyX 0.7.0 was released on October 24, 1995.
That's derived from in depth searching I did few years back
and put on the page posted in my previous mail.
BTW
On 08/22/2013 04:43 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:49 AM, David L. Johnsond...@lehigh.edu wrote:
at one time, and used Motif widgets). It was originally called LyriX,
but Matthais got a letter from a lawyer about that, so he changed the name.
According to Matthias: The
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 09:26:39 +0200
Wolfgang Engelmann engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de wrote:
Am Thursday, 22. August 2013, 09:18:09 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 3:19 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de wrote:
by the way, in Tübingen, my home town
Cool!
Le 22/08/13 20:42, Steve Litt of Troubleshooters.Com a écrit :
In the history of LyX, did anyone campaign for it to be a KDE app, and
if so, how was that (in my opinion mistake) prevented?
This is KLyX, a fork attempted by Matthias without telling us. But we
won in the end :)
JMarc
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 20:54:36 +0200
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote:
Le 22/08/13 20:42, Steve Litt of Troubleshooters.Com a écrit :
In the history of LyX, did anyone campaign for it to be a KDE app,
and if so, how was that (in my opinion mistake) prevented?
This is KLyX, a
On 08/22/2013 02:42 PM, Steve Litt of Troubleshooters.Com wrote:
Thursday, 22. August 2013, 09:18:09 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
I give thanks to eternity that LyX wasn't made into a KDE app. My
business has banned all use of all KDE libraries, for stability's sake.
Qt's not bad, as a matter of
On Aug 21, 2013, at 5:16 AM, Les Denham lden...@hal-pc.org wrote:
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:13:23 -0700
Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net wrote:
On Aug 18, 2013, at 6:59 PM, Les Denham lden...@hal-pc.org wrote:
My general approach to getting a LyX document into Word format is
to us the LyXHTML
On 23/08/13 10:26, Jerry wrote:
On Aug 21, 2013, at 5:16 AM, Les Denham lden...@hal-pc.org wrote:
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:13:23 -0700
Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net wrote:
On Aug 18, 2013, at 6:59 PM, Les Denham lden...@hal-pc.org wrote:
My general approach to getting a LyX document into Word
Am Wednesday, 21. August 2013, 18:53:58 schrieb stefano franchi:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Wolfgang Keller
wrote:
> > > And I say this as a LyX-only writer for the past 15 years or so.
> >
> > The first public LyX version was when? Can't have been much longer
> >
Am Thursday, 22. August 2013, 09:18:09 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 3:19 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
>
> wrote:
> > by the way, in Tübingen, my home town
>
> Cool! :)
>
> Scott
More to Matthias Ettrich:
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> The history of LyX
http://www.lyx.org/misc/archaeology/
Pavel
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Also note that Wikipedia's LyX page [1] lists the following:
> LyX 0.7.0 was released on October 24, 1995.
That's derived from in depth searching I did few years back
and put on the page posted in my previous mail.
BTW David, do you still have somewhere stored any
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:49 AM, David L. Johnson wrote:
> at one time, and used Motif widgets). It was originally called "LyriX",
> but Matthais got a letter from a lawyer about that, so he changed the name.
>
According to Matthias: "The idea to simply strip the name down to
Am Thursday, 22. August 2013, 10:43:55 schrieb Liviu Andronic:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:49 AM, David L. Johnson
wrote:
> > at one time, and used Motif widgets). It was originally called
> > "LyriX", but Matthais got a letter from a lawyer about that, so he
> > changed the
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
wrote:
> I wonder how many man hours where saved in the meantime by having to write
> Lyx instead of Lyrix?
>
What about the frustration from having to write LyX instead of Lyx,
or even worse the following
On 08/22/2013 03:42 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Also note that Wikipedia's LyX page [1] lists the following:
LyX 0.7.0 was released on October 24, 1995.
That's derived from in depth searching I did few years back
and put on the page posted in my previous mail.
BTW
On 08/22/2013 04:43 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:49 AM, David L. Johnson wrote:
at one time, and used Motif widgets). It was originally called "LyriX",
but Matthais got a letter from a lawyer about that, so he changed the name.
According to Matthias:
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 09:26:39 +0200
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> Am Thursday, 22. August 2013, 09:18:09 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 3:19 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
> >
> > wrote:
> > > by the way, in Tübingen, my home
Le 22/08/13 20:42, Steve Litt of Troubleshooters.Com a écrit :
In the history of LyX, did anyone campaign for it to be a KDE app, and
if so, how was that (in my opinion mistake) prevented?
This is KLyX, a fork attempted by Matthias without telling us. But we
won in the end :)
JMarc
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 20:54:36 +0200
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 22/08/13 20:42, Steve Litt of Troubleshooters.Com a écrit :
> > In the history of LyX, did anyone campaign for it to be a KDE app,
> > and if so, how was that (in my opinion mistake) prevented?
>
> This is
On 08/22/2013 02:42 PM, Steve Litt of Troubleshooters.Com wrote:
Thursday, 22. August 2013, 09:18:09 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
I give thanks to eternity that LyX wasn't made into a KDE app. My
business has banned all use of all KDE libraries, for stability's sake.
Qt's not bad, as a matter of
On Aug 21, 2013, at 5:16 AM, Les Denham wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:13:23 -0700
> Jerry wrote:
>
>>
>> On Aug 18, 2013, at 6:59 PM, Les Denham wrote:
>>
>>> My general approach to getting a LyX document into Word format is
On 23/08/13 10:26, Jerry wrote:
On Aug 21, 2013, at 5:16 AM, Les Denham wrote:
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:13:23 -0700
Jerry wrote:
On Aug 18, 2013, at 6:59 PM, Les Denham wrote:
My general approach to getting a LyX document into
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:13:23 -0700
Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net wrote:
On Aug 18, 2013, at 6:59 PM, Les Denham lden...@hal-pc.org wrote:
My general approach to getting a LyX document into Word format is
to us the LyXHTML export, import the exported file into
LibreOffice, fix the
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Wolfgang Keller felip...@gmx.net wrote:
Since all the typographic algorithms of TeX (linebreaking etc.) are
well-documented open-source, I always wondered why none of the more
reasonable document processors has ever implemented them. Wordperfect
could have
BTW, not to tamper enthusiasms, but the standard output of
LaTeX/TeX is not quite (yet) at the level that a professional
typesetter would produce.
Obviously, an experienced competent human being will (almost) always be
able to deliver better results than *any* algorithm.
But since I am a
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Wolfgang Keller felip...@gmx.net wrote:
And I say this as a LyX-only writer for the past 15 years or so.
The first public LyX version was when? Can't have been much longer
than 10 years ago.
Way earlier than that. I switched to Lyx after I completed my
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 6:53 PM, stefano franchi
stefano.fran...@gmail.com wrote:
And I say this as a LyX-only writer for the past 15 years or so.
The first public LyX version was when? Can't have been much longer
than 10 years ago.
Way earlier than that. I switched to Lyx after I completed
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 6:53 PM, stefano franchi
stefano.fran...@gmail.com wrote:
And I say this as a LyX-only writer for the past 15 years or so.
The first public LyX version was when? Can't have been much
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:53 AM, stefano franchi stefano.fran...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Wolfgang Keller felip...@gmx.netwrote:
And I say this as a LyX-only writer for the past 15 years or so.
The first public LyX version was when? Can't have been much longer
Original Message
Subject:Re: Question: Using LyX as your daily word processor
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:22:19 -0400
From: David L. Johnson david.john...@lehigh.edu
To: Wolfgang Keller felip...@gmx.net
On 08/21/2013 11:45 AM, Wolfgang Keller wrote:
And I
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:49 PM, David L. Johnson d...@lehigh.edu wrote:
Original Message Subject: Re: Question: Using LyX as
your daily word processor Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:22:19 -0400 From: David
L. Johnson david.john...@lehigh.edu david.john...@lehigh.edu
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:13:23 -0700
Jerry lancebo...@qwest.net wrote:
On Aug 18, 2013, at 6:59 PM, Les Denham lden...@hal-pc.org wrote:
My general approach to getting a LyX document into Word format is
to us the LyXHTML export, import the exported file into
LibreOffice, fix the
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Wolfgang Keller felip...@gmx.net wrote:
Since all the typographic algorithms of TeX (linebreaking etc.) are
well-documented open-source, I always wondered why none of the more
reasonable document processors has ever implemented them. Wordperfect
could have
BTW, not to tamper enthusiasms, but the standard output of
LaTeX/TeX is not quite (yet) at the level that a professional
typesetter would produce.
Obviously, an experienced competent human being will (almost) always be
able to deliver better results than *any* algorithm.
But since I am a
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Wolfgang Keller felip...@gmx.net wrote:
And I say this as a LyX-only writer for the past 15 years or so.
The first public LyX version was when? Can't have been much longer
than 10 years ago.
Way earlier than that. I switched to Lyx after I completed my
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 6:53 PM, stefano franchi
stefano.fran...@gmail.com wrote:
And I say this as a LyX-only writer for the past 15 years or so.
The first public LyX version was when? Can't have been much longer
than 10 years ago.
Way earlier than that. I switched to Lyx after I completed
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 6:53 PM, stefano franchi
stefano.fran...@gmail.com wrote:
And I say this as a LyX-only writer for the past 15 years or so.
The first public LyX version was when? Can't have been much
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:53 AM, stefano franchi stefano.fran...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Wolfgang Keller felip...@gmx.netwrote:
And I say this as a LyX-only writer for the past 15 years or so.
The first public LyX version was when? Can't have been much longer
Original Message
Subject:Re: Question: Using LyX as your daily word processor
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:22:19 -0400
From: David L. Johnson david.john...@lehigh.edu
To: Wolfgang Keller felip...@gmx.net
On 08/21/2013 11:45 AM, Wolfgang Keller wrote:
And I
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:49 PM, David L. Johnson d...@lehigh.edu wrote:
Original Message Subject: Re: Question: Using LyX as
your daily word processor Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:22:19 -0400 From: David
L. Johnson david.john...@lehigh.edu david.john...@lehigh.edu
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:13:23 -0700
Jerry wrote:
>
> On Aug 18, 2013, at 6:59 PM, Les Denham wrote:
>
> > My general approach to getting a LyX document into Word format is
> > to us the LyXHTML export, import the exported file into
> > LibreOffice,
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Wolfgang Keller wrote:
>
> Since all the typographic algorithms of TeX (linebreaking etc.) are
> well-documented open-source, I always wondered why none of the more
> reasonable document processors has ever implemented them. Wordperfect
> could
> BTW, not to tamper enthusiasms, but the "standard" output of
> LaTeX/TeX is not quite (yet) at the level that a professional
> typesetter would produce.
Obviously, an experienced competent human being will (almost) always be
able to deliver better results than *any* algorithm.
But since I am a
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Wolfgang Keller wrote:
>
> > And I say this as a LyX-only writer for the past 15 years or so.
>
> The first public LyX version was when? Can't have been much longer
> than 10 years ago.
Way earlier than that. I switched to Lyx after I
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 6:53 PM, stefano franchi
wrote:
>> > And I say this as a LyX-only writer for the past 15 years or so.
>>
>> The first public LyX version was when? Can't have been much longer
>> than 10 years ago.
>
> Way earlier than that. I switched to Lyx
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 6:53 PM, stefano franchi
> wrote:
> >> > And I say this as a LyX-only writer for the past 15 years or so.
> >>
> >> The first public LyX version was when? Can't
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:53 AM, stefano franchi wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Wolfgang Keller wrote:
>
>>
>> > And I say this as a LyX-only writer for the past 15 years or so.
>>
>> The first public LyX version was when? Can't have
Original Message
Subject:Re: Question: Using LyX as your daily word processor
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:22:19 -0400
From: David L. Johnson <david.john...@lehigh.edu>
To: Wolfgang Keller <felip...@gmx.net>
On 08/21/2013 11:45 AM, Wolfgang
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:49 PM, David L. Johnson <d...@lehigh.edu> wrote:
>
> Original Message ---- Subject: Re: Question: Using LyX as
> your daily word processor Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:22:19 -0400 From: David
> L. Johnson <david.john...@lehigh.edu> &
I forgot to mention one minus, btw:
Compared to XML, with LyX/LaTeX you can't *enforce* compliance of
documents with a given structure, like with XML schemas and validating
editors. That can be a nuisance in an environment with several authors.
I literally cannot use Word or its clones for
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Wolfgang Keller felip...@gmx.net wrote:
For beamer I still prefer Texworks. The last time I tried, I couldn't
get the overlays to work *exactly* the way I wanted them with LyX, this
is one thing that's just much easier with a source-level editor.
I do use LyX
The only case where I still prefer to use LO over LyX is
generation of documents from databases.
That I do with LaTeX and Perl (such as pulling out VAT out of my
accounting package SQL-Ledger and printing it onto the scanned
form :-)-O
That's exactly why I prefer to use LO for such
On Aug 18, 2013, at 6:59 PM, Les Denham lden...@hal-pc.org wrote:
My general approach to getting a LyX document into Word format is to
us the LyXHTML export, import the exported file into LibreOffice, fix
the inevitable problems, and save in DOCX format.
How do you import the XHTML from
I forgot to mention one minus, btw:
Compared to XML, with LyX/LaTeX you can't *enforce* compliance of
documents with a given structure, like with XML schemas and validating
editors. That can be a nuisance in an environment with several authors.
I literally cannot use Word or its clones for
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Wolfgang Keller felip...@gmx.net wrote:
For beamer I still prefer Texworks. The last time I tried, I couldn't
get the overlays to work *exactly* the way I wanted them with LyX, this
is one thing that's just much easier with a source-level editor.
I do use LyX
The only case where I still prefer to use LO over LyX is
generation of documents from databases.
That I do with LaTeX and Perl (such as pulling out VAT out of my
accounting package SQL-Ledger and printing it onto the scanned
form :-)-O
That's exactly why I prefer to use LO for such
On Aug 18, 2013, at 6:59 PM, Les Denham lden...@hal-pc.org wrote:
My general approach to getting a LyX document into Word format is to
us the LyXHTML export, import the exported file into LibreOffice, fix
the inevitable problems, and save in DOCX format.
How do you import the XHTML from
I forgot to mention one "minus", btw:
Compared to XML, with LyX/LaTeX you can't *enforce* compliance of
documents with a given structure, like with XML schemas and validating
editors. That can be a nuisance in an environment with several authors.
> I literally cannot use Word or its clones for
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Wolfgang Keller wrote:
> For beamer I still prefer Texworks. The last time I tried, I couldn't
> get the overlays to work *exactly* the way I wanted them with LyX, this
> is one thing that's just much easier with a source-level editor.
>
> I do
201 - 300 of 1387 matches
Mail list logo