Re: refstyle and amsmath

2024-02-02 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Freitag, dem 02.02.2024 um 11:14 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: > Should we add a note to the RELEASE-NOTES about needing an up to date > refstyle when used with AMS? This problem is not specific to 2.4, so I don't know. -- Jürgen -- lyx-users mailing list lyx-users@lists.lyx.org

Re: refstyle and amsmath

2024-02-02 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 2/2/24 10:30, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Freitag, dem 02.02.2024 um 16:25 +0100 schrieb Kees Zeelenberg: He has, and refstyle now works OK, also in more complicated documents, with export both to Pdf-pdflatex and to Pdf-luatex, and also with the autonum package. Thanks for reporting back.

Re: refstyle and amsmath

2024-02-02 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Freitag, dem 02.02.2024 um 16:25 +0100 schrieb Kees Zeelenberg: > He has, and refstyle now works OK, also in more complicated > documents, with export both to Pdf-pdflatex and to Pdf-luatex, and > also with the autonum package. Thanks for reporting back. -- Jürgen -- lyx-users mailing list

RE: refstyle and amsmath

2024-02-02 Thread Kees Zeelenberg
Van: lyx-users Namens Jürgen Spitzmüller Verzonden: donderdag 1 februari 2024 10:22 Am Do., 1. Feb. 2024 um 08:20 Uhr schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : FYI version 0.6. of refstyle, now on CTAN and soon distributed via the package managers, will contain the fix of this issue. The new version

Re: refstyle and amsmath

2024-02-01 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Do., 1. Feb. 2024 um 08:20 Uhr schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller < jspi...@gmail.com>: > FYI version 0.6. of refstyle, now on CTAN and soon distributed via the > package managers, will contain the fix of this issue. > The new version still does not completely work. I have reported it. Here is the

Re: refstyle and amsmath

2024-01-31 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Mittwoch, dem 31.01.2024 um 08:34 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: > Am Dienstag, dem 30.01.2024 um 22:26 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly > Heck: > > Maybe if he knew this was causing specific problems for us, he'd go > > ahead and fix it. > > He just responded that he intends to do it already

Re: refstyle and amsmath

2024-01-30 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Dienstag, dem 30.01.2024 um 22:26 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: > Maybe if he knew this was causing specific problems for us, he'd go > ahead and fix it. He just responded that he intends to do it already today. -- Jürgen -- lyx-users mailing list lyx-users@lists.lyx.org

Re: refstyle and amsmath

2024-01-30 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Mittwoch, dem 31.01.2024 um 07:05 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: > Am Dienstag, dem 30.01.2024 um 22:26 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly > Heck: > > > I would just ping him, most likely he just got busy with other > > > stuff. > > > > I'd be happy to write him, if someone has an email

Re: refstyle and amsmath

2024-01-30 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Dienstag, dem 30.01.2024 um 22:26 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: > > I would just ping him, most likely he just got busy with other > > stuff. > > I'd be happy to write him, if someone has an email address. Maybe if > he knew this was causing specific problems for us, he'd go ahead and >

Re: refstyle and amsmath

2024-01-30 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 1/30/24 15:10, Pavel Sanda wrote: On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 06:42:23PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Dienstag, dem 30.01.2024 um 18:17 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: I reported this to the maintainer in March 2023 and even sent a patch [2] but never got a response. I have to

Re: refstyle and amsmath

2024-01-30 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 06:42:23PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Dienstag, dem 30.01.2024 um 18:17 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: > > I reported this to the maintainer in March 2023 and even sent a patch > > [2] but never got a response. > > I have to correct myself. Danie responded

Re: refstyle and amsmath

2024-01-30 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Dienstag, dem 30.01.2024 um 12:30 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: > I guess we need to do something like that for 2.4? I can have a look tomorrow. -- Jürgen -- lyx-users mailing list lyx-users@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users

Re: refstyle and amsmath

2024-01-30 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Dienstag, dem 30.01.2024 um 18:17 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: > I reported this to the maintainer in March 2023 and even sent a patch > [2] but never got a response. I have to correct myself. Danie responded that he will have a look. So it is possible that this will be fixed in refstyle

Re: refstyle and amsmath

2024-01-30 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 1/30/24 12:17, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Montag, dem 29.01.2024 um 15:00 +0100 schrieb Kees Zeelenberg: Some time ago there was a discussion on the list about refstyle in combination with amsmath, leading to error messages from refstyle. It appears refstyle is now loaded after amsmath,

Re: refstyle and amsmath

2024-01-30 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Montag, dem 29.01.2024 um 15:00 +0100 schrieb Kees Zeelenberg: > Some time ago there was a discussion on the list about refstyle in > combination with amsmath, leading to error messages from refstyle. It > appears refstyle is now loaded after amsmath, but this now leads to > messages like