Le Tue, 4 Mar 2003 18:53:13 -0500
Matej Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait :
Hello,
Thomas Schönhoff wrote:
I really stunned to note that LyX tries to override
(/usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmex10.pfb) a file which is
actually installed by tetex-extra 1.0.2+20011202
Nicolas Boos wrote:
My package isn't a backport of the official. Is written from
scratch (in fact based on the old official).
I'm planning to split my package like this :
- lyx-common (arch-indep stuff)
- lyx-qt
- lyx-xforms
There is something strange with the maintaining of
Matej == Matej Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Matej Nicolas Boos wrote:
My package isn't a backport of the official. Is written from
scratch (in fact based on the old official).
I'm planning to split my package like this :
- lyx-common (arch-indep stuff) - lyx-qt - lyx-xforms
Matej
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Matej There is something strange with the maintaining of the LyX on
Matej Debian. There are really strange release critical bugs on
These bugs are strange indeed. And since they are from version
1.1.6fix4, there is not much we can do about them anyway. At least
Matej == Matej Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Matej My point was more about the unhappy state of maintenance on
Matej Debian. However, the issue may lay more in the fact, that there
Matej are bigger problems with Debian going around
Matej (http://www.debianplanet.org/node.php?id=915), we should
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Hmm, debian seems like a strange distant world to me when I read this.
Actually, I am not sure I understand what this article is about :)
People on debian-legal decided, that documentation from FSF for
glibc is not free (?!) and therefore whole process of migrating
Le Tue, 4 Mar 2003 18:53:13 -0500
Matej Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait :
Hello,
Thomas Schönhoff wrote:
I really stunned to note that LyX tries to override
(/usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmex10.pfb) a file which is
actually installed by tetex-extra 1.0.2+20011202
Nicolas Boos wrote:
My package isn't a backport of the official. Is written from
scratch (in fact based on the old official).
I'm planning to split my package like this :
- lyx-common (arch-indep stuff)
- lyx-qt
- lyx-xforms
There is something strange with the maintaining of
Matej == Matej Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Matej Nicolas Boos wrote:
My package isn't a backport of the official. Is written from
scratch (in fact based on the old official).
I'm planning to split my package like this :
- lyx-common (arch-indep stuff) - lyx-qt - lyx-xforms
Matej
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Matej There is something strange with the maintaining of the LyX on
Matej Debian. There are really strange release critical bugs on
These bugs are strange indeed. And since they are from version
1.1.6fix4, there is not much we can do about them anyway. At least
Matej == Matej Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Matej My point was more about the unhappy state of maintenance on
Matej Debian. However, the issue may lay more in the fact, that there
Matej are bigger problems with Debian going around
Matej (http://www.debianplanet.org/node.php?id=915), we should
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Hmm, debian seems like a strange distant world to me when I read this.
Actually, I am not sure I understand what this article is about :)
People on debian-legal decided, that documentation from FSF for
glibc is not free (?!) and therefore whole process of migrating
Le Tue, 4 Mar 2003 18:53:13 -0500
Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait :
Hello,
> Thomas Schönhoff wrote:
> > I really stunned to note that LyX tries to override
> > (/usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmex10.pfb) a file which is
> > actually installed by tetex-extra 1.0.2+20011202
Nicolas Boos wrote:
> My package isn't a backport of the official. Is written from
> "scratch" (in fact based on the old official).
>
> I'm planning to split my package like this :
>
>- lyx-common (arch-indep stuff)
>- lyx-qt
>- lyx-xforms
There is something strange with the
> "Matej" == Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matej> Nicolas Boos wrote:
>> My package isn't a backport of the official. Is written from
>> "scratch" (in fact based on the old official).
>>
>> I'm planning to split my package like this :
>>
>> - lyx-common (arch-indep stuff) - lyx-qt
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Matej> There is something strange with the maintaining of the LyX on
> Matej> Debian. There are really strange release critical bugs on
>
> These bugs are strange indeed. And since they are from version
> 1.1.6fix4, there is not much we can do about them anyway. At
> "Matej" == Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matej> My point was more about the unhappy state of maintenance on
Matej> Debian. However, the issue may lay more in the fact, that there
Matej> are bigger problems with Debian going around
Matej>
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Hmm, debian seems like a strange distant world to me when I read this.
> Actually, I am not sure I understand what this article is about :)
People on debian-legal decided, that documentation from FSF for
glibc is not free (?!) and therefore whole process of migrating
Hello,
after switching from xforms to LyX-qt-1.3.0 I had some troubles to get
running my spellchecker! Following the advice of Juergen I retrieved new
GNU-Aspell and the German dictionary (aspell-de) packages. After
building debs (for Woody) I installed these by using checkinstall.
Hello,
now things go on rapidly into dullness!
I've compiled LyX-1.3.0 ./configure --with-qt --with-pspell on my
Woody box!
Whole process ended up making a deb file by using checkinstall, when
trying to install this deb I get this error message:
env LC_ALL=C dpkg -i lyx_1.3.0-1_i386.deb
Thomas Schönhoff wrote:
I really stunned to note that LyX tries to override
(/usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmex10.pfb) a file which is
actually installed by tetex-extra 1.0.2+20011202 installation!
It is a bug, but not in the lyx, but in the Debian package. Which
is strange,
Hello,
after switching from xforms to LyX-qt-1.3.0 I had some troubles to get
running my spellchecker! Following the advice of Juergen I retrieved new
GNU-Aspell and the German dictionary (aspell-de) packages. After
building debs (for Woody) I installed these by using checkinstall.
Hello,
now things go on rapidly into dullness!
I've compiled LyX-1.3.0 ./configure --with-qt --with-pspell on my
Woody box!
Whole process ended up making a deb file by using checkinstall, when
trying to install this deb I get this error message:
env LC_ALL=C dpkg -i lyx_1.3.0-1_i386.deb
Thomas Schönhoff wrote:
I really stunned to note that LyX tries to override
(/usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmex10.pfb) a file which is
actually installed by tetex-extra 1.0.2+20011202 installation!
It is a bug, but not in the lyx, but in the Debian package. Which
is strange,
Hello,
after switching from xforms to LyX-qt-1.3.0 I had some troubles to get
running my spellchecker! Following the advice of Juergen I retrieved new
GNU-Aspell and the German dictionary (aspell-de) packages. After
building debs (for Woody) I installed these by using checkinstall.
Hello,
now things go on rapidly into dullness!
I've compiled LyX-1.3.0 "./configure --with-qt --with-pspell on my
Woody box!
Whole process ended up making a deb file by using checkinstall, when
trying to install this deb I get this error message:
env LC_ALL=C dpkg -i lyx_1.3.0-1_i386.deb
Thomas Schönhoff wrote:
> I really stunned to note that LyX tries to override
> (/usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmex10.pfb) a file which is
> actually installed by tetex-extra 1.0.2+20011202 installation!
It is a bug, but not in the lyx, but in the Debian package. Which
is strange,
27 matches
Mail list logo
