On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Matej Cepl wrote:
That's true -- but I believe that one should send only PDFs
anyway.
In LyX, Export - PDF looks lousy on screen (though prints ok), unless
pslatex fonts are used (even then math/symbol fonts looks pixelised).
Export - Postscript looks nice.
I'm with you
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 12:34:33AM +1100, Steven Homolya wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Matej Cepl wrote:
That's true -- but I believe that one should send only PDFs
anyway.
In LyX, Export - PDF looks lousy on screen (though prints ok), unless
pslatex fonts are used (even then math/symbol
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Dekel Tsur wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 12:34:33AM +1100, Steven Homolya wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Matej Cepl wrote:
That's true -- but I believe that one should send only PDFs
anyway.
In LyX, Export - PDF looks lousy on screen (though prints ok), unless
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 01:48:49AM +1100, Steven Homolya wrote:
The second suggestion: putting
\usepackage{ae,aecompl}
did work! PDF looks good!
The Extended.lyx document is outdated.
You should just need to select ae font in the document dialog.
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Ingo Kappler wrote:
Maybe LyX should put \usepackage{ae,aecompl} in the preamble by default
(at least when exporting to pdf).
I write in german and if I use ae there will be no umlauts anymore. So
default wouldn't be that easy.
Works for me. All these characters
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Dekel Tsur wrote:
The second suggestion: putting
\usepackage{ae,aecompl}
did work! PDF looks good!
The Extended.lyx document is outdated.
You should just need to select ae font in the document dialog.
Yes, that works too (with umlauts, accents and more). Thank
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Matej Cepl wrote:
That's true -- but I believe that one should send only PDFs
anyway.
In LyX, Export - PDF looks lousy on screen (though prints ok), unless
pslatex fonts are used (even then math/symbol fonts looks pixelised).
Export - Postscript looks nice.
I'm with you
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 12:34:33AM +1100, Steven Homolya wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Matej Cepl wrote:
That's true -- but I believe that one should send only PDFs
anyway.
In LyX, Export - PDF looks lousy on screen (though prints ok), unless
pslatex fonts are used (even then math/symbol
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Dekel Tsur wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 12:34:33AM +1100, Steven Homolya wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Matej Cepl wrote:
That's true -- but I believe that one should send only PDFs
anyway.
In LyX, Export - PDF looks lousy on screen (though prints ok), unless
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 01:48:49AM +1100, Steven Homolya wrote:
The second suggestion: putting
\usepackage{ae,aecompl}
did work! PDF looks good!
The Extended.lyx document is outdated.
You should just need to select ae font in the document dialog.
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Ingo Kappler wrote:
Maybe LyX should put \usepackage{ae,aecompl} in the preamble by default
(at least when exporting to pdf).
I write in german and if I use ae there will be no umlauts anymore. So
default wouldn't be that easy.
Works for me. All these characters
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Dekel Tsur wrote:
The second suggestion: putting
\usepackage{ae,aecompl}
did work! PDF looks good!
The Extended.lyx document is outdated.
You should just need to select ae font in the document dialog.
Yes, that works too (with umlauts, accents and more). Thank
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Matej Cepl wrote:
> That's true -- but I believe that one should send only PDFs
> anyway.
In LyX, Export -> PDF looks lousy on screen (though prints ok), unless
pslatex fonts are used (even then math/symbol fonts looks pixelised).
Export -> Postscript looks nice.
I'm with
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 12:34:33AM +1100, Steven Homolya wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Matej Cepl wrote:
>
> > That's true -- but I believe that one should send only PDFs
> > anyway.
>
> In LyX, Export -> PDF looks lousy on screen (though prints ok), unless
> pslatex fonts are used (even then
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 12:34:33AM +1100, Steven Homolya wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Matej Cepl wrote:
> >
> > > That's true -- but I believe that one should send only PDFs
> > > anyway.
> >
> > In LyX, Export -> PDF looks lousy on screen (though
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 01:48:49AM +1100, Steven Homolya wrote:
>
> The second suggestion: putting
> \usepackage{ae,aecompl}
> did work! PDF looks good!
The Extended.lyx document is outdated.
You should just need to select "ae" font in the document dialog.
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Ingo Kappler wrote:
> >Maybe LyX should put \usepackage{ae,aecompl} in the preamble by default
> >(at least when exporting to pdf).
>
> I write in german and if I use ae there will be no umlauts anymore. So
> default wouldn't be that easy.
>
Works for me. All these
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > The second suggestion: putting
> > \usepackage{ae,aecompl}
> > did work! PDF looks good!
>
> The Extended.lyx document is outdated.
> You should just need to select "ae" font in the document dialog.
Yes, that works too (with umlauts, accents and
Oscar == =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Oscar L=F3pez?= ISO-8859-15 writes:
Oscar Hello lyxers I have recently upgraded to lyx-1.2.3 from lyx
Oscar -1.1.6fix4 and I am experiencing some problems with the
Oscar inclusion of graphic files. I am trying to include the output
Oscar of metapost files, let's say
Oscar López wrote:
In the past I experienced a lot of problems because using
ps2pdf introduced type 3 bitmaps fonts in the graphics with
math fonts. I asked for help in several lists and documents and
at the end I followed the metapost approach. For sure things
could be better now, so I'll
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 07:40:15AM +0100, Oscar L?pez wrote:
I meant a more automatic solution. The problem
is I produce metapost files from several applications, mainly xfig,
gnuplot, and metagraf. Most of the times it is not possible to control
that they produce the metapost files with the
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 10:11:41AM -0500, Matej Cepl wrote:
Oscar L?pez wrote:
http://www.iit.upco.es/~oscar/download/foo.ps
to see what I mean. The first figure is generated using
prologues:=1; and the second one doesn't have the prologues:=1;
In the first figure the \lambda is
Dekel Tsur wrote:
A problem with this method is that you cannot send the Postscript file
to other people (though you can convert it to PDF with ps2pdf).
That's true -- but I believe that one should send only PDFs
anyway.
Matej
--
Matej Cepl,
Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25
Oscar == =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Oscar L=F3pez?= ISO-8859-15 writes:
Oscar Hello lyxers I have recently upgraded to lyx-1.2.3 from lyx
Oscar -1.1.6fix4 and I am experiencing some problems with the
Oscar inclusion of graphic files. I am trying to include the output
Oscar of metapost files, let's say
Oscar López wrote:
In the past I experienced a lot of problems because using
ps2pdf introduced type 3 bitmaps fonts in the graphics with
math fonts. I asked for help in several lists and documents and
at the end I followed the metapost approach. For sure things
could be better now, so I'll
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 07:40:15AM +0100, Oscar L?pez wrote:
I meant a more automatic solution. The problem
is I produce metapost files from several applications, mainly xfig,
gnuplot, and metagraf. Most of the times it is not possible to control
that they produce the metapost files with the
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 10:11:41AM -0500, Matej Cepl wrote:
Oscar L?pez wrote:
http://www.iit.upco.es/~oscar/download/foo.ps
to see what I mean. The first figure is generated using
prologues:=1; and the second one doesn't have the prologues:=1;
In the first figure the \lambda is
Dekel Tsur wrote:
A problem with this method is that you cannot send the Postscript file
to other people (though you can convert it to PDF with ps2pdf).
That's true -- but I believe that one should send only PDFs
anyway.
Matej
--
Matej Cepl,
Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25
> "Oscar" == =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Oscar L=F3pez?= writes:
Oscar> Hello lyxers I have recently upgraded to lyx-1.2.3 from lyx
Oscar> -1.1.6fix4 and I am experiencing some problems with the
Oscar> inclusion of graphic files. I am trying to include the output
Oscar> of metapost files, let's say
Oscar López wrote:
> In the past I experienced a lot of problems because using
> ps2pdf introduced type 3 bitmaps fonts in the graphics with
> math fonts. I asked for help in several lists and documents and
> at the end I followed the metapost approach. For sure things
> could be better now, so
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 07:40:15AM +0100, Oscar L?pez wrote:
>
> I meant a more automatic solution. The problem
> is I produce metapost files from several applications, mainly xfig,
> gnuplot, and metagraf. Most of the times it is not possible to control
> that they produce the metapost files
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 10:11:41AM -0500, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Oscar L?pez wrote:
> > http://www.iit.upco.es/~oscar/download/foo.ps
> >
> > to see what I mean. The first figure is generated using
> > prologues:=1; and the second one doesn't have the prologues:=1;
> > In the first figure the
Dekel Tsur wrote:
> A problem with this method is that you cannot send the Postscript file
> to other people (though you can convert it to PDF with ps2pdf).
That's true -- but I believe that one should send only PDFs
anyway.
Matej
--
Matej Cepl,
Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25
Oscar López wrote:
I meant that in order to produce a more automatic solution. The
problem is I produce metapost files from several applications,
mainly xfig, gnuplot, and metagraf. Most of the times it is not
Why do you go through MetaPost then? Both xfig and gnuplot can
produce excellent EPS
Matej Cepl wrote:
Oscar López wrote:
I meant that in order to produce a more automatic solution. The
problem is I produce metapost files from several applications,
mainly xfig, gnuplot, and metagraf. Most of the times it is not
Why do you go through MetaPost then? Both xfig and gnuplot can
Oscar López wrote:
They are, but I have no idea, why they are there. Could you
please send me a Metpost-produced EPS file (using prologues :=
1)?
Attached the eps produced using prologues:=1;
EPS files seems OK to me -- no paths included. Weird...
Matej
--
Matej Cepl,
Finger: 89EF 4BC6
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, [ISO-8859-1] Oscar López wrote:
* How do you show incrementally a graphic during a presentation? Afaik
only using ppower and multiinclude metapost files as layers. Please
check this presentation
http://www.iit.upco.es/~oscar/download/er_eolica_p4.pdf
OK, I have to
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 06:32:09PM +0100, Oscar L?pez wrote:
Why do you go through MetaPost then? Both xfig and gnuplot can
produce excellent EPS files. As for lambda and similar things,
there are some drivers based on LaTeX picture environment.
Two reasons mainly:
* How do you insert
Dekel Tsur wrote:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 06:32:09PM +0100, Oscar L?pez wrote:
postscript and pdf outputs from the same latex file, afaik there no
exist an efficient pdffrag or something like that.
Why do you need that ? You can use ps2pdf.
In the past I experienced a lot of problems
Oscar López wrote:
I meant that in order to produce a more automatic solution. The
problem is I produce metapost files from several applications,
mainly xfig, gnuplot, and metagraf. Most of the times it is not
Why do you go through MetaPost then? Both xfig and gnuplot can
produce excellent EPS
Matej Cepl wrote:
Oscar López wrote:
I meant that in order to produce a more automatic solution. The
problem is I produce metapost files from several applications,
mainly xfig, gnuplot, and metagraf. Most of the times it is not
Why do you go through MetaPost then? Both xfig and gnuplot can
Oscar López wrote:
They are, but I have no idea, why they are there. Could you
please send me a Metpost-produced EPS file (using prologues :=
1)?
Attached the eps produced using prologues:=1;
EPS files seems OK to me -- no paths included. Weird...
Matej
--
Matej Cepl,
Finger: 89EF 4BC6
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, [ISO-8859-1] Oscar López wrote:
* How do you show incrementally a graphic during a presentation? Afaik
only using ppower and multiinclude metapost files as layers. Please
check this presentation
http://www.iit.upco.es/~oscar/download/er_eolica_p4.pdf
OK, I have to
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 06:32:09PM +0100, Oscar L?pez wrote:
Why do you go through MetaPost then? Both xfig and gnuplot can
produce excellent EPS files. As for lambda and similar things,
there are some drivers based on LaTeX picture environment.
Two reasons mainly:
* How do you insert
Dekel Tsur wrote:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 06:32:09PM +0100, Oscar L?pez wrote:
postscript and pdf outputs from the same latex file, afaik there no
exist an efficient pdffrag or something like that.
Why do you need that ? You can use ps2pdf.
In the past I experienced a lot of problems
Oscar López wrote:
> I meant that in order to produce a more automatic solution. The
> problem is I produce metapost files from several applications,
> mainly xfig, gnuplot, and metagraf. Most of the times it is not
Why do you go through MetaPost then? Both xfig and gnuplot can
produce excellent
Matej Cepl wrote:
Oscar López wrote:
I meant that in order to produce a more automatic solution. The
problem is I produce metapost files from several applications,
mainly xfig, gnuplot, and metagraf. Most of the times it is not
Why do you go through MetaPost then? Both xfig and gnuplot can
Oscar López wrote:
> >They are, but I have no idea, why they are there. Could you
> >please send me a Metpost-produced EPS file (using prologues :=
> >1)?
>
> Attached the eps produced using prologues:=1;
EPS files seems OK to me -- no paths included. Weird...
Matej
--
Matej Cepl,
Finger:
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, [ISO-8859-1] Oscar López wrote:
> * How do you show incrementally a graphic during a presentation? Afaik
> only using ppower and multiinclude metapost files as layers. Please
> check this presentation
>
> http://www.iit.upco.es/~oscar/download/er_eolica_p4.pdf
OK, I have
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 06:32:09PM +0100, Oscar L?pez wrote:
> >Why do you go through MetaPost then? Both xfig and gnuplot can
> >produce excellent EPS files. As for lambda and similar things,
> >there are some drivers based on LaTeX picture environment.
>
> Two reasons mainly:
>
> * How do you
Dekel Tsur wrote:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 06:32:09PM +0100, Oscar L?pez wrote:
postscript and pdf outputs from the same latex file, afaik there no
exist an efficient pdffrag or something like that.
Why do you need that ? You can use ps2pdf.
In the past I experienced a lot of problems
Oscar López wrote:
1. The definition of GS_LIB does not conflict with the default
GS_LIB just in the case that it existe before?
If it did (check with set | less), than you should add new path
to the old one (find, where the old variable is set and then add
it there using colon as a delimiter).
Matej Cepl wrote:
3 Several messages complaingin of dvips are:
This is dvips(k) 5.86e Copyright 2001 Radical Eye Software
(www.radicaleye.com) ' TeX output 2003.01.21:1843' - foo.ps
dvips: Font cmr10 used in file /home/oscar/tmp/mp/fnflm_p.0 is
not in the mapping file. dvips: Font cmmi10 used
Oscar López wrote:
1. The definition of GS_LIB does not conflict with the default
GS_LIB just in the case that it existe before?
If it did (check with set | less), than you should add new path
to the old one (find, where the old variable is set and then add
it there using colon as a delimiter).
Matej Cepl wrote:
3 Several messages complaingin of dvips are:
This is dvips(k) 5.86e Copyright 2001 Radical Eye Software
(www.radicaleye.com) ' TeX output 2003.01.21:1843' - foo.ps
dvips: Font cmr10 used in file /home/oscar/tmp/mp/fnflm_p.0 is
not in the mapping file. dvips: Font cmmi10 used
Oscar López wrote:
> 1. The definition of GS_LIB does not conflict with the default
> GS_LIB just in the case that it existe before?
If it did (check with set | less), than you should add new path
to the old one (find, where the old variable is set and then add
it there using colon as a
Matej Cepl wrote:
3 Several messages complaingin of dvips are:
This is dvips(k) 5.86e Copyright 2001 Radical Eye Software
(www.radicaleye.com) ' TeX output 2003.01.21:1843' -> foo.ps
dvips: Font cmr10 used in file /home/oscar/tmp/mp/fnflm_p.0 is
not in the mapping file. dvips: Font cmmi10 used
Matej Cepl wrote:
Oscar López wrote:
This foo.# is an almost eps file. In fact if someone tries to view
this eps using gv an error is triggered. Only latex when this file
is included using \includegraphics knows how to proceed
You can make it into an adult EPS file by adding command
Oscar López wrote:
http://www.iit.upco.es/~oscar/download/foo.ps
to see what I mean. The first figure is generated using
prologues:=1; and the second one doesn't have the prologues:=1;
In the first figure the \lambda is missing in the ylabel and
the text of labels are text fonts. However in
Matej Cepl wrote:
Well, \lambda is OK on my computer, because I have configured
properly GhostScript (see pdf file on
http://www.volny.cz/cepls/ps-pdf/foo.pdf). Unpack the attached
tarball (of course, I assume that you are with real operating
system which supports links not M$ crap), and then set
Matej Cepl wrote:
Oscar López wrote:
This foo.# is an almost eps file. In fact if someone tries to view
this eps using gv an error is triggered. Only latex when this file
is included using \includegraphics knows how to proceed
You can make it into an adult EPS file by adding command
Oscar López wrote:
http://www.iit.upco.es/~oscar/download/foo.ps
to see what I mean. The first figure is generated using
prologues:=1; and the second one doesn't have the prologues:=1;
In the first figure the \lambda is missing in the ylabel and
the text of labels are text fonts. However in
Matej Cepl wrote:
Well, \lambda is OK on my computer, because I have configured
properly GhostScript (see pdf file on
http://www.volny.cz/cepls/ps-pdf/foo.pdf). Unpack the attached
tarball (of course, I assume that you are with real operating
system which supports links not M$ crap), and then set
Matej Cepl wrote:
Oscar López wrote:
This foo.# is an almost eps file. In fact if someone tries to view
this eps using gv an error is triggered. Only latex when this file
is included using \includegraphics knows how to proceed
You can make it into an adult EPS file by adding command
Oscar López wrote:
> http://www.iit.upco.es/~oscar/download/foo.ps
>
> to see what I mean. The first figure is generated using
> prologues:=1; and the second one doesn't have the prologues:=1;
> In the first figure the \lambda is missing in the ylabel and
> the text of labels are text fonts.
Matej Cepl wrote:
Well, \lambda is OK on my computer, because I have configured
properly GhostScript (see pdf file on
http://www.volny.cz/cepls/ps-pdf/foo.pdf). Unpack the attached
tarball (of course, I assume that you are with real operating
system which supports links not M$ crap), and then set
Hello lyxers
I have recently upgraded to lyx-1.2.3 from lyx -1.1.6fix4 and I am
experiencing some problems with the inclusion of graphic files. I am
trying to include the output of metapost files, let's say fnflm.0 and
when I try to view the postscript lyx says that:
No information for
Oscar López wrote:
No information for converting from 0 to eps
Does adding 0 to Edit/Preferences/Converters/File Format/EPS
help?
Matej
--
Matej Cepl,
Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC
138 Highland Ave. #10, Somerville, Ma 02143, (617) 623-1488
Opinions founded on
Oscar == =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Oscar L=F3pez?= ISO-8859-15 writes:
Oscar Hello lyxers I have recently upgraded to lyx-1.2.3 from lyx
Oscar -1.1.6fix4 and I am experiencing some problems with the
Oscar inclusion of graphic files. I am trying to include the output
Oscar of metapost files, let's say
Matej Cepl wrote:
Oscar López wrote:
No information for converting from 0 to eps
Does adding 0 to Edit/Preferences/Converters/File Format/EPS
help?
I added the format 0 as other file format and it doesn't help. Moreover
it does not make sense to add 0 as new format because pseudo-eps
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Oscar == =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Oscar L=F3pez?= ISO-8859-15 writes:
Oscar Hello lyxers I have recently upgraded to lyx-1.2.3 from lyx
Oscar -1.1.6fix4 and I am experiencing some problems with the
Oscar inclusion of graphic files. I am trying to include the output
Oscar of
Oscar López wrote:
This foo.# is an almost eps file. In fact if someone tries to view
this eps using gv an error is triggered. Only latex when this file
is included using \includegraphics knows how to proceed
You can make it into an adult EPS file by adding command
prologues:=1;
to the
Hello lyxers
I have recently upgraded to lyx-1.2.3 from lyx -1.1.6fix4 and I am
experiencing some problems with the inclusion of graphic files. I am
trying to include the output of metapost files, let's say fnflm.0 and
when I try to view the postscript lyx says that:
No information for
Oscar López wrote:
No information for converting from 0 to eps
Does adding 0 to Edit/Preferences/Converters/File Format/EPS
help?
Matej
--
Matej Cepl,
Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC
138 Highland Ave. #10, Somerville, Ma 02143, (617) 623-1488
Opinions founded on
Oscar == =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Oscar L=F3pez?= ISO-8859-15 writes:
Oscar Hello lyxers I have recently upgraded to lyx-1.2.3 from lyx
Oscar -1.1.6fix4 and I am experiencing some problems with the
Oscar inclusion of graphic files. I am trying to include the output
Oscar of metapost files, let's say
Matej Cepl wrote:
Oscar López wrote:
No information for converting from 0 to eps
Does adding 0 to Edit/Preferences/Converters/File Format/EPS
help?
I added the format 0 as other file format and it doesn't help. Moreover
it does not make sense to add 0 as new format because pseudo-eps
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Oscar == =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Oscar L=F3pez?= ISO-8859-15 writes:
Oscar Hello lyxers I have recently upgraded to lyx-1.2.3 from lyx
Oscar -1.1.6fix4 and I am experiencing some problems with the
Oscar inclusion of graphic files. I am trying to include the output
Oscar of
Oscar López wrote:
This foo.# is an almost eps file. In fact if someone tries to view
this eps using gv an error is triggered. Only latex when this file
is included using \includegraphics knows how to proceed
You can make it into an adult EPS file by adding command
prologues:=1;
to the
Hello lyxers
I have recently upgraded to lyx-1.2.3 from lyx -1.1.6fix4 and I am
experiencing some problems with the inclusion of graphic files. I am
trying to include the output of metapost files, let's say fnflm.0 and
when I try to view the postscript lyx says that:
No information for
Oscar López wrote:
> No information for converting from 0 to eps
Does adding 0 to Edit/Preferences/Converters/File Format/EPS
help?
Matej
--
Matej Cepl,
Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC
138 Highland Ave. #10, Somerville, Ma 02143, (617) 623-1488
Opinions founded on
> "Oscar" == =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Oscar L=F3pez?= writes:
Oscar> Hello lyxers I have recently upgraded to lyx-1.2.3 from lyx
Oscar> -1.1.6fix4 and I am experiencing some problems with the
Oscar> inclusion of graphic files. I am trying to include the output
Oscar> of metapost files, let's say
Matej Cepl wrote:
Oscar López wrote:
No information for converting from 0 to eps
Does adding 0 to Edit/Preferences/Converters/File Format/EPS
help?
I added the format 0 as other file format and it doesn't help. Moreover
it does not make sense to add 0 as new format because pseudo-eps
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Oscar" == =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Oscar L=F3pez?= writes:
Oscar> Hello lyxers I have recently upgraded to lyx-1.2.3 from lyx
Oscar> -1.1.6fix4 and I am experiencing some problems with the
Oscar> inclusion of graphic files. I am trying to include the output
Oscar> of
Oscar López wrote:
> This foo.# is an almost eps file. In fact if someone tries to view
> this eps using gv an error is triggered. Only latex when this file
> is included using \includegraphics knows how to proceed
You can make it into an adult EPS file by adding command
prologues:=1;
to the
84 matches
Mail list logo
