Re: article (koma-script) with smallest font size

2001-04-23 Thread Jacek M. Holeczek
Hi, Thanks for reply. do you have layout-document-fontsize-standard ? it seems not to work when you choose any value there. Yes, I have already noticed it (you mean default here, right ?). i have no problems with the sizes for the headings, look at attached ps-file for the first page.

Re: Math-MathPanel-Matrix problem (spaces too wide)

2001-04-23 Thread Jacek M. Holeczek
Hi, Many thanks. \AtBeginDocument{\addtolength{\arraycolsep}{-2pt}} The following string (in the LaTeX Preamble) : \AtBeginDocument{\addtolength{\arraycolsep}{-4pt}} did the trick (-2pt is too few). Jacek.

Re: article (koma-script) with smallest font size

2001-04-23 Thread Herbert Voss
Jacek M. Holeczek wrote: Your ps-files are copies of Intro.lyx. By default it's class is article and not article (koma-script). I took the same test. When I leave the Layout-Document Layout- Class - article I get proper sizes. But, it is sufficient to change it into article (koma-script)

Re: article (koma-script) with smallest font size

2001-04-23 Thread Jacek M. Holeczek
Hi, Many thanks. write in latex preamble \AtBeginDocument{ \let\size@part\Huge \let\size@partnumber\huge \let\size@section\Large \let\size@subsection\large \let\size@subsubsection\normalsize \let\size@paragraph\normalsize \let\size@subparagraph\normalsize}

Problem compiling lyx1.1.6fix1 on rh7.0 alpha (bis)

2001-04-23 Thread Yann MORERE
Hello the dream team... I've got problem compiling the 1.1.6fix1 release of lyx here is the gcc compiler [yann@noemi yann]$ gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/alpha-redhat-linux/2.96/specs gcc version 2.96 2731 (Red Hat Linux 7.0) [yann@noemi yann]$ here is the linux box

Re: Problem compiling lyx1.1.6fix1 on rh7.0 alpha (bis)

2001-04-23 Thread Tuukka Toivonen
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Yann MORERE wrote: I've got problem compiling the 1.1.6fix1 release of lyx ../../src/gettext.h:46: warning: identifier name `_' conflicts with GNU C++ internal naming strategy gettext is the Native Language Support library. If it is ok to use english with LyX try to

fancyhdr versus koma-script

2001-04-23 Thread Detlev Humann
Hi! I'm writing in book-koma-script-style andI´d like to use fancyhdr, too. Unfortunately it is obviously impossible to use the koma-script-command \headfont while working withfancyhdr (no effects to the header-style). Is there any other possibilityto change the font (fonttype, -size)

Re: symbol missing in lyx window

2001-04-23 Thread Rem
More specifically, I can not see any of the symbols on the lyx screen (not even integration and summation!). I tried the rpms, and even compiling from the source... Nothing works out. I wonder if it is a font problem somewhere? thanks in advance remzi - Original Message - From: Remzi

Re: symbol missing in lyx window

2001-04-23 Thread Tuukka Toivonen
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Rem wrote: More specifically, I can not see any of the symbols on the lyx screen (not even integration and summation!). I tried the rpms, and even compiling from the source... Nothing works out. I wonder if it is a font problem somewhere? Yes, I had similar problem

screen font

2001-04-23 Thread Shawn Koons
Hello, I have recently installed RH6.2 and Lyx1.1.6fix1 on an old Compaq laptop. Lyx's on-screen font is very strange (looks like a combination or westminster and playbill fonts in Word2000) and is very hard on the eyes. Is there a way that it can be corrected to a more readable font (I prefer

Re: screen font

2001-04-23 Thread Christopher Jones
Edit-Preferences-Screen Fonts On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, you wrote: Hello, I have recently installed RH6.2 and Lyx1.1.6fix1 on an old Compaq laptop. Lyx's on-screen font is very strange (looks like a combination or westminster and playbill fonts in Word2000) and is very hard on the eyes. Is

Re: symbol missing in lyx window

2001-04-23 Thread Matej Cepl
On April 23 2001 16:50 Tuukka Toivonen wrote: I fixed the problem by editing /etc/XF86Config (or /etc/X11/XF86Config in redhat, it seems) by swapping the FontPath definitions in another order. Try that or commenting out all fontpaths which are not absolutely necessary. Well, I feel rather

Re: article (koma-script) with smallest font size

2001-04-23 Thread Jacek M. Holeczek
Hi, Thanks for reply. do you have layout-document-fontsize-standard ? it seems not to work when you choose any value there. Yes, I have already noticed it (you mean default here, right ?). i have no problems with the sizes for the headings, look at attached ps-file for the first page.

Re: Math-MathPanel-Matrix problem (spaces too wide)

2001-04-23 Thread Jacek M. Holeczek
Hi, Many thanks. \AtBeginDocument{\addtolength{\arraycolsep}{-2pt}} The following string (in the LaTeX Preamble) : \AtBeginDocument{\addtolength{\arraycolsep}{-4pt}} did the trick (-2pt is too few). Jacek.

Re: article (koma-script) with smallest font size

2001-04-23 Thread Herbert Voss
Jacek M. Holeczek wrote: Your ps-files are copies of Intro.lyx. By default it's class is article and not article (koma-script). I took the same test. When I leave the Layout-Document Layout- Class - article I get proper sizes. But, it is sufficient to change it into article (koma-script)

Re: article (koma-script) with smallest font size

2001-04-23 Thread Jacek M. Holeczek
Hi, Many thanks. write in latex preamble \AtBeginDocument{ \let\size@part\Huge \let\size@partnumber\huge \let\size@section\Large \let\size@subsection\large \let\size@subsubsection\normalsize \let\size@paragraph\normalsize \let\size@subparagraph\normalsize}

Problem compiling lyx1.1.6fix1 on rh7.0 alpha (bis)

2001-04-23 Thread Yann MORERE
Hello the dream team... I've got problem compiling the 1.1.6fix1 release of lyx here is the gcc compiler [yann@noemi yann]$ gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/alpha-redhat-linux/2.96/specs gcc version 2.96 2731 (Red Hat Linux 7.0) [yann@noemi yann]$ here is the linux box

Re: Problem compiling lyx1.1.6fix1 on rh7.0 alpha (bis)

2001-04-23 Thread Tuukka Toivonen
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Yann MORERE wrote: I've got problem compiling the 1.1.6fix1 release of lyx ../../src/gettext.h:46: warning: identifier name `_' conflicts with GNU C++ internal naming strategy gettext is the Native Language Support library. If it is ok to use english with LyX try to

fancyhdr versus koma-script

2001-04-23 Thread Detlev Humann
Hi! I'm writing in book-koma-script-style andI´d like to use fancyhdr, too. Unfortunately it is obviously impossible to use the koma-script-command \headfont while working withfancyhdr (no effects to the header-style). Is there any other possibilityto change the font (fonttype, -size)

Re: symbol missing in lyx window

2001-04-23 Thread Rem
More specifically, I can not see any of the symbols on the lyx screen (not even integration and summation!). I tried the rpms, and even compiling from the source... Nothing works out. I wonder if it is a font problem somewhere? thanks in advance remzi - Original Message - From: Remzi

Re: symbol missing in lyx window

2001-04-23 Thread Tuukka Toivonen
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Rem wrote: More specifically, I can not see any of the symbols on the lyx screen (not even integration and summation!). I tried the rpms, and even compiling from the source... Nothing works out. I wonder if it is a font problem somewhere? Yes, I had similar problem

screen font

2001-04-23 Thread Shawn Koons
Hello, I have recently installed RH6.2 and Lyx1.1.6fix1 on an old Compaq laptop. Lyx's on-screen font is very strange (looks like a combination or westminster and playbill fonts in Word2000) and is very hard on the eyes. Is there a way that it can be corrected to a more readable font (I prefer

Re: screen font

2001-04-23 Thread Christopher Jones
Edit-Preferences-Screen Fonts On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, you wrote: Hello, I have recently installed RH6.2 and Lyx1.1.6fix1 on an old Compaq laptop. Lyx's on-screen font is very strange (looks like a combination or westminster and playbill fonts in Word2000) and is very hard on the eyes. Is

Re: symbol missing in lyx window

2001-04-23 Thread Matej Cepl
On April 23 2001 16:50 Tuukka Toivonen wrote: I fixed the problem by editing /etc/XF86Config (or /etc/X11/XF86Config in redhat, it seems) by swapping the FontPath definitions in another order. Try that or commenting out all fontpaths which are not absolutely necessary. Well, I feel rather

Re: article (koma-script) with smallest font size

2001-04-23 Thread Jacek M. Holeczek
Hi, Thanks for reply. > do you have layout->document->fontsize->standard ? > it seems not to work when you choose any value there. Yes, I have already noticed it (you mean "default" here, right ?). > i have no problems with the sizes for the headings, > look at attached ps-file for the first

Re: Math->MathPanel->Matrix problem ("spaces" too wide)

2001-04-23 Thread Jacek M. Holeczek
Hi, Many thanks. > \AtBeginDocument{\addtolength{\arraycolsep}{-2pt}} The following string (in the LaTeX Preamble) : \AtBeginDocument{\addtolength{\arraycolsep}{-4pt}} did the trick ("-2pt" is too few). Jacek.

Re: article (koma-script) with smallest font size

2001-04-23 Thread Herbert Voss
"Jacek M. Holeczek" wrote: > > Your ps-files are copies of Intro.lyx. By default it's class is > "article" and not "article (koma-script)". I took the same test. > When I leave the "Layout->Document Layout-> Class -> article" I get proper > sizes. But, it is sufficient to change it into "article

Re: article (koma-script) with smallest font size

2001-04-23 Thread Jacek M. Holeczek
Hi, Many thanks. > write in latex preamble > > \AtBeginDocument{ > \let\size@part\Huge > \let\size@partnumber\huge > \let\size@section\Large > \let\size@subsection\large > \let\size@subsubsection\normalsize > \let\size@paragraph\normalsize >

Problem compiling lyx1.1.6fix1 on rh7.0 alpha (bis)

2001-04-23 Thread Yann MORERE
Hello the dream team... I've got problem compiling the 1.1.6fix1 release of lyx here is the gcc compiler [yann@noemi yann]$ gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/alpha-redhat-linux/2.96/specs gcc version 2.96 2731 (Red Hat Linux 7.0) [yann@noemi yann]$ here is the linux box

Re: Problem compiling lyx1.1.6fix1 on rh7.0 alpha (bis)

2001-04-23 Thread Tuukka Toivonen
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Yann MORERE wrote: > I've got problem compiling the 1.1.6fix1 release of lyx > ../../src/gettext.h:46: warning: identifier name `_' conflicts with GNU > C++ internal naming strategy gettext is the Native Language Support library. If it is ok to use english with LyX try to

fancyhdr versus koma-script

2001-04-23 Thread Detlev Humann
Hi! I'm writing in book-koma-script-style and I´d like to use fancyhdr, too. Unfortunately it is obviously impossible to use the koma-script-command \headfont while working with fancyhdr (no effects to the header-style). Is there any other possibility to change the font (fonttype, -size)

Re: symbol missing in lyx window

2001-04-23 Thread Rem
More specifically, I can not see any of the symbols on the lyx screen (not even integration and summation!). I tried the rpms, and even compiling from the source... Nothing works out. I wonder if it is a font problem somewhere? thanks in advance remzi - Original Message - From: "Remzi

Re: symbol missing in lyx window

2001-04-23 Thread Tuukka Toivonen
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Rem wrote: > More specifically, I can not see any of the symbols on the lyx screen (not > even integration and summation!). I tried the rpms, and even compiling from > the source... Nothing works out. I wonder if it is a font problem somewhere? Yes, I had similar problem

screen font

2001-04-23 Thread Shawn Koons
Hello, I have recently installed RH6.2 and Lyx1.1.6fix1 on an old Compaq laptop. Lyx's on-screen font is very strange (looks like a combination or westminster and playbill fonts in Word2000) and is very hard on the eyes. Is there a way that it can be corrected to a more readable font (I prefer

Re: screen font

2001-04-23 Thread Christopher Jones
Edit->Preferences->Screen Fonts On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, you wrote: > Hello, > > I have recently installed RH6.2 and Lyx1.1.6fix1 on an old Compaq > laptop. Lyx's on-screen font is very strange (looks like a combination > or westminster and playbill fonts in Word2000) and is very hard on the >

Re: symbol missing in lyx window

2001-04-23 Thread Matej Cepl
On April 23 2001 16:50 Tuukka Toivonen wrote: > I fixed the problem by editing /etc/XF86Config (or > /etc/X11/XF86Config in redhat, it seems) by swapping the > "FontPath" definitions in another order. Try that or > commenting out all fontpaths which are not absolutely > necessary. Well, I feel