ClassicThesis

I try to use ClassicThesis under Lyx. I unpacked this: (classicthesis-v4.2 is a bugfix release of the classic thesis template that for the first time introduces BibLaTeX, a powerful package for formatting citations and references. Due to lacking support in LyX, several hacks have been applied

Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:53:06AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > Are lyx2.2.0rc1 (11.4.16) and lyx2.2.0 (23.5.16) identical? > Wolfgang No they're significantly different. I highly recommend you use the final 2.2.0 over rc1. Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?

On 31.05.2016 08:58, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:53:06AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: Are lyx2.2.0rc1 (11.4.16) and lyx2.2.0 (23.5.16) identical? Wolfgang No they're significantly different. I highly recommend you use the final 2.2.0 over rc1. Scott Thanks,

lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?

Are lyx2.2.0rc1 (11.4.16) and lyx2.2.0 (23.5.16) identical? Wolfgang

Re: Upgrading to Lyx 2.2

Am Montag, den 30.05.2016, 11:02 +0200 schrieb UD: > Thanks a lot--  I have now upgraded to 2.2 without issues.  Now if I > could only get the Lyx icons on my Yoga 2 Pro HiDPI to be a little > bigger so I could actually see them, I might even be happy! Try right-click on the toolbar and select

Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > > > On 31.05.2016 08:58, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:53:06AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > > Are lyx2.2.0rc1 (11.4.16) and lyx2.2.0 (23.5.16) identical? > Wolfgang > > No

Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?

On 31.05.2016 10:11, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: On 31.05.2016 10:06, Liviu Andronic wrote: On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: On 31.05.2016 08:58, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:53:06AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann

Re: Upgrading to Lyx 2.2

Den 31. mai 2016 01:27, skrev Paul A. Rubin: "Complete" reinstall actually left my ~/.lyx directory intact, so it worked out fine. This is as expected with Debian/Ubuntu. "apt" and "dpkg" is not supposed to touch anything in ~/ (/home/) at all, these utiltites only work with system

Re: ClassicThesis

On 31.05.2016 10:10, Liviu Andronic wrote: On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: I try to use ClassicThesis under Lyx. I unpacked this: (classicthesis-v4.2 is a bugfix release of the classic thesis template that for the first time introduces

Re: ClassicThesis

Wolfgang, if this is the first time to use classicthesis in Lyx then you might get classicthesis 4.1 first and the wait till your distributions are fit and complete for version 4.2 which is downwards compatible to version 4.1 AFAIK version 4.2 also depends on some latest coma-packages that are

Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?

Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2016 um 10:15:32, schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann > > On 31.05.2016 10:11, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > > > > > > On 31.05.2016 10:06, Liviu Andronic wrote: > >> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann > >>

Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?

Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2016 um 10:50:38, schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann > >> I compiled it from source > > With cmake or automake help? > > In case you used cmake, you could create a debian package. Installing and > > de-installing is easy in that case. > > > >

Re: ClassicThesis

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > I try to use ClassicThesis under Lyx. > I unpacked this: > (classicthesis-v4.2 is a bugfix release of the classic thesis template that > for the first time introduces BibLaTeX, a powerful package for

Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?

On 31.05.2016 10:06, Liviu Andronic wrote: On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: On 31.05.2016 08:58, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:53:06AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: Are lyx2.2.0rc1 (11.4.16) and lyx2.2.0

Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?

On 31.05.2016 10:27, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2016 um 10:15:32, schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann On 31.05.2016 10:11, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: On 31.05.2016 10:06, Liviu Andronic wrote: On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann

Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:10:17AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > > > On 31.05.2016 08:58, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:53:06AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > > > Are lyx2.2.0rc1 (11.4.16) and lyx2.2.0 (23.5.16) identical? > > > Wolfgang > > No they're

Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?

Den 31. mai 2016 10:50, skrev Wolfgang Engelmann: I used ./configure --with-version-suffix=22 and make and #make install so probably neither one Wolfgang Removing rc1 is not necessary for correct operation of lyx 2.2.0 in this case. The rc1 lyx you compiled is named "lyx-22", and won't

Re: Question about development of non-linear writing project

tom gmx.at> writes: > > > > I am worried about this issue too. No traces of this on the webpages and > > lyx-outline which was a working fork with the corkboard developed by Rob > > Oakes seems dead for a while now. This i a giant improvement for Lyx and it > > would be really sad if it was

Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:10:17AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: >> >> How do I effectively remove the rc1 lyx. I have it and 2.2.0 (myx lyx22) >> side by side > > You're on Linux right? I'm not sure of the best way to remove it. We > don't have an uninstall target

Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:38:17PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:10:17AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > >> > >> How do I effectively remove the rc1 lyx. I have it and 2.2.0 (myx lyx22) > >> side by side > > > > You're on Linux right? I'm

Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?

Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2016 um 16:09:26, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:38:17PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:10:17AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > > >> > > >> How do I effectively remove the

LyX Qt5 PPA (was: Re: Upgrading to Lyx 2.2)

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Montag, den 30.05.2016, 11:02 +0200 schrieb UD: >> Thanks a lot-- I have now upgraded to 2.2 without issues. Now if I >> could only get the Lyx icons on my Yoga 2 Pro HiDPI to be a little >> bigger so I could

Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:05:59PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2016 um 16:09:26, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:38:17PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:10:17AM +0200,

Re: Trouble Typesetting English & Korean

Sorry for the spam, but after more searching, one can enter 'mj' in Document -> Settings -> Fonts -> CJK. I'll leave this here in case someone searches the archive; hopefully it will be a help. That said, I was originally looking through the Text style dialog for this setting (expecting that one

Re: Embedding asymptote in Lyx

On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 12:07:58PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > Cyril wrote: > > > The converter is from what initial format ? I guess the final is PDF. > > But the initial one is LaTeX, LyX,...? > > That depends. I guess you want to use pdflatex for direct pdf production. In > that case, use

Trouble Typesetting English & Korean

LyX Users (& Devs.), I'm having trouble typesetting some Korean within a primarily English document. Please see the attached minimal .lyx file. This was created by entering the following text

Re: Lyx Change tracking show changes in output not working with displayed equations

On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 02:05:09PM -0500, David Halpern wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to print a hardcopy changes in output (deleted and added). > If what I deleted does not contain a displayed equation, I can export the > contents of my lyx file to a pdf file, and then print it out. However, if

Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?

On 31.05.2016 11:35, Helge Hafting wrote: Den 31. mai 2016 10:50, skrev Wolfgang Engelmann: I used ./configure --with-version-suffix=22 and make and #make install so probably neither one Wolfgang Removing rc1 is not necessary for correct operation of lyx 2.2.0 in this case. The rc1 lyx

Re: ClassicThesis

On 31.05.2016 12:11, Michael Berger wrote: Wolfgang, if this is the first time to use classicthesis in Lyx then you might get classicthesis 4.1 first and the wait till your distributions are fit and complete for version 4.2 which is downwards compatible to version 4.1 AFAIK version 4.2 also

Re: No graphics preview within LyX

Le lundi 30 mai 2016 à 13:51 +0200, Kornel Benko a écrit : > Am Montag, 30. Mai 2016 um 13:40:16, schrieb Daniel CLEMENT > > > Le lundi 30 mai 2016 à 13:24 +0200, Kornel Benko a écrit : > > > Am Montag, 30. Mai 2016 um 13:10:40, schrieb Daniel CLEMENT > > >

Consecutive numbering in KOMA-Script article

Hello, I have a question regarding the numeration in KOMA-script article. I would like to have consecutive numbering starting from the beginning (with 1) in each section. Right now the numbering is consecutive throughout the whole document. After each section it just continues, while I would like