On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 06:32:57PM +0200, Jean-Pierre.Chretien wrote:
Hi Jean-Pierre,
I know that you made a question but I haven't seen it. I got only a
truncated message with quoted text...
This happens sometimes, and I don't know why... the only pattern I see
is that those
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 06:32:57PM +0200, Jean-Pierre.Chretien wrote:
Hi Jean-Pierre,
I know that you made a question but I haven't seen it. I got only a
truncated message with quoted text...
This happens sometimes, and I don't know why... the only pattern I see
is that those
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 06:32:57PM +0200, Jean-Pierre.Chretien wrote:
>
Hi Jean-Pierre,
I know that you made a question but I haven't seen it. I got only a
truncated message with quoted text...
This happens sometimes, and I don't know why... the only pattern I see
is that those
On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, George De Bruin wrote:
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 15:04:55 -0500
From: George De Bruin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Reuben Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED],
LyX Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Languages (was Re: sorting tables?)
On Friday 01 June 2001 05:16, Reuben
On Tuesday 29 May 2001 23:46, Allan Rae wrote:
FWIW, a number of Python folk are interested in LyX -- both for personal
use (with python.cls etc.) and as a possible unofficial documenting tool.
Their official documenting tools are a couple of scripts and any text
editor and they aren't about
On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, George De Bruin wrote:
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 15:04:55 -0500
From: George De Bruin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Reuben Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED],
LyX Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Languages (was Re: sorting tables?)
On Friday 01 June 2001 05:16, Reuben
On Tuesday 29 May 2001 23:46, Allan Rae wrote:
FWIW, a number of Python folk are interested in LyX -- both for personal
use (with python.cls etc.) and as a possible unofficial documenting tool.
Their official documenting tools are a couple of scripts and any text
editor and they aren't about
On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, George De Bruin wrote:
> Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 15:04:55 -0500
> From: George De Bruin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Reuben Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> LyX Users mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Languages (was Re: sorting ta
On Tuesday 29 May 2001 23:46, Allan Rae wrote:
> FWIW, a number of Python folk are interested in LyX -- both for personal
> use (with python.cls etc.) and as a possible unofficial documenting tool.
> Their official documenting tools are a couple of scripts and any text
> editor and they aren't
On Sat, 2 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 01 June 2001 05:16, Reuben Thomas wrote:
There's also Lua (www.lua.org), which is much smaller than python, rather
I just tried to go to this site, but couldn't connect to it...:(
The link above doesn't seem to work now, but there is
On Sat, 2 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 01 June 2001 05:16, Reuben Thomas wrote:
There's also Lua (www.lua.org), which is much smaller than python, rather
I just tried to go to this site, but couldn't connect to it...:(
The link above doesn't seem to work now, but there is
On Sat, 2 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Friday 01 June 2001 05:16, Reuben Thomas wrote:
>
> > There's also Lua (www.lua.org), which is much smaller than python, rather
>
> I just tried to go to this site, but couldn't connect to it...:(
The link above doesn't seem to work now, but
On Friday 01 June 2001 05:16, Reuben Thomas wrote:
There's also Lua (www.lua.org), which is much smaller than python, rather
I just tried to go to this site, but couldn't connect to it...:(
--
George J. De Bruin
Check Out 0l0rin's New Age compositions at http://mp3.com/0l0rin
0l0rin's latest
On Friday 01 June 2001 05:16, Reuben Thomas wrote:
There's also Lua (www.lua.org), which is much smaller than python, rather
I just tried to go to this site, but couldn't connect to it...:(
--
George J. De Bruin
Check Out 0l0rin's New Age compositions at http://mp3.com/0l0rin
0l0rin's latest
On Friday 01 June 2001 05:16, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> There's also Lua (www.lua.org), which is much smaller than python, rather
I just tried to go to this site, but couldn't connect to it...:(
--
George J. De Bruin
Check Out 0l0rin's New Age compositions at http://mp3.com/0l0rin
0l0rin's
Anyway, past discussions have usually ended up with Python as best because
it's readable/writable even for newbies. Scheme/Lisp usually dropped as a
bad idea because no-one cares to type all the ()'s and Perl as a possible
second language.
There's also Lua (www.lua.org), which is
Anyway, past discussions have usually ended up with Python as best because
it's readable/writable even for newbies. Scheme/Lisp usually dropped as a
bad idea because no-one cares to type all the ()'s and Perl as a possible
second language.
There's also Lua (www.lua.org), which is
> > > Anyway, past discussions have usually ended up with Python as best because
> > > it's readable/writable even for newbies. Scheme/Lisp usually dropped as a
> > > bad idea because no-one cares to type all the ()'s and Perl as a possible
> > > second language.
There's also Lua (www.lua.org),
Allan Rae a écrit :
[...]
Anyway, past discussions have usually ended up with Python as best because
it's readable/writable even for newbies. Scheme/Lisp usually dropped as a
bad idea because no-one cares to type all the ()'s and Perl as a possible
second language.
What are the
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 01:58:18PM +0200, ben wrote:
Allan Rae a écrit :
[...]
Anyway, past discussions have usually ended up with Python as best because
it's readable/writable even for newbies. Scheme/Lisp usually dropped as a
bad idea because no-one cares to type all the ()'s and
Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 17:09:14 +0100
From: Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LyX Users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Languages (was Re: sorting tables?)
Mail-Followup-To: LyX Users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 01:58:18PM +0200, ben wrote
Allan Rae a écrit :
[...]
Anyway, past discussions have usually ended up with Python as best because
it's readable/writable even for newbies. Scheme/Lisp usually dropped as a
bad idea because no-one cares to type all the ()'s and Perl as a possible
second language.
What are the
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 01:58:18PM +0200, ben wrote:
Allan Rae a écrit :
[...]
Anyway, past discussions have usually ended up with Python as best because
it's readable/writable even for newbies. Scheme/Lisp usually dropped as a
bad idea because no-one cares to type all the ()'s and
Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 17:09:14 +0100
From: Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LyX Users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Languages (was Re: sorting tables?)
Mail-Followup-To: LyX Users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 01:58:18PM +0200, ben wrote
Allan Rae a écrit :
> [...]
>
> Anyway, past discussions have usually ended up with Python as best because
> it's readable/writable even for newbies. Scheme/Lisp usually dropped as a
> bad idea because no-one cares to type all the ()'s and Perl as a possible
> second language.
What are the
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 01:58:18PM +0200, ben wrote:
> Allan Rae a écrit :
>
> > [...]
> >
> > Anyway, past discussions have usually ended up with Python as best because
> > it's readable/writable even for newbies. Scheme/Lisp usually dropped as a
> > bad idea because no-one cares to type all
>>Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 17:09:14 +0100
>>From: Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: LyX Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: Re: Languages (was Re: sorting tables?)
>>Mail-Followup-To: LyX Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>User
On Sun, 27 May 2001, Kathryn Andersen wrote:
[...]
[ Baruch wrote this bit ]
The implementation as I expect it to be, will not force you to use one
language over the other, only if you want the official scripts you'll
need the official language. There is a need however to make the
On Sun, 27 May 2001, Kathryn Andersen wrote:
[...]
[ Baruch wrote this bit ]
The implementation as I expect it to be, will not force you to use one
language over the other, only if you want the official scripts you'll
need the official language. There is a need however to make the
On Sun, 27 May 2001, Kathryn Andersen wrote:
[...]
[ Baruch wrote this bit ]
> > The implementation as I expect it to be, will not force you to use one
> > language over the other, only if you want the official scripts you'll
> > need the official language. There is a need however to make the
> >
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 07:11:51PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
* George De Bruin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010526 19:05]:
On Wednesday 23 May 2001 11:17, Baruch Even wrote:
To follow up on these comments and enthusiasm (and a developers
discussion), what is the language of choice for such an
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 07:11:51PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
* George De Bruin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010526 19:05]:
On Wednesday 23 May 2001 11:17, Baruch Even wrote:
To follow up on these comments and enthusiasm (and a developers
discussion), what is the language of choice for such an
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 07:11:51PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
> * George De Bruin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010526 19:05]:
> > On Wednesday 23 May 2001 11:17, Baruch Even wrote:
> >
> > > To follow up on these comments and enthusiasm (and a developers
> > > discussion), what is the language of choice
33 matches
Mail list logo
