Re: Install lyx 2.2.2.1

2017-03-09 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2017-03-09, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > Am 09.03.2017 um 12:19 schrieb Guenter Milde: >> On 2017-03-09, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann would lyx2.2.2 (instead of lyx2.2.2.1) still need Unstable (or sid) in the repos? And

Re: Install lyx 2.2.2.1

2017-03-09 Thread Wolfgang Engelmann
Am 09.03.2017 um 15:34 schrieb Guenter Milde: On 2017-03-09, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: Am 09.03.2017 um 12:19 schrieb Guenter Milde: On 2017-03-09, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann would lyx2.2.2 (instead of lyx2.2.2.1) still need Unstable

Re: Install lyx 2.2.2.1

2017-03-09 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann < engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de> wrote: > Thanks, Liviu, > > would lyx2.2.2 (instead of lyx2.2.2.1) still need Unstable (or sid) in the > repos? And does this lyx2.2.2 version contain already the bibtex related > error reporting? These are the

Re: Install lyx 2.2.2.1

2017-03-09 Thread Wolfgang Engelmann
Am 09.03.2017 um 10:01 schrieb Liviu Andronic: On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann > wrote: Thanks, Liviu, would lyx2.2.2 (instead of lyx2.2.2.1) still need Unstable (or sid) in the repos? And does

Re: Install lyx 2.2.2.1

2017-03-09 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2017-03-09, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann >> > wrote: >> Thanks, Liviu, >> would lyx2.2.2 (instead of lyx2.2.2.1) still need Unstable (or >> sid) in the repos? And

Re: Install lyx 2.2.2.1

2017-03-09 Thread Wolfgang Engelmann
Am 08.03.2017 um 21:50 schrieb Liviu Andronic: On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann > wrote: Am 08.03.2017 um 19:52 schrieb Liviu Andronic: On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 7:38 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann

Re: Install lyx 2.2.2.1

2017-03-09 Thread Wolfgang Engelmann
Am 09.03.2017 um 12:19 schrieb Guenter Milde: On 2017-03-09, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann > wrote: Thanks, Liviu, would lyx2.2.2 (instead of lyx2.2.2.1) still need Unstable