Am 09.03.2017 um 15:34 schrieb Guenter Milde:
On 2017-03-09, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Am 09.03.2017 um 12:19 schrieb Guenter Milde:
On 2017-03-09, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
would lyx2.2.2 (instead of lyx2.2.2.1) still need Unstable
On 2017-03-09, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> Am 09.03.2017 um 12:19 schrieb Guenter Milde:
>> On 2017-03-09, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
would lyx2.2.2 (instead of lyx2.2.2.1) still need Unstable (or
sid) in the repos? And
Am 09.03.2017 um 12:19 schrieb Guenter Milde:
On 2017-03-09, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
> wrote:
Thanks, Liviu,
would lyx2.2.2 (instead of lyx2.2.2.1) still need Unstable
On 2017-03-09, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
>> > wrote:
>> Thanks, Liviu,
>> would lyx2.2.2 (instead of lyx2.2.2.1) still need Unstable (or
>> sid) in the repos? And
Am 09.03.2017 um 10:01 schrieb Liviu Andronic:
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
> wrote:
Thanks, Liviu,
would lyx2.2.2 (instead of lyx2.2.2.1) still need Unstable (or
sid) in the repos? And does
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann <
engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
> Thanks, Liviu,
>
> would lyx2.2.2 (instead of lyx2.2.2.1) still need Unstable (or sid) in the
> repos? And does this lyx2.2.2 version contain already the bibtex related
> error reporting? These are the
Am 08.03.2017 um 21:50 schrieb Liviu Andronic:
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann
> wrote:
Am 08.03.2017 um 19:52 schrieb Liviu Andronic:
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 7:38 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann <
engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
>
>
> Am 08.03.2017 um 19:52 schrieb Liviu Andronic:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 7:38 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann <
> engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
>
>>
>> sorry, here we are:
>>
>> downloaded from
>>
Am 08.03.2017 um 19:52 schrieb Liviu Andronic:
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 7:38 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann
> wrote:
sorry, here we are:
downloaded from
https://packages.debian.org/sid/lyx
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 7:38 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann <
engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
>
> sorry, here we are:
>
> downloaded from
> https://packages.debian.org/sid/lyx
>
> Debian version:
> we$ cat /proc/version
> Linux version 3.16.0-4-amd64 (debian-ker...@lists.debian.org) (gcc
> version
Am 08.03.2017 um 19:03 schrieb Liviu Andronic:
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann
> wrote:
I have downloaded lyx_2.2.2-1_amd64.deb but get this error:
Where did you download it from? For what distribution?
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Wolfgang Engelmann <
engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
> I have downloaded lyx_2.2.2-1_amd64.deb but get this error:
>
Where did you download it from? For what distribution?
Please give more information about your system.
Liviu
> Dependency is not satisfiable:
12 matches
Mail list logo