Re: intltool won't install because of the old XML::Parser not found issue

2012-03-16 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 16, 2012, at 01:12, Ryan Schmidt wrote: What happens when you run this: perl5.12 -e require XML::Parser In my second prefix, it generates an error about Expat.bundle being the wrong architecture, so there's at least one thing we need to fix in p5.12-xml-parser. This is already

Re: intltool won't install because of the old XML::Parser not found issue

2012-03-16 Thread Jeff Singleton
Same thing it does when I run --- perl5.14 -e require XML::Parser Can't locate XML/Parser4.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /opt/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.1/darwin-multi-2level /opt/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.1 /opt/local/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.14.1/darwin-multi-2level

Re: intltool won't install because of the old XML::Parser not found issue

2012-03-16 Thread Jeff Singleton
Yep that bug is way closer to correctness … now I think we are on to something. I just tried that 0.50.2 version and it does the same thing…so I wouldn't rush pushing that one into the tree just yet. On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.orgwrote: On Mar 16, 2012,

Re: intltool won't install because of the old XML::Parser not found issue

2012-03-16 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 16, 2012, at 01:23, Jeff Singleton wrote: Yep that bug is way closer to correctness … now I think we are on to something. I've set up a separate MacPorts prefix, in which I'll try to build all p5.12 ports with a non-standard build_arch. That should help me determine whether arch

Re: intltool won't install because of the old XML::Parser not found issue

2012-03-16 Thread Jeff Singleton
Yeah that's fine with me... FYI...I just tried that hack mentioned in the bug, but its not getting past configure, so I am not sure what good changing gcc and g++ to force -m32 is gonna do. :/ On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.orgwrote: On Mar 16, 2012, at

Re: intltool won't install because of the old XML::Parser not found issue

2012-03-16 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 16, 2012, at 01:30, Ryan Schmidt wrote: I've set up a separate MacPorts prefix, in which I'll try to build all p5.12 ports with a non-standard build_arch. I'm a little blocked on this... I can't get any p5 ports to install in a clean prefix: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/33647

Unable to compile libplist 1.8 on macport 2.0.4

2012-03-16 Thread Michael Parchet
Hello, I can't update all my package because I can't compile libplist 1.8. For more information, please see this ticket. https://trac.macports.org/ticket/33431 I don't know what I can do. Can you help me please ? Best regards mparchet ___

Re: Ruby problem

2012-03-16 Thread Phil Dobbin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 15/03/2012 23:11, Phillip Koebbe wrote: On Mar 15, 2012, at 5:42 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Mar 15, 2012, at 13:17, Phillip Koebbe wrote: If I'm following along correctly (and I very well may not be), you're thinking that calling 'sudo

Re: Ruby problem

2012-03-16 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 07:09, Phil Dobbin phildob...@gmail.com wrote: However, the other thing I discovered was that if I source my bash_profile in any tab or window, the Ruby again switches to the /opt/local/bin/ruby (opening a new window or tab reverts this behaviour to what's actually

Re: Ruby problem

2012-03-16 Thread Phillip Koebbe
On Mar 16, 2012, at 6:09 AM, Phil Dobbin wrote: At this point, having spent far too long on this, I'm just about to cut my losses uninstall the Ruby in /opt/local just get on with things. I sent in my experiment just to provide another sample of RVM and MacPorts, but I don't have a ruby

Re: Unable to compile libplist 1.8 on macport 2.0.4

2012-03-16 Thread Lawrence Velázquez
On Mar 16, 2012, at 6:03 a.m., Michael Parchet wrote: I can't update all my package because I can't compile libplist 1.8. Try Ryan's suggestion, from the original thread you started: Your error is: Warning: Xcode appears to be installed but xcodebuild is unusable; some ports will likely

Re: openssl and openssh

2012-03-16 Thread Jan Stary
On Mar 15 22:21:12, Brandon Allbery wrote: OpenSSL as a project desperately needs to be replaced with something sane. Replaced where? OpenSSL and OpenSSH are both intimately related to (and developed on) OpenBSD; there is no way they will 'replace' it with some other implementation.

Re: openssl and openssh

2012-03-16 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 13:04, Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote: On Mar 15 22:21:12, Brandon Allbery wrote: OpenSSL as a project desperately needs to be replaced with something sane. Replaced where? OpenSSL and OpenSSH are both intimately related to (and developed on) OpenBSD; there is no way

Re: openssl and openssh

2012-03-16 Thread Christopher Vance
OpenSSH is developed on OpenBSD, as are lots of other Open* things. OpenSSL is not one of these - it has always been a separate project. -- Christopher On 17 March 2012 04:11, Brandon Allbery allber...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 13:04, Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote: On Mar 15