On Oct 8, 2008, at 3:10 AM, C. Florian Ebeling wrote:
In short, if we agree to the plan Markus, Juan and James
proposed and open up the floor for nominations for PortMgr
membership, I would be honored to accept your nomination. :-)
Ok, then I hereby officially nominate you :) I wanted to do
Good afternoon all!
Since this morning we've decided to open up editing access to our
wiki to all those registered Trac users, not just projects members as
it used to be until now.
This means that from now on any of you (with a valid Trac
registration) will be able to jump
On May 2, 2008, at 10:35 AM, Alakazam wrote:
Hello,
seeing that there has been no progress on the octave port for the
last couple of months, even though many users have encountered
problems with it, I think the Portfile could be advantageously
upgraded with the one proposed on Ticket
On Jan 27, 2008, at 4:26 PM, David Meili wrote:
Hello,
I only tried to install macports today and don't understand much in
the mails i read here, so maybe I should first do some more reading,
but any help would be appreciated a lot.
I have mac os x 10.4.11, installed xcode and macports,
On Jan 27, 2008, at 9:26 PM, Rainer Müller wrote:
Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
curl -O http://svn.macports.org/repository/macports/branches/release_1_6/base/portmgr/dmg/postflight
sudo ./postflight
I think you have to do
chmod +x postflight
before you are able to execute it.
Rainer
On Jan 28, 2008, at 1:26 AM, Hector Zenil wrote:
Hello,
I have installed both XCode Tools and X11 on my Mac and I am getting
this failed message at the end of the installation:
Install Failed: run postflight script
However it seems that it makes the install into the /opt directory so
when
Our energetic sysadmins are working hard to improve our Mac OS Forge
experience by yet again boosting server performance. For this reason
there will be a scheduled 30 minutes downtime on Monday, January 28th,
8pm PST, so lets plan ahead our svn commits and ticket activity to
make room
As some of you may have seen, I've been improving the postflight
script in the release_1_6 branch with the feedback I've received so
far, plus some other relevant fixes/improvements. The final product is
what will be in the 1.6.1 pkg installer, which I plan to upload to our
website to
On Jan 9, 2008, at 5:28 PM, Matrix Mole wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I just obtained a new mac mini today with Leopard installed on it.
Since
this is my first experience with 10.5, I'm still learning some things.
One of the first things I did though was to install
On Jan 9, 2008, at 2:00 AM, Stefan Schwarzer wrote:
Here are the info. Can it be that it can't connect to MacPorts (for
an update or so) which causes the problem? I am behind a firewill -
will have to ask the admin to open port 873 - if that's correct
Jan 9 07:25:23 gridmac7
On Jan 9, 2008, at 4:20 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Jan 9 07:25:24 gridmac7 runner[18974]: postflight[18990]:
Synchronizing local ports tree from rsync://rsync.macports.org/
release/ports/
Jan 9 07:25:24 gridmac7 runner[18974]: postflight[18990]:
Jan 9 07:25:24 gridmac7 runner[18974]:
On Jan 10, 2008, at 2:02 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jan 10, 2008, at 00:12, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
This is already fixed and will be in the next MacPorts pkg
installer, whenever that comes around (I'll think about re-
releasing the 1.6.0 installers with an improved script
On Jan 9, 2008, at 1:13 AM, Stefan Schwarzer wrote:
I wanted to install MacPorts on my Mac - MacPro with Leopard,
latest version. But, while using the disk image, the installation
finished with this message: The following install step failed:
run postflight script for MacPorts-1.6.0.
Our New ticket form up at trac.macports.org had a ticket component
of Infrastructure to classify requests to our Mac OS Forge host on
hosting and server side functionality related issues. Such naming was
clearly not very understood and a lot of people have been filing
regular tickets
Good day everyone!
I am glad to announce that after a long delay in extensive testing,
MacPorts 1.6.0 has finally been released! It is available through all
of our regular channels:
-) selfupdate for existing users;
-) universal pkg installers for both Leopard and Tiger (PPC pkg
11/21/07 7:57:19 PM org.macports.mysql5[1531] Starting MySQL
/*** not sure if these are relevant ***/
11/21/07 7:57:19 PM com.apple.launchd[1] (0x10dfa0.nohup[1553])
Could not setup Mach task special port 9: (os/kern) no access
11/21/07 7:57:19 PM com.apple.launchd[1] (0x10dfa0.nohup[1554])
When moving away from the Trac ticket configuration we started with
when moving to Mac OS Forge (priorities like Expected severities
like Data loss, for instance) and moved to our more sane current
values (High, Normal, Low, etc), some tickets were lost in the
Reports area as the
Good evening everyone!
Very pleased to announce that thanks to the service migrations that
our host Mac OS Forge has been undergoing, and to the dedication Bill
(our admin) has been putting into it, Trac ticket activity mailing has
been finally enabled for ticket creators,
Morning everyone!
This is a heads-up message to let everyone know that in an about two
hours Bill will start migrating both trac subversion to new
hardware, so those two services will be down during the process, as
explained last week. We'll inform of progress.
Thanks
Hello everyone!
Subversion and Trac servers are now back online and operational,
running 1.4.5 and 0.10.4, respectively, on new hardware. Please give
them a try and feel free to report any findings you have.
These upgrades will now allow us to do some cool things like
On Nov 8, 2007, at 6:03 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
What were you expecting to see? If you want to see the new web site
served up thru a PHP interpreter, that's currently happening at a
URL which I forget but I'm sure someone will reply with it.
http://apollo.homeunix.net/macports ,
Hello everyone!
Next Monday the 12th our host Mac OS Forge will be migrating our
Trac and Subversion services over to new hardware, for which they
will both be down starting at around 8am California time (PST) and
for the approximate duration of a full hour, plus some extra time
Let me make a couple of general comments to help clear up this
confusion:
On Oct 26, 2007, at 1:56 PM, paul beard wrote:
On 10/25/07, Daniel J. Luke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 24, 2007, at 10:11 PM, James Sumners wrote:
Why doesn't MacPorts supply binary packages?
No one has
I forgot the icing on the cake:
On Oct 27, 2007, at 6:20 PM, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
Building (binary) *packages* (and not archives as produced by
archivemode and as explained by Anders), is one of MacPorts topmost
long term goals, but trust me when I say that doing them
Good evening everyone!
MacPorts 1.5.2 is now available through selfupdate to temporarily
downgrade from fatal errors to warnings all the mtree violations some
ports are showing. Users should upgrade to this new release but still
report in trac tickets when ports violate the
Evening everyone!
I'm pleased to announce that MacPorts 1.5.1 has been released
through selfupdate, comprising the following fixes and enhancements:
Release 1.5.1 (11-August-2007 at branches/release_1_5/base's r27646,
by jmpp):
- Remove sed rules taking care of dp based
On Aug 11, 2007, at 11:26 AM, Jeff Stubbs wrote:
On Aug 11, 2007, at 3:32 AM, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
- Detect some mtree violations within ${prefix}. Test can be
overriden by destroot.violate_mtree yes in a Portfile
(mww in r27199).
Just a note.
Upgraded MP to 1.5.10
On Jul 22, 2007, at 2:26 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
The latest development version of the MacPorts code, which may not
work or may not work with the current portfiles, is:
http://svn.macports.org/repository/macports/trunk/base/
There is no URL which always points to the latest stable
On Jul 21, 2007, at 5:01 PM, Tabitha McNerney wrote:
Hi,
Maybe a silly question, but with the namespace transition in
MacPorts 1.5 now complete and moved away from DarwinPorts and
OpenDarwin, I am wondering if the IRC channel that one can join
in for MacPorts discussion and help is
On Jul 14, 2007, at 10:48 AM, TjL wrote:
(reposting... I sent this 5 days ago but no replies)
On Jul 10, 2007, at 2:54 AM, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
I am glad to announce that we've finally finished the 1.5.0
edition of MacPorts, readily available through all our regular
distribution
Begin forwarded message:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: July 16, 2007 2:42:35 PM GMT-04:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [27045] trunk/dports/security/cyrus-sasl2/Portfile
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Revision 27045
Author [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date 2007-07-16 11:42:34 -0700 (Mon, 16 Jul
Thanks for the great documentation progress guys!
I cleaned up some of our documentation tickets up on trac:
*) renamed the doc component to guide
*) relocated most of the old doc component tickets I could find to
more appropriate components, of course leaving there the ones
On Jul 11, 2007, at 12:45 AM, Malcolm Fitzgerald wrote:
I've just done this and it suggests checking /opt/local/var/db/dports
and move the left-overs manually. Looking in there I can see two
directories, build and sources. build contains a lot of stuff and
sources contains one file,
On Jul 11, 2007, at 2:33 AM, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
On Jul 11, 2007, at 12:45 AM, Malcolm Fitzgerald wrote:
I've just done this and it suggests checking /opt/local/var/db/dports
and move the left-overs manually. Looking in there I can see two
directories, build and sources. build
On Jul 11, 2007, at 2:58 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jul 11, 2007, at 01:33, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
On Jul 11, 2007, at 12:45 AM, Malcolm Fitzgerald wrote:
I've just done this and it suggests checking /opt/local/var/db/
dports
and move the left-overs manually. Looking in there I can
Evening everyone!
I am glad to announce that we've finally finished the 1.5.0 edition
of MacPorts, readily available through all our regular distribution
means:
-) binary installer for both 10.4 (Universal) and 10.3, http://
The reason why you now see the full list of ports when you sync your
tree, as opposed to a delta with only the files that have seen
changes since your last sync, is that I changed the way in which the
rsync repos feeding your ports and base trees are populated.
The operation used to
On Jul 5, 2007, at 6:04 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jul 5, 2007, at 16:50, Peter Farsinsen wrote:
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Please sudo port sync and try again. It may take up to 12 hours
for the change to become available.
That's just great!
Should I just do the port sync or should I upgrade
Hi Mark!
I've only managed to skim over your draft but I think it seems
pretty good to begin with, kudos!
Even though the existing guide is pretty outdated in some aspects, I
wouldn't know where to stand between this draft of yours and our
existing sources (there is some good
RESENT: with a proper title this time! (second time this has happened
in the last couple days, but I'm not drunk though, I promise!)
Good afternoon everyone! I've recently created two new milestones in
our trac roadmap, http://trac.macports.org/projects/macports/roadmap,
called Feature
,...
-jmpp
On Jun 20, 2007, at 10:13 AM, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
On Jun 20, 2007, at 8:20 AM, Adam Mercer wrote:
On 19/06/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see some commits from 3 days ago still is not available after
an rsync.
Does something need to be restarted?
I'm seeing
Hello Jaroslav.
On Apr 7, 2007, at 12:18 PM, Jaroslav Hron wrote:
My settings in port.conf are:
rsync_serverrsync.macports.org
rsync_dir dpupdate/base/
I am really curious how you got that particular setting for the
rsync_dir, do you happen to
On Apr 9, 2007, at 11:19 AM, Paul Beard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Apr 9, 2007, at 2:22 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Do we want to do that? Admittedly wikis are easier to edit. But
wasn't the docbook format chosen for a reason? To those who remember:
What was
On Apr 9, 2007, at 1:37 PM, Jaroslav Hron wrote:
Hi, yes the dpupdate1 to dpupdate was a hand edit at the time when
darwinports.org didn't work for some reason and change to macports.org
was the solution...
I like to know what's in my .conf files and dpupdate1/base
was strange to me since
On Apr 9, 2007, at 1:46 PM, Landon Fuller wrote:
On Apr 9, 2007, at 10:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But the disadvantage, as opposed to a Wiki, is that joe user can't
make
changes to the docs. And that is what people want. Although I wonder
if
we have Joe user contributing to the docs if
Evening everyone! Thanks to the kind help provided by Elias Pipping,
our new project roadmap is up at:
http://trac.macports.org/projects/macports/roadmap
For those of you who actively use it, the major changes you'll notice
are that the Available Ports milestone has been deleted (tickets
On Feb 21, 2007, at 7:49 PM, Elias Pipping wrote:
in case that's supposed to be a make parameter the answer is no, though
On Feb 22, 2007, at 12:38 AM, Daniel Llorens del Río wrote:
Hello,
is there a simple way to compile all my packages with -m64?
Thanks,
Daniel.
port
On Feb 21, 2007, at 9:17 PM, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
port install portname make.args=arg should force port(1) to use
arg as the value of the corresponding key, 'make.args' in this case.
However, that might override the make.args value listed in the
Portfile, if any, so before you
Hello everyone! Of the small list of ports I maintain, I consider the
Cyrus imap mail server related ones to be the most important
(cyrus-imapd cyrus-sasl2). However, I currently don't have the time
nor appropriate hardware to dedicate to full maintainership of such a
complex port (I'm
49 matches
Mail list logo
