RE: autoconf upgrade problem

2008-05-05 Thread josh.soref
Kwan Hong Lee wrote: For some reason, even if I have the new autoconf directory added to the beginning of the directory, when I call pulseaudio/autogen.sh it uses the older autoconf, currently 2.59. I can't modify sb_autoconf_wrapper because it's read only. What can I do? Please don't

Re: Opensource locked by hardware key was Re: Corporate ownership of open source projects [LWN]

2008-05-05 Thread Raphaël Jacquot
On Sat, 2008-05-03 at 17:22 +, Darius Jack wrote: ... sorry (cut for clarity) I the meantime I was contacted and learneed that offered software was opensource (no GNU Open Sourrce licence included). Unfortunately software - firmware for Wifi Access Points is offered hardware key

Prelinking and GNU Hashstyle on maemo?

2008-05-05 Thread Ben Martin
Hi, I notice that back in the maemo 3.x days there was a prelink package for maemo [1]. Was this deprecated in favour of another approach? I have recently ported libferris [3] to maemo chinook. I still have to perform integration into the maemo environment and hildon customization and other

Diablo, do we need a separate repository?

2008-05-05 Thread Niels Breet
Hi all, As you probably all know Diablo, the next revision of the IT OS, is coming out sooner or later. Diablo will be binary compatible with chinook, but there will be two additions. There will be a new email framework and a newer version of libssl (0.9.8) because of requirements for the WiMax

Re: Diablo, do we need a separate repository?

2008-05-05 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
Dnia Monday 05 of May 2008, Niels Breet napisał: As you probably all know Diablo, the next revision of the IT OS, is coming out sooner or later. Diablo will be binary compatible with chinook, but there will be two additions. There will be a new email framework and a newer version of libssl

Re: kernel patches, Re: DSP framebuffer access on N8x0

2008-05-05 Thread Kees Jongenburger
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Frantisek Dufka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Simon Pickering wrote: This requires two things, a kernel patch, and adding a FRAMEBUFFER section to the /lib/dsp/avs_kernelcfg.cmd file. See https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3123 for the patch. Nice.

Re: Diablo, do we need a separate repository?

2008-05-05 Thread Ryan Pavlik
Niels Breet wrote: On Mon, May 5, 2008 13:58, Rafael Proença wrote: Do we need a separate extras repository for diablo or should we just add a link to chinook? My guess is that if you link diablo to chinook what will happen is that all the chinook boxes will be upgraded to

Re: Diablo, do we need a separate repository?

2008-05-05 Thread Marius Vollmer
ext Marcin Juszkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Does someone work on apt-get update;apt-get upgrade from Chinook to Diablo then? No, unfortunately not. We are working to get apt-get upgrade working for releases that come after Diablo. I agree that a smooth upgrade path is needed: without

Re: Opensource locked by hardware key was Re: Corporate ownership of open source projects [LWN]

2008-05-05 Thread Darius Jack
My dear friend,software fromhttp://approsoftware.com/is exactly declared as Linux open software product.Unfortunately its offered as a commercial product at high chargeas hardware lock key is installed to make itnot to function without hardware lock key installed.I have already contacted Free

Re: Corporate ownership of open source projects [LWN]

2008-05-05 Thread Dave Neary
Hi Andrew, Andrew Flegg wrote: On the back of my post, maemo.org: what next?[1], it was interesting to read in yesterday's LWN that the community around OpenSolaris feels very much shut out of internal Sun development processes: http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/280452/8f5b64d861d8f79e/

Re: Opensource locked by hardware key was Re: Corporate ownership of open source projects [LWN]

2008-05-05 Thread Darius Jack
Please read the followingfromhttp://approsoftware.com/en/aboutus.htmlopen-source software based on Linux OS is being sold as a commercial producthttp://approsoftware.com/en/howtobuy.html About us

Re: Corporate ownership of open source projects [LWN]

2008-05-05 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
Dnia Monday 05 of May 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: unfortunately the closed part (umac.ko) is full kernel module not linkable object file so it too depends on kernel version and sadly even specific kernel configuration So close, and yet so far away. I would

Re: Corporate ownership of open source projects [LWN]

2008-05-05 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
Dnia Saturday 03 of May 2008, Igor Stoppa (Nokia) napisał: Sadly the padlock (and i'm not denying that there is one) is around some of the most boring or crufty stuff, not really on the family jewels. The padlock is on many things which got limited just because no one took a moment to

Re: Prelinking and GNU Hashstyle on maemo?

2008-05-05 Thread pancake
maemo has its own precaching system afaik (compiles the programs as libraries and thread them with maemo-invoker, maemo-launcher ,... but this is only for the apps build as libraries which are mostly the ones provided by nokia. I didn't tried prelude or libferris on arm yet. but i found quite

Re: Corporate ownership of open source projects [LWN]

2008-05-05 Thread Igor Stoppa
On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 22:30 +0200, ext Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: Dnia Saturday 03 of May 2008, Igor Stoppa (Nokia) napisał: Sadly the padlock (and i'm not denying that there is one) is around some of the most boring or crufty stuff, not really on the family jewels. The padlock is on

Re: Prelinking and GNU Hashstyle on maemo?

2008-05-05 Thread Ben Martin
On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 03:59 +0200, pancake wrote: I didn't tried prelude or libferris on arm yet. but i found quite interesting the use of the diablo toolkit for optimizing binaries at linkage time. The one show stopper here is, from their home page: Diablo only works on statically linked