Hi!
2011/1/27 Riku Voipio riku.voi...@nokia.com:
On 01/25/2011 05:24 PM, ext Andrew Flegg wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 15:03, Felipe Crochik fel...@crochik.com wrote:
A new version of an existing application should have a lower barrier to
promotion than a new application.
It's obvious;
Hi,
i have the same problem with my two applications. kfzcheck [1] and
kfzcheck-extras [2]. Because many people don't use extras-testing and
extras-devel. Lots of people haven't seen the apps and can decide if it
can be useful and give feedback to me for improvements.
The two apps are now in
On czw, 2011-01-27 at 15:16 +0100, Patrick Beck wrote:
Because many people don't use extras-testing and
extras-devel. Lots of people haven't seen the apps and can decide if
it can be useful and give feedback to me for improvements.
There are a lot of people using extras-testing and even
Hi,
On 27 January 2011 16:05, Tomasz Sterna to...@xiaoka.com wrote:
There are a lot of people using extras-testing and even extras-devel.
Not many of them know or care about the web voting and approval system.
+1 :)
or better... we need a way to let people know if the application
listed come
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 15:09, a.gra...@gmail.com a.gra...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 January 2011 16:05, Tomasz Sterna to...@xiaoka.com wrote:
There are a lot of people using extras-testing and even extras-devel.
Not many of them know or care about the web voting and approval system.
or
We have had this discussion few months back but unfortunately it didn't lead
to any action.
It seems that the pieces are out there: appdownloader, Faster Application
Manager and maybe the testing application (can't remember the
name...sorry). I think, at least, the first two are Qt based and,
Sorry wrong button Hit reply and not reply to all this is the
message I just sent to Andrew:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Felipe Crochik fel...@crochik.com
Date: Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: adaptation of Extras QA hurdles
To: Andrew Flegg and...@bleb.org
Hi,
On 27 January 2011 16:25, Felipe Crochik fel...@crochik.com wrote:
Sorry if the question is silly but why do you think enhancing HAM is better
than creating a new application based on appdownloader, FAP and KISSTester?
all I know is that all people I asked to, told me that they would
Hi,
at the beginning of the n900 device with maemo 5 many people have seen a
risk at installing applications from extras-devel. I think the most
important problem was the full rootfs (not optified). I mean after pr1.2
was the problem no more possible, but the users has still not installed
apps
That is scary :)
I have never checked out the source code of any of them and don't even know
who the FAP developer is.
I have to say that I like how the 3 of them work. If we are going to take on
making a better tool we should aim high. It needs to be more than an
application manager it needs to
I wouldn't mind testing it. Can you tell us what it is about?
Felipe
-Original Message-
From: maemo-developers-boun...@maemo.org
[mailto:maemo-developers-boun...@maemo.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Beck
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 10:54 AM
To: maemo-developers
Subject: Re: adaptation of
Sorry I did again... Here is the message:
-Original Message-
From: Felipe Crochik [mailto:fel...@crochik.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 11:01 AM
To: 'a.gra...@gmail.com'
Cc: 'maemo-developers@maemo.org'
Subject: RE: adaptation of Extras QA hurdles
That is scary :)
I have never
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 15:29, a.gra...@gmail.com a.gra...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 January 2011 16:25, Felipe Crochik fel...@crochik.com wrote:
Sorry if the question is silly but why do you think enhancing HAM is better
than creating a new application based on appdownloader, FAP and KISSTester?
Hi,
the short-version: It's a lookup tool for license plates. It's
interesting to know from which regions of a country the other peoples
come. Or you can play a game with other people to guess right from which
region the car comes ;)
kfzcheck has different files for many countrys (in which it is
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Felipe Crochik fel...@crochik.com wrote:
I have to say that I like how the 3 of them work. If we are going to take on
making a better tool we should aim high. It needs to be more than an
application manager it needs to be a tool for the user to find and decide
On Thursday 27 January 2011 18:07:32 Andrew Flegg wrote:
Unless we take extraordinary (and almost certainly self-defeating)
actions like requiring KISStester to be installed to use any software
from Extras-(devel|testing).
In fact, I would very specifically argue against such an approach. The
This sounds like an even more interesting idea! It would be make for a very
not-exclusive-to-maemo project. Isn't any of the distributions working on
something like this? Why not?
For maemo the issue then becomes that it is not about just finding
developers to write an application but that we
http://wiki.maemo.org/ICD_Policy_Plugins
This should mean people can have more control over how icd2 manages
networks (e.g. how it chooses which network to connect to at any given time)
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
Hi Attila and all,
2011/1/27 Attila Csipa ma...@csipa.in.rs:
On Thursday 27 January 2011 18:07:32 Andrew Flegg wrote:
Unless we take extraordinary (and almost certainly self-defeating)
actions like requiring KISStester to be installed to use any software
from Extras-(devel|testing).
In
19 matches
Mail list logo
