-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Getting involved in the Debian Derivative Census is a great way to preserve the
life of your Maemo software and potentially expand your user base. This
forwarded email contains a lot more information and some requests for the use
of SHA1 sums
Hello,
I sent an email to the maemo-community list but I think it is equally l
relevant here so I'm forwarding a link. The mail begins;
I'd like to say to the Maemo Council, old and new, that there is an
excellent way to move Maemo forward. Not just as a legacy operating
system for Nokia
On Mar 29, 2011, at 11:17, Hector Oron wrote:
2011/3/29 Jeremiah Foster jerem...@jeremiahfoster.com:
I'd like to say to the Maemo Council, old and new, that there is an
excellent way to move Maemo forward. Not just as a legacy operating
system for Nokia devices, but even for newer devices
On Apr 20, 2010, at 11:15 AM, David King wrote:
On 2010-04-19 16:50, Dave Neary dne...@maemo.org wrote:
Hi,
Dave Neary wrote:
I documented the packaging of a C app (using autotools for building) a
while back in the wiki:
http://wiki.maemo.org/Packaging#A_concrete_example_-_rot13
This
On Apr 12, 2010, at 8:24 PM, Niels Breet wrote:
Hi
Hi,
Could someone explain what the packages interface considers my
application as a library ?
http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-devel_fr
ee_armel/libellule/0.0.1-3/
This is a rather lame check I added
On Mar 30, 2010, at 12:54 PM, Daniil Ivanov wrote:
Hi all!
Hi there!
I'm trying to produce sample theme package using Maemo Theme Maker 1.2.9:
https://garage.maemo.org/projects/thememaker/
I haven't use that tool before unfortunately, so I can't give you any advice
except to contact the
On Mar 30, 2010, at 2:24 PM, Daniil Ivanov wrote:
Hi!
Sorry, I forgot to mention pretty relevant information, that I'm
searching for a one-button-press solution,
which will be used on Windows by people with no Linux experience, so
manual package creation is a no go solution.
Then why
On Mar 29, 2010, at 11:00 AM, Attila Csipa wrote:
On Monday 29 March 2010 08:07:06 Marius Vollmer wrote:
all the good stuff in them, because they know that these repositories
are well-maintained and backed by a community: packages are not
abandoned, and they can expect them to be updated
On Mar 26, 2010, at 8:19 AM, Matti Airas wrote:
On 25.03.2010 18:10, ext Dave Neary wrote:
There is an alternative - if Benoît does not want to deal with Extras,
and others feel that the packages he was packaging are vital, someone
else can take over as official packager and deal with all
On Mar 25, 2010, at 8:52 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
There were plans to start using lintian from Debian for automatic checks of
Maemo packages. So far it looks like there were plans only.
Lintian, with Nokia additions, is used by Nokia to do testing internally.
I have set up a Maemian
On Mar 26, 2010, at 9:36 AM, Marius Vollmer wrote:
ext Urho Konttori urho.kontt...@gmail.com writes:
Also, the current model of centralized gigantic repository does not
scale up too well. Just look at the state of using extras-devel is on
the current devices (hint: slow pain).
[ Urho,
On Mar 26, 2010, at 3:00 PM, Marius Vollmer wrote:
ext Jeremiah Foster jerem...@jeremiahfoster.com writes:
One huge issue with the repository is the tool used on the backend:
apt-ftparchiver. This tool cannot automatically remove debs and source
packages, causing huge disk bloat (some
On Mar 26, 2010, at 5:22 PM, Samir Faci (Dev) wrote:
Or you know... wait for it to be released first and see what it looks
like first hand? Just a thought..
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Dave Neary dne...@maemo.org wrote:
Hi,
Jeremiah Foster wrote:
On Mar 26, 2010, at 3:00 PM
On Mar 23, 2010, at 10:35 PM, Klaus Rotter wrote:
Am 22.03.2010 16:22, schrieb Graham Cobb:
On Monday 22 March 2010 14:30:00 Matan Ziv-Av wrote:
- You can't easily remove a package from extras-devel. (Or maybe at all?
I asked for a package to be removed two weeks ago. It is still there).
On Mar 23, 2010, at 11:24 AM, Thomas Perl wrote:
2010/3/23 Andrew Flegg and...@bleb.org:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 00:20, Attila Csipa ma...@csipa.in.rs wrote:
On Tuesday 23 March 2010 00:39:09 Darren Long wrote:
However, in the general case where the source and the executable are not
the
Do these packages have other packages that depend on them?
Why are you guys interested in removing so many packages?
Jeremiah
On Mar 22, 2010, at 11:16 AM, David Hautbois wrote:
Hello
And please remove qypy too.
David.
Benoît HERVIER wrote:
Hi,
Please, can you remove all version of
On Mar 22, 2010, at 7:47 AM, Marius Vollmer wrote:
Stoppa Igor (Nokia-D/Helsinki) igor.sto...@nokia.com writes:
No at all: it's about standardization. The device must support a certain
set of features and provide well defined APIs.
So if a device is MeeGo compliant, it will be
On Mar 22, 2010, at 1:53 PM, Marius Vollmer wrote:
ext Jeremiah Foster jerem...@jeremiahfoster.com writes:
On Mar 22, 2010, at 7:47 AM, Marius Vollmer wrote:
In my view, MeeGo is a development effort, not a standardization
effort.
I am not convinced that this is true. It looks like
On Mar 1, 2010, at 8:26 AM, Marius Vollmer wrote:
ext Lucas Maneos ma...@subs.maneos.org writes:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 08:12:23AM +0200, Marius Vollmer wrote:
It might just be the missing public key. Without it, the signature on
your repo will not be recognized as valid, and it will be
On Feb 16, 2010, at 9:59 AM, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
Yves-Alexis Perez a écrit :
Absolutely right. The success of Ubuntu and Debian have proved this.
Aside of this, I am puzzled to see a project that it targeted to
support both X86 and ARM processors without even considering the
On Feb 16, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Pavel Rojtberg wrote:
Am 16.02.2010 10:16, schrieb Jeremiah Foster:
Intel and Nokia do not care about the implementation of the package system,
they just want revenue from app stores. The upshot from all of this is that
we are stuck with RPM, there is no going
On Feb 16, 2010, at 3:00 PM, Stuart Anderson wrote:
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Jeremiah Foster wrote:
I highly doubt the Linux Foundation is going to go back on the Linux
Standards Base and use .debs, but I do like your optimism. :)
Not that the LSB only specified the RPM package format
On Feb 16, 2010, at 5:18 PM, Pavel Rojtberg wrote:
Am 16.02.2010 14:36, schrieb Jeremiah Foster:
I highly doubt the Linux Foundation is going to go back on the Linux
Standards Base and use .debs, but I do like your optimism. :)
actually I only care what the MeeGo version will use
On Feb 16, 2010, at 5:27 PM, Thomas Tanner wrote:
On 16.02.10 17:18, Pavel Rojtberg wrote:
actually I only care what the MeeGo version will use that is supposed to
run on future Nokia handhelds.
Frankly, it is suicide not to switch to rpm.
you mean all .deb based distributions are doomed
Intel and Nokia collaboration: http://meego.com/
Jeremiah
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
On Feb 15, 2010, at 12:49 PM, Luca De Cicco wrote:
I guess that the follow ups of this story will be very interesting.
For starters,
MeeGo claims to target automotive, where Intel has a very thin market
share (if any).
Umm, perhaps you haven't seen the GenIVI consortium?
On Feb 15, 2010, at 1:41 PM, Andrei Mirestean wrote:
Yesterday evening it worked ok, but this morning I have the same problem.
Niels apparently was working on this.
Jeremiah
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Luca Donaggio donag...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems so... I promoted a package from
On Feb 15, 2010, at 12:49 PM, Luca De Cicco wrote:
I guess that the follow ups of this story will be very interesting.
For starters,
MeeGo claims to target automotive, where Intel has a very thin market
share (if any).
Umm, perhaps you haven't seen the GenIVI consortium?
On Feb 15, 2010, at 4:40 PM, Thomas Tanner wrote:
The problem is more complex than converting binary .debs to .rpms using
a hack.
alien is not a hack. It is packaged and maintained by Joey Hess who wrote
debhelper. Few people know more about debian's build system than Joey.
The
On Feb 9, 2010, at 2:29 PM, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
Ajai Khattri wrote:
Maybe there ought to be a link to the dh_make man page from there?
Which docs were you following, and how did you get there? we're trying
to make http://wiki.maemo.org/Packaging the standard quick start page,
and
On Feb 10, 2010, at 9:02 AM, Ajai Khattri wrote:
On Tue, 9 Feb 2010, Jeremiah Foster wrote:
Exactly. Thanks for pointing this out Marius. Unless I am mistaken Ajai,
you were referring to building multiple *package* binaries, correct?
(Not multiple application/runtime binaries.)
Just
On Feb 7, 2010, at 1:14 AM, ma...@bitblit.net wrote:
Ive built a command-line app. I can bring up the Maemo UI and run the tool
from Terminal just fine (from inside its source folder), however related
utilities that come with the tool dont work - Im assuming I need to do a
make install
On Feb 9, 2010, at 16:23, Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 12:19:10AM -0500, Ajai Khattri wrote:
Im trying to create my first Maemo package and I had a few questions:
1) This package has a main binary, but also has additional
binaries/scripts and library files, so do I
I think this is off-topic for this list Benoit. You may want to contact OVI
directly.
Jeremiah
On Feb 5, 2010, at 8:10 AM, Benoît HERVIER wrote:
Hi,
I've try to register myself on ovistore but my enterprise didn't have a vat
number as it is exempted from vat (European VAT not
Hi Ajai!
On Feb 8, 2010, at 6:19 AM, Ajai Khattri wrote:
Im trying to create my first Maemo package
Awesome! :)
and I had a few questions:
1) This package has a main binary, but also has additional
binaries/scripts and library files, so do I select 'Multiple binaries'
when running
Amazing stuff Jeff - really great!
On Feb 3, 2010, at 7:43 AM, Marius Vollmer wrote:
ext Jeff Moe m...@blagblagblag.org writes:
Do you have the build logs online as well?
Yes, from
http://obra.freemoe.org/freemoe-etch/3/3dchess/root.log
to
On Feb 1, 2010, at 18:05, Pavel Rojtberg wrote:
Am 01.02.2010 17:43, schrieb Bernd Stramm:
This area is sort of problematic in many respects. Hijacking someone's
package can suppress good work and good people. And it is quite
disrespectful.
what do you mean by Hijacking? Isnt this exactly
On Feb 1, 2010, at 7:13 AM, Ville M. Vainio wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 4:57 AM, ma...@bitblit.net wrote:
Im very interested in porting apps to Maemo but I have concerns about the
long-term maintenance of the apps.
Unfortunately the process is not codified, many assumptions are made.
On Jan 28, 2010, at 9:34 AM, Stefan Iwanowitsch wrote:
Hi everybody,
how can I obtain information about the installed applications
The command 'dpkg -l' will show you all installed packages on your device.
and access
their icons?
Icons are kept in specific directories on the device, I'll
On Jan 26, 2010, at 7:46 AM, Bjoern Ricks wrote:
Sorry didn't send my answer to the list.
Hi,
the last weeks I tried to get a new version of mysql to extras-devel
(http://repository.maemo.org/extras-devel/pool/fremantle/free/m/mysql-dfsg-5.0/).
Therefore I updated the old version to
On Jan 26, 2010, at 9:43 AM, Ove Kaaven wrote:
Jeremiah Foster skrev:
On Jan 25, 2010, at 22:27, Ed Bartosh wrote:
2010/1/25 Jeremiah Foster jerem...@jeremiahfoster.com:
There are other build tools which are better documented and more flexible
than sdbmock. Debian has a complete
On Jan 26, 2010, at 10:16 AM, Jeremiah Foster wrote:
without any assets of its own aside from SIP
I mean SPI of course. (Software in the Public Interest.)
Jeremiah
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org
On Jan 26, 2010, at 1:05 PM, Ed Bartosh wrote:
2010/1/26 Jeremiah Foster jerem...@jeremiahfoster.com:
What about tools like qemu and dpkg-cross? Can't they be used to build debs
without scratchbox?
And my goal is not to necessarily get rid of scratchbox, but rather enable
alternatives
Hello,
Bug #7505 asks if mauku is open or closed. According to the bug report, it
looks pretty closed.
https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7505
I installed mauku from the maemo extras free repository, believing it was Free
Software, but trying to figure out which license it is under, I
On Jan 22, 2010, at 21:10, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi all,
Due to popular demand, I sat down this week with Jeremiah Foster, who
explained to me the very quickest way to go about packaging an
application. We didn't quite get to uploading to extras, but going
from a .tar.gz to a correct .deb
On Jan 23, 2010, at 12:07, Ed Bartosh wrote:
2010/1/23 Jeff Moe m...@blagblagblag.org:
Could the configuration files of the build server and related scripts be put
up on the wiki or mailed here or something?
I had a build fail due to a small difference between the SDK and the
buildbox.
On Jan 25, 2010, at 16:22, Jeff Moe wrote:
On Saturday 23 January 2010 04:07:48 Ed Bartosh wrote:
2010/1/23 Jeff Moe m...@blagblagblag.org:
Could the configuration files of the build server and related scripts be
put up on the wiki or mailed here or something?
I had a build fail due to a
On Jan 25, 2010, at 22:27, Ed Bartosh wrote:
2010/1/25 Jeremiah Foster jerem...@jeremiahfoster.com:
There are other build tools which are better documented and more flexible
than sdbmock. Debian has a complete toolchain which is obviously good at
building debs and is completely open
On Jan 22, 2010, at 18:54, Aldon Hynes wrote:
I would respectfully suggest that engadget's view, while representing the
view of the person that wrote it, is perhaps no more or less representative
of the views of users than views expressed by developers on this list.
Except that Endgadget has
On Jan 22, 2010, at 11:49 AM, Eero Tamminen wrote:
Hi,
I was recently notified that in extras repository some package for
which I've been marked as maintainer, was causing an SSU (testing)
issue.
However, I hadn't uploaded that package.
The package was from SDK tools repository were
On Jan 22, 2010, at 2:19 PM, Ed Bartosh wrote:
2010/1/22 Andrew Flegg and...@bleb.org:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:59, Simon Pickering s.g.picker...@bath.ac.uk
wrote:
I'd suggest that the autobuilder checks to see that the uploader's email
address is included in one of the *Maintainer
-Original Message-
From: maemo-developers-boun...@maemo.org
[mailto:maemo-developers-boun...@maemo.org] On Behalf Of Simon Pickering
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 7:00 AM
To: 'Jeremiah Foster'; maemo-developers@maemo.org
Subject: RE: Maemo extras repository package uploader
I thought I would post a snippet from the Endgadget review that represents the
view of the users of Nokia's products. This is something that Nokia bears in
mind, even if we at maemo.org don't always, we tend to be self-selecting geeks.
After having dug in, we're seeing glimmers of brilliance
On Jan 21, 2010, at 1:35 AM, Graham Cobb wrote:
On Wednesday 20 January 2010 21:50:02 Jeremiah Foster wrote:
I disagree. Debian has very high quality packages and software.
I don't think we are disagreeing. I am saying Debian is geared to stability
and quality. I am just making
On Jan 21, 2010, at 1:35 AM, Graham Cobb wrote:
On Wednesday 20 January 2010 21:50:02 Jeremiah Foster wrote:
I disagree. Debian has very high quality packages and software.
I don't think we are disagreeing. I am saying Debian is geared to stability
and quality. I am just making
On Jan 21, 2010, at 3:54 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On 21/01/2010 11:46, Jeremiah Foster wrote:
For software and tools I agree. But processes will be very different.
Maemo
is not aiming for a release every 18 months, Debian is.
The official release time period is 24 months
On Jan 20, 2010, at 1:19 PM, Luca Donaggio wrote:
I've a (probably silly) question about package icons maemo package
interface:
- if I upload a new version of the same package with a different icon
(urlencoded in debian/control) the corresponding package interface's instance
of that
Hello,
Okay, so it's knives out is it? Fine. I have flame retardant underwear.
:-)
I know you want things to work smoothly, we all do. Believe me, the
admins are working their butts off to make it so, they work long days and have
been checking in on weekends too. I still see
On Jan 20, 2010, at 20:29, Niels Breet wrote:
Is this an effect of the PR 1.1 problem and I have to rebuild
libIllumination, too?
Yes. What you see there is that libillumination0 is built
against newer gstreamer and libosso (from pr1.1)
The fastest way to solve this is to submit the
On Jan 20, 2010, at 17:32, Jeff Moe wrote:
Can we, like with the opt problem, come to a solution with
community power[tm]?
For what it's worth, in the Fedora buildsystem (Koji), the buildsystem is
running with the latest updates. Perhaps investigating what the various other
distros do
On Jan 20, 2010, at 18:24, Graham Cobb wrote:
On Wednesday 20 January 2010 16:32:23 Jeff Moe wrote:
For what it's worth, in the Fedora buildsystem (Koji), the buildsystem is
running with the latest updates. Perhaps investigating what the various
other distros do (especially Debian) and doing
On Jan 20, 2010, at 23:21, Ryan Abel wrote:
On Jan 20, 2010, at 1:04 PM, Jeff Moe wrote:
I've seen frequent mentions of how distinct maemo.org is from Nokia. But the
reality seems that nothing at Maemo can really happen without Nokia's tacit
approval. Is there anyone that has server
On Jan 19, 2010, at 10:13 AM, tero.k...@nokia.com tero.k...@nokia.com wrote:
Some gems:
1) It's also important to set up an official web site which is down as
often as it's up. It's not enough to have no web site at all; in such
situations, the community has an irritating habit of creating
On Jan 19, 2010, at 11:02 AM, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
Edward Page wrote:
Is anyone collecting these How do I... questions and putting them on the
wiki?
http://wiki.maemo.org/Tutorials
http://wiki.maemo.org/User_FAQ
http://wiki.maemo.org/Developer_FAQ
Psst... don't tell anyone, but
On Jan 19, 2010, at 15:20, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
The user will be told why they can't update their little fart app.
We don't have fart apps in Maemo. You're thinking of the iPhone.
/facetiousness
Jeremiah
___
maemo-developers mailing list
On Jan 15, 2010, at 12:30 AM, Petite Escalope wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to build a package for the armel target but it fails on this error
:
dpkg-genchanges -b
dpkg-genchanges: failure: cannot read files list file: No such file or
directory
Everything is working with x86
What's
On Jan 15, 2010, at 10:27 AM, Marius Vollmer wrote:
Hi,
even I have noticed now that apt uses a lot more space than it used to.
One reason is that the package index files in the repository contain
entries for multiple versions of a package. This increases the size of
what apt has to
On Jan 11, 2010, at 9:55 PM, Till Harbaum / Lists wrote:
Hi,
Am Montag 11 Januar 2010 schrieb ibrahim:
I wonder how can I put some user-specific files on the filesystem that
can't get removed when my application package is uninstalled.
I am not sure that this is a good idea. The user
On Jan 12, 2010, at 1:16 PM, Till Harbaum / Lists wrote:
Hi,
Am Dienstag 12 Januar 2010 schrieb Mikko Vartiainen:
Any idea why my n900 doesn't see the update?
Have you accidentally removed SSU metapackage (mp-fremantle-generic-pr)?
Yes, i did. I once removed those pre-installed
On Jan 6, 2010, at 14:05, ibrahim wrote:
Kees Jongenburger wrote:
Hi ibrahim,
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 11:37 AM, ibrahim ibrahim@asgatech.com wrote:
you might want to look a what extra's devel's structure looks like
#source.list
#extras-devel
deb
On Jan 3, 2010, at 12:22, David Greaves wrote:
Jeff Moe wrote:
As far as I can tell, there are no mirrors of the repositories.
Pretty sure Nokia/maemo.org went with a CDN which satisfies all the points you
raised.
The maemo.org infrastructure problems are more to do with dynamic content
On Jan 2, 2010, at 21:54, Andrew Flegg wrote:
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 20:47, Micke Nordin mickew...@gmail.com wrote:
Am I missing something? Doesn't optification basicaly mean that
all you have to do is install a binary in your SDK and then you
have to add a single line to the rulesfile?
On Jan 3, 2010, at 17:37, Jeff Moe wrote:
On Sunday 03 January 2010 11:45:17 Jeremiah Foster wrote:
On Jan 3, 2010, at 12:22, David Greaves wrote:
Jeff Moe wrote:
As far as I can tell, there are no mirrors of the repositories.
Pretty sure Nokia/maemo.org went with a CDN which satisfies
On Jan 3, 2010, at 19:50, Andrew Flegg wrote:
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 14:37, Ed Bartosh bart...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway it was not working for a long time and people became confused.
Would some kind of Big Brother/Tivoli/monitoring system be worthwhile
investigating?
And now I'm
On Jan 3, 2010, at 20:13, Jeff Moe wrote:
On Sunday 03 January 2010 15:28:04 Jeremiah Foster wrote:.
Bugs URLs please. Hard facts please, stuff we can present to Nokia and say:
Akamai is not performing.
The only bug I know of is:
https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5818
I have
On Jan 4, 2010, at 24:28, Jeff Moe wrote:
It wasn't my intention to provide some big mirror for people to use myself, I
was just suggesting the project have mirrors.
Oh, I misunderstood. I thought you were offering to mirror the repos publicly.
You just want your own local mirror. That
On Jan 1, 2010, at 15:00, Ed Bartosh wrote:
2010/1/1 Andrew Flegg and...@bleb.org:
Hi,
Attempting to upload a new version of vim to the Fremantle
auto-builder, I get the following failure:
https://garage.maemo.org/builder/fremantle/vim_7.2-0maemo6/armel.root.log.FAILED.txt
Should
Hi Bryan,
My name is Jeremiah Foster and I am the debmaster at maemo.org. I have
seen a lot of your uploads recently which duplicate what already exists in the
maemo repositories. In fact, some of these things, like debconf for example,
might conflict with the development environment
On Jan 1, 2010, at 15:12, Ed Bartosh wrote:
2010/1/1 Jeremiah Foster jerem...@jeremiahfoster.com:
On Jan 1, 2010, at 15:00, Ed Bartosh wrote:
2010/1/1 Andrew Flegg and...@bleb.org:
now why, because it was working just fine before.
This reminds me aphorisms like 'Too many cooks spoil
On Jan 1, 2010, at 16:22, Bryan Jacobs wrote:
Jeremiah,
I needed ss-dev, debconf-utils, and a few other packages which *were*
built from the Nokia official sources but which *were not* present in
any repository I could find. The packages I built which are also in
the official Nokia
On Jan 1, 2010, at 16:00, Jeff Moe wrote:
On Friday 01 January 2010 11:37:24 you wrote:
2010/1/1 Jeff Moe m...@blagblagblag.org:
On Friday 01 January 2010 11:12:47 Ed Bartosh wrote:
2010/1/1 Jeremiah Foster jerem...@jeremiahfoster.com:
On Jan 1, 2010, at 15:00, Ed Bartosh wrote:
2010/1/1
On Dec 31, 2009, at 16:42, ibrahim wrote:
case SIGHUP:
log_message(LOG_FILE,hangup signal catched);
Sorry to be pedantic, but the past tense of 'catch' is 'caught'. 'Catched'
might be confused with 'cached' which is not what you want.
Jeremiah
On Dec 19, 2009, at 11:07, Arkady Glazov wrote:
Hi,
Can i drop my unuse pacakge from Maemo extras-devel repositories?
Yes. In general it is best to contact someone about a package you want removed,
usually that someone is Niels or myself. :)
Is
there any interface for it?
At the moment
On Dec 14, 2009, at 14:02, Anderson Lizardo wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Marius Vollmer
marius.voll...@nokia.com wrote:
On balance, I think it is better to just stick to debhelper 5 in
Fremantle.
And from our experience in PyMaemo backporting various (but not that
many)
On 12/6/09 12:37 PM, Simon Pickering wrote:
Hello everyone
I've packaged up and pushed libgmp to extras-devel, but obviously made a
mistake in the Debianisation as it's trying to install a file to my
build directory (so don't try installing it yet). I can guess why the
code I inserted is
On Dec 3, 2009, at 12:07, Abdul Mateen wrote:
Yes, I think I should start by developing on Qt for Maemo 5 and onwards, I am
also curious about distribution of applications, like Android has Android
Market maemo has Maemo Select but I saw one can not push paid apps into
Maemo Select. Any
On Dec 3, 2009, at 15:31, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 13:31 +0100, Jeremiah Foster wrote:
[snip]
Maemo is based on debian which is a Free Software GNU / Linux distribution,
so many of the libraries use LGPL or the GPL. This may have a bearing on
your apps, so it often
Hi,
Do any Maemo superstars want to post to Stackoverflow? There are some
Maemo related questions there and they are not necessarily being answered by
those who have the most knowledge in our community.
I know that we can be pretty hermetic at times, sticking to our forums
and
On Nov 28, 2009, at 16:00, Teemu Ikonen wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 3:02 PM, David Greaves da...@dgreaves.com wrote:
Do you have a URL for the .dsc and tarball
You can check out the sources by doing
git clone git://gitorious.org/maemo-pkg/debhelper.git
But, as said, the build fails.
On Nov 27, 2009, at 11:15, Quim Gil wrote:
Hi,
ext Jeremiah Foster wrote:
I am hesitant here, some of the testing process may require source
packages, either now or in the future. I am not certain that non-free
packages deserve to get all the free quality assurance that the
community
On Nov 25, 2009, at 11:49, tero.k...@nokia.com tero.k...@nokia.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: maemo-developers-boun...@maemo.org [mailto:maemo-developers-
boun...@maemo.org] On Behalf Of Gil Quim (Nokia-D/Helsinki)
Sent: 25 November, 2009 11:48
To: maemo developers
Cc:
We have had an ad-hoc solution which basically is that Niels takes care of
non-free.
Yet there are several non-free packages in extras-devel extras-
testing
/ Extras. Can someone please update the wiki information reflecting the
current practice for Maemo 5?
I will try and make it
On Nov 25, 2009, at 15:11, Valerio Valerio wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Dave Neary dne...@maemo.org wrote:
Hi,
I know I'm not the only one confused here...
Quim says:
We are seeing more questions about this and actually the
current information is misleading since it
On 11/25/09 4:07 PM, Andrew Flegg wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 14:55, David Greavesda...@dgreaves.com wrote:
Does the community really have so much spare resource that we can QA
non-free (and presumably non-community) apps?
fms/RST38h's emulators are non-free. However much I'd
On Nov 18, 2009, at 9:19, ibrahim wrote:
Didn't work either. Maybe there is something wrong with the way i create
packages:
There isn't really a wrong or right way, just a way that works for you and
allows the package to be installed according to policy. That said, there are
some 'best
Hi Mohamed,
On Nov 16, 2009, at 11:26, mohamed ismael wrote:
It is customary to post your comments directly underneath the comments that
were sent to you. This way we can 'weave' together a conversation that everyone
can follow. :)
i added the following line in my code
#include libprofile.h
On Nov 15, 2009, at 9:10, mohamed ismael wrote:
i added the following line in my code
#include libprofile.h
and i get the error
no such file or directory
Is this the exact error message? If it isn't, could you paste the exact error
message in your mail?
i am using esbox IDE and
i
On Nov 12, 2009, at 6:15, Quim Gil wrote:
Hi,
ext Edward Page wrote:
Which reminds me, any reason Maemo doesn't use Debian's popularity contest?
At least at a community level there is
https://garage.maemo.org/projects/popcon/
Bas (the founder of that project) and I have been discussing
On Nov 12, 2009, at 9:17, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
Edward Page wrote:
To help remind people that there is a checklist and whats on it,
should the rating page link to or include the criteria?
Yes - that makes sense.
I see there were no notes on the algorithm. A threshold of 10 was
On Nov 12, 2009, at 4:50, Graham Cobb wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 04:29:55PM +0200, Marius Vollmer wrote:
ext Thomas Perl th.p...@gmail.com writes:
The following is a rant about XB-Maemo-Upgrade-Description
with some suggestions for improvement...
Yeah, as soon as I 'invented' it, I
1 - 100 of 250 matches
Mail list logo
