On Thursday 22 July 2010 02:35:47 Ian Stirling wrote:
Note that since not long ago we also have super-testers, people with
proven track records, it's enough to get three of their votes if your
package is stuck and you're good to go.
Where is the super-testers list?
I've tested a few apps
Servus!
2010/7/21 Roman Morawek li...@morawek.at:
[...] Actually, I think in the early lifetime of a SW project there
will probably be a release every few months, which could permanently
block the tool's promotion to extras.
If there are enough users / testers, releasing every month is no
2010/7/22 Ville M. Vainio vivai...@gmail.com:
How about a system where developers could convince other developers to
test drive their application by voting on theirs? I.e. being able to
give a conditional vote that is realized only after the receiver
votes up/down on your application?
Hi all,
do you think that the possibility to vote (UP/DOWN) applications and
send feedback directly from N900 could help the process? It's just an
idea eh...
Another feature I'd like to see on Application Manager is the
possibility to know if an application I see comes from maemo-extras,
On Thursday 22 July 2010 00:19:20 Felipe Crochik wrote:
I added a message to the download assistant thread but never received a
reply. http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p=717824postcount=17
Maybe someone knows the maintainer or what is behind the scenes and can
find out if it is a viable
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Thomas Perl th.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Wouldn't this slow down the whole process even more? Instead of
getting one vote right away, you have to wait for the return vote to
be completed, and only then the vote gets counted. A download
People could still give
Hi,
Personnaly i didn't care anymore about extras.
If people need to use my apps i just ask them to use my repository. No
QA Hassle ... :)
And if someone want to package it to maemo extras repo he can ... but
in three month this didn't happen.
Best regards,
2010/7/21 Roman Morawek
Hello,
I like to share my thoughts on the QA strategy of Maemo.
I am the owner of an N900 program and promoted my package to
extras-testing ca. 2 months ago. Right now there are only 2 votes on it.
I wonder how many more months it will take until 10 persons vote for it
such that I can promote it
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Roman Morawek li...@morawek.at wrote:
I am the owner of an N900 program and promoted my package to
extras-testing ca. 2 months ago. Right now there are only 2 votes on it.
I wonder how many more months it will take until 10 persons vote for it
such that I can
Hi,
On 21 July 2010 22:53, Roman Morawek li...@morawek.at wrote:
Hello,
I like to share my thoughts on the QA strategy of Maemo.
I am the owner of an N900 program and promoted my package to
extras-testing ca. 2 months ago. Right now there are only 2 votes on it.
I wonder how many more
On Wednesday 21 July 2010 22:53:43 Roman Morawek wrote:
P.S.: You are welcome to evaluate and vote on my package:
Indeed, the best strategy for developers is to lobby a bit for their
application. Open a thread on talk.maemo.org . Blog about it. Write to the
list. I hope the fellow devs won't
-
From: maemo-developers-boun...@maemo.org
[mailto:maemo-developers-boun...@maemo.org] On Behalf Of Attila Csipa
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 5:56 PM
To: maemo-developers@maemo.org
Subject: Re: Maemo QA process
On Wednesday 21 July 2010 22:53:43 Roman Morawek wrote:
P.S.: You are welcome to evaluate
...@maemo.org
[mailto:maemo-developers-boun...@maemo.org] On Behalf Of Attila Csipa
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 5:56 PM
To: maemo-developers@maemo.org
Subject: Re: Maemo QA process
On Wednesday 21 July 2010 22:53:43 Roman Morawek wrote:
P.S.: You are welcome to evaluate and vote on my package:
Indeed
13 matches
Mail list logo
