Hi, All,
I'd like to upload Woodchuck to extras. Woodchuck is stable and
usable and I think that it offers great value to users of mobile
devices. Since my favorite programs are now Woodchuck-enabled, I've
observed a change in my behavior. Because, gPodder, FeedingIt and
Khwetteur
For the packahes which aren't in Section: user/... they will be promoted
automatically as dependencies of things which relu on them.
I haven't checked your packages yet, but that should reduce the review burden.
Hope that helps,
Andrew
--
Andrew Flegg | mailto:and...@bleb.org --
Hi, Andrew,
At Sat, 5 Nov 2011 13:00:20 +,
and...@bleb.org wrote:
For the packahes which aren't in Section: user/... they will be
promoted automatically as dependencies of things which relu on them.
I wasn't aware of that, thanks! That means there are only three
packages that need review:
Hi Neal,
Why not announce Woodchuck on Talk Maemo.org (section Applications) ?
Hundreds of users will know about it.
Best regards,
Roberto
Em 05-11-2011 10:50, Neal H. Walfield escreveu:
Hi, All,
I'd like to upload Woodchuck to extras. Woodchuck is stable and
Thanks for the suggestion. I prefer reading mailing lists and blogs
and I assume everyone is like me :-). I've created a thread on TMO:
http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=79707
Neal
At Sat, 05 Nov 2011 12:33:06 -0200,
Roberto Colistete Jr. wrote:
Hi Neal,
Why not
Excellent. I replied to your first post asking you to list the
extras-testing links so that users can vote to promote the packages.
Ah confirm that only the user/... section packages need voting
from extras-testing to extras. The other ones which are dependencies are
then promoted.
