Woodchuck package review
Hi, All, I'd like to upload Woodchuck to extras. Woodchuck is stable and usable and I think that it offers great value to users of mobile devices. Since my favorite programs are now Woodchuck-enabled, I've observed a change in my behavior. Because, gPodder, FeedingIt and Khwetteur automatically download content, I rely a lot less on my cellular provider, and, since the data I want is already there, the content is more quickly available and poor cellular coverage rarely bothers me. To get Woodchuck into extras, I need 6 people to review the packages. Here are the links to the packages: http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/murmeltier/0.4~2002-7/ http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/pywoodchuck/0.4~2002-7/ http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/apt-woodchuck/0.4~2002-7/ http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/smart-storage-logger/0.4~2002-7/ http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/libgwoodchuck/0.4~2002-7/ Thanks for your help! Neal ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Woodchuck package review
For the packahes which aren't in Section: user/... they will be promoted automatically as dependencies of things which relu on them. I haven't checked your packages yet, but that should reduce the review burden. Hope that helps, Andrew -- Andrew Flegg | mailto:and...@bleb.org -- http://www.bleb.org/On 05/11/2011 12:50 Neal H. Walfield wrote: Hi, All, I'd like to upload Woodchuck to extras. Woodchuck is stable and usable and I think that it offers great value to users of mobile devices. Since my favorite programs are now Woodchuck-enabled, I've observed a change in my behavior. Because, gPodder, FeedingIt and Khwetteur automatically download content, I rely a lot less on my cellular provider, and, since the data I want is already there, the content is more quickly available and poor cellular coverage rarely bothers me. To get Woodchuck into extras, I need 6 people to review the packages. Here are the links to the packages: http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/murmeltier/0.4~2002-7/ http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/pywoodchuck/0.4~2002-7/ http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/apt-woodchuck/0.4~2002-7/ http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/smart-storage-logger/0.4~2002-7/ http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/libgwoodchuck/0.4~2002-7/ Thanks for your help! Neal ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Woodchuck package review
Hi, Andrew, At Sat, 5 Nov 2011 13:00:20 +, and...@bleb.org wrote: For the packahes which aren't in Section: user/... they will be promoted automatically as dependencies of things which relu on them. I wasn't aware of that, thanks! That means there are only three packages that need review: http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/murmeltier/0.4~2002-7/ http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/apt-woodchuck/0.4~2002-7/ http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/smart-storage-logger/0.4~2002-7/ Thanks, Neal ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Woodchuck package review
Hi Neal, Why not announce Woodchuck on Talk Maemo.org (section Applications) ? Hundreds of users will know about it. Best regards, Roberto Em 05-11-2011 10:50, Neal H. Walfield escreveu: Hi, All, I'd like to upload Woodchuck to extras. Woodchuck is stable and usable and I think that it offers great value to users of mobile devices. Since my favorite programs are now Woodchuck-enabled, I've observed a change in my behavior. Because, gPodder, FeedingIt and Khwetteur automatically download content, I rely a lot less on my cellular provider, and, since the data I want is already there, the content is more quickly available and poor cellular coverage rarely bothers me. To get Woodchuck into extras, I need 6 people to review the packages. Here are the links to the packages: http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/murmeltier/0.4~2002-7/ http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/pywoodchuck/0.4~2002-7/ http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/apt-woodchuck/0.4~2002-7/ http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/smart-storage-logger/0.4~2002-7/ http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/libgwoodchuck/0.4~2002-7/ Thanks for your help! Neal ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Woodchuck package review
Thanks for the suggestion. I prefer reading mailing lists and blogs and I assume everyone is like me :-). I've created a thread on TMO: http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=79707 Neal At Sat, 05 Nov 2011 12:33:06 -0200, Roberto Colistete Jr. wrote: Hi Neal, Why not announce Woodchuck on Talk Maemo.org (section Applications) ? Hundreds of users will know about it. Best regards, Roberto Em 05-11-2011 10:50, Neal H. Walfield escreveu: Hi, All, I'd like to upload Woodchuck to extras. Woodchuck is stable and usable and I think that it offers great value to users of mobile devices. Since my favorite programs are now Woodchuck-enabled, I've observed a change in my behavior. Because, gPodder, FeedingIt and Khwetteur automatically download content, I rely a lot less on my cellular provider, and, since the data I want is already there, the content is more quickly available and poor cellular coverage rarely bothers me. To get Woodchuck into extras, I need 6 people to review the packages. Here are the links to the packages: http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/murmeltier/0.4~2002-7/ http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/pywoodchuck/0.4~2002-7/ http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/apt-woodchuck/0.4~2002-7/ http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/smart-storage-logger/0.4~2002-7/ http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/libgwoodchuck/0.4~2002-7/ Thanks for your help! Neal ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
Re: Woodchuck package review
Excellent. I replied to your first post asking you to list the extras-testing links so that users can vote to promote the packages. Ah confirm that only the user/... section packages need voting from extras-testing to extras. The other ones which are dependencies are then promoted. Em 05-11-2011 13:06, Neal H. Walfield escreveu: Thanks for the suggestion. I prefer reading mailing lists and blogs and I assume everyone is like me :-). I've created a thread on TMO: http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=79707 Neal At Sat, 05 Nov 2011 12:33:06 -0200, Roberto Colistete Jr. wrote: Hi Neal, Why not announce Woodchuck on Talk Maemo.org (section Applications) ? Hundreds of users will know about it. Best regards, Roberto Em 05-11-2011 10:50, Neal H. Walfield escreveu: Hi, All, I'd like to upload Woodchuck to extras. Woodchuck is stable and usable and I think that it offers great value to users of mobile devices. Since my favorite programs are now Woodchuck-enabled, I've observed a change in my behavior. Because, gPodder, FeedingIt and Khwetteur automatically download content, I rely a lot less on my cellular provider, and, since the data I want is already there, the content is more quickly available and poor cellular coverage rarely bothers me. To get Woodchuck into extras, I need 6 people to review the packages. Here are the links to the packages: http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/murmeltier/0.4~2002-7/ http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/pywoodchuck/0.4~2002-7/ http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/apt-woodchuck/0.4~2002-7/ http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/smart-storage-logger/0.4~2002-7/ http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/libgwoodchuck/0.4~2002-7/ Thanks for your help! Neal ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
