Hi
What do you think about switching from defaulting to installing on raw
partitions to lvm
installing on LVs like fedora does ?
It does help brings more flexibility.
See you
On 20 February 2011 04:47, Thierry Vignaud thierry.vign...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 February 2011 17:25, r...@mageia.org wrote:
Revision584AuthorahmadDate2011-02-20 02:25:37 +0100 (Sun, 20 Feb 2011)
Log Message
- update the version in the Makefile
Please update NEWS at well...
We used to
What do you think about switching from defaulting to installing on raw
partitions to lvm
Personally i don't like lvm i prefer installing it when needed.
iirc it's not easy to mount lvm partiotions when a dd images
has been performed, but i maybe wrong...
installing on LVs like fedora does ?
i
On Sunday, 20 February 2011 17:51:27 Thierry Vignaud wrote:
Hi
What do you think about switching from defaulting to installing on raw
partitions to lvm
installing on LVs like fedora does ?
It does help brings more flexibility.
Sure, but it can still introduce boot problems after kernel
Michael Scherer skrev 18.2.2011 15:42:
Le vendredi 18 février 2011 à 12:47 +, James Kerr a écrit :
If there are two packages, one in core and another in tainted, then
doesn't urpmi need a way to recognise that the tainted package is newer
than (an update to) the corresponding core package?
Well, the old simple logic works...
lets say we abuse the release tag, for example changing mga to mgt
then if the user enables tainted (meaning he/she wants the rpms) urpmi
will automatically get the mgt ones, no questions asked...
simple, and effective.
and since the rebuild should be
Le samedi 19 février 2011 21:18:48 Remy CLOUARD, vous avez écrit :
Hi there,
As the title says so, this mail is intended to all people who would like
to become a packager, but who don’t know where to look, what’s the path,
what to do.
As you may or may not know, mentoring started a few
Hi,
Now and then, i'm refreshing http://pkgsubmit.mageia.org/ and sometimes i
notice the missing dependancies increasing...
As such, i have no big problem with this, except that i would like this to be
solved one way or the other when we release final.
however, when i looked at them, i
Le dimanche 20 février 2011 20:23:30, Maarten Vanraes a écrit :
Hi,
Now and then, i'm refreshing http://pkgsubmit.mageia.org/ and sometimes i
notice the missing dependancies increasing...
[...]
Maybe we should in fact check dependencies directly from the spec fix
requires before uploading
-Original Message-
From: Pierre Chaland pierre.chal...@tsf47.net
Sent: Feb 20, 2011 4:49 PM
To: Mageia development mailing-list mageia-dev@mageia.org
Subject: Re: [Mageia-dev] So, you want to become a mageia packager
Le samedi 19 février 2011 21:18:48 Remy CLOUARD, vous avez écrit :
Hi.
This is just a reminder, when attaching a text log to a bug report in
bugzilla, make sure to set the content type to text/plain, leaving
it as auto-detect doesn't work (this is an old bug, the same issue
happened in mdv bugzilla).
Thanks.
--
Ahmad Samir
On 20 February 2011 21:50, r...@mageia.org wrote:
Revision 599 Author pterjan Date 2011-02-20 21:50:18 +0100 (Sun, 20 Feb
2011)
Log Message
Only check deps for packages buildable on x86_64
Why not try the same logic and i586, then fail (which is fine
since for now we only care about those
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 20:52:08 -0300, Balcaen John wrote:
Le dimanche 20 février 2011 20:23:30, Maarten Vanraes a écrit :
Hi,
Now and then, i'm refreshing http://pkgsubmit.mageia.org/ and
sometimes i
notice the missing dependancies increasing...
[...]
Maybe we should in fact check
On Sunday 20 February 2011, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
Hi
What do you think about switching from defaulting to installing on raw
partitions to lvm
installing on LVs like fedora does ?
I vote against that. (=to be enabled by default)
LVM is fine for enterprise setups, or better, installations
14 matches
Mail list logo