On 26.02.2011 07:35, andre999 wrote:
Maarten Vanraes a écrit :
Op donderdag 24 februari 2011 16:08:51 schreef Anne nicolas:
2011/2/24 Thierry Vignaudthierry.vign...@gmail.com:
On 24 February 2011 07:13, andre999and...@laposte.net wrote:
And if you discussed the issue and your POV wasn't
Anssi Hannula a écrit :
On 26.02.2011 07:35, andre999 wrote:
...
actually, any of those suggestions would be an improvement ;)
I did suggest contrained.
Ubuntu uses restricted and/or multiverse (which include mostly
non-free packages), and there were a lot of other suggestions.
There was only
On 26.02.2011 22:20, andre999 wrote:
Anssi Hannula a écrit :
On 26.02.2011 07:35, andre999 wrote:
...
actually, any of those suggestions would be an improvement ;)
I did suggest contrained.
Ubuntu uses restricted and/or multiverse (which include mostly
non-free packages), and there were a
Op donderdag 24 februari 2011 16:08:51 schreef Anne nicolas:
2011/2/24 Thierry Vignaud thierry.vign...@gmail.com:
On 24 February 2011 07:13, andre999 and...@laposte.net wrote:
And if you discussed the issue and your POV wasn't adapted, what's the
point re-emerging it now given that changing
Maarten Vanraes a écrit :
Op donderdag 24 februari 2011 16:08:51 schreef Anne nicolas:
2011/2/24 Thierry Vignaudthierry.vign...@gmail.com:
On 24 February 2011 07:13, andre999and...@laposte.net wrote:
And if you discussed the issue and your POV wasn't adapted, what's the
point re-emerging it
On 24 February 2011 07:13, andre999 and...@laposte.net wrote:
And if you discussed the issue and your POV wasn't adapted, what's the
point re-emerging it now given that changing the new isn't easy now
that the infra- is already in place.
In 4+ months, a lot will be changed/corrected.
In my
2011/2/24 Thierry Vignaud thierry.vign...@gmail.com:
On 24 February 2011 07:13, andre999 and...@laposte.net wrote:
And if you discussed the issue and your POV wasn't adapted, what's the
point re-emerging it now given that changing the new isn't easy now
that the infra- is already in place.
Quote: Thomas Backlund wrote on Sun, 20 February 2011 19:48
It is an abuse yes,
but the great thing about it is we _know_ it works...
so no surprises...
(if it aint broken...)
Agreed, the automatic preference of urpmi for plf when plf
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:57, Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org wrote:
Le vendredi 18 février 2011 à 10:13 +0100, Philippe DIDIER a écrit :
Just seen that mikala added panotools in the repository . (some
algorythms library to build panoramic photographs)
Very happy with this ! (thanks a lot...)
Quote: rdalverny wrote on Tue, 22 February 2011 11:04
Long time ago,
How long is a long time ago? because every patent has a term and
here it may have expired.
Long time ago means 1999..
Actually the problem has not expired : Bruno
Maarten Vanraes a écrit :
Op vrijdag 18 februari 2011 14:42:02 schreef Michael Scherer:
Le vendredi 18 février 2011 à 12:47 +, James Kerr a écrit :
If there are two packages, one in core and another in tainted, then
doesn't urpmi need a way to recognise that the tainted package is newer
On Tuesday, 22 February 2011 20:09:17 andre999 wrote:
Maarten Vanraes a écrit :
Op vrijdag 18 februari 2011 14:42:02 schreef Michael Scherer:
Le vendredi 18 février 2011 à 12:47 +, James Kerr a écrit :
If there are two packages, one in core and another in tainted, then
doesn't urpmi
On 22 February 2011 20:09, andre999 and...@laposte.net wrote:
aside
First of all, tainted in English implies that the software doesn't work.
(Unless it refers to food, in which case it means poisonous.)
So we should choose a more appropriate name, such as constrained, or use
the Ubuntu
Op dinsdag 22 februari 2011 19:09:17 schreef andre999:
[...]
aside
First of all, tainted in English implies that the software doesn't
work. (Unless it refers to food, in which case it means poisonous.)
So we should choose a more appropriate name, such as constrained, or
use the Ubuntu
Michael Scherer skrev 18.2.2011 15:42:
Le vendredi 18 février 2011 à 12:47 +, James Kerr a écrit :
If there are two packages, one in core and another in tainted, then
doesn't urpmi need a way to recognise that the tainted package is newer
than (an update to) the corresponding core package?
Well, the old simple logic works...
lets say we abuse the release tag, for example changing mga to mgt
then if the user enables tainted (meaning he/she wants the rpms) urpmi
will automatically get the mgt ones, no questions asked...
simple, and effective.
and since the rebuild should be
On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 09:20:50 +0100, Maarten Vanraes wrote:
Op vrijdag 18 februari 2011 14:42:02 schreef Michael Scherer:
Le vendredi 18 février 2011 à 12:47 +, James Kerr a écrit :
If there are two packages, one in core and another in tainted,
then
doesn't urpmi need a way to recognise
Op zaterdag 19 februari 2011 14:59:46 schreef Michael Scherer:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 09:20:50 +0100, Maarten Vanraes wrote:
Op vrijdag 18 februari 2011 14:42:02 schreef Michael Scherer:
Le vendredi 18 février 2011 à 12:47 +, James Kerr a écrit :
If there are two packages, one in core
This sound like w32codecs issues. I suggest create a nonfree repository or don't
install it if user choose a non-European country during install.
2011/2/18 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org:
Le vendredi 18 février 2011 à 12:47 +, James Kerr a écrit :
If there are two packages, one in core and another in tainted, then
doesn't urpmi need a way to recognise that the tainted package is newer
than (an update to) the corresponding core
Le vendredi 18 février 2011 à 10:13 +0100, Philippe DIDIER a écrit :
Hi everybody !
Just seen that mikala added panotools in the repository . (some
algorythms library to build panoramic photographs)
Very happy with this ! (thanks a lot...)
That's one of the first patent problems we may
Philippe DIDIER philippedid...@laposte.net schrieb am 2011-02-18
But this doesn't solve the more global problem of rpms with patent
problems (how to have them clearly built and identified : need
different suffixes ?)
Wasn't this the reason for creating the tainted repository? Since we
don't
Philippe DIDIER philippedid...@laposte.net schrieb am 2011-02-18
And what I talked about (in the other thread with the same name)
was about the easiness to build and use different rpms with the
same spec having mdv versus plf suffixes...
And about it seems that we need to have different naming
Le vendredi 18 février 2011 à 12:43 +0100, Oliver Burger a écrit :
Philippe DIDIER philippedid...@laposte.net schrieb am 2011-02-18
And what I talked about (in the other thread with the same name)
was about the easiness to build and use different rpms with the
same spec having mdv versus
Le vendredi 18 février 2011 06:13:07, Philippe DIDIER a écrit :
Hi everybody !
Just seen that mikala added panotools in the repository . (some
algorythms library to build panoramic photographs)
Very happy with this ! (thanks a lot...)
That's one of the first patent problems we may encounter
On 18/02/11 12:07, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le vendredi 18 février 2011 à 12:43 +0100, Oliver Burger a écrit :
Philippe DIDIERphilippedid...@laposte.net schrieb am 2011-02-18
And what I talked about (in the other thread with the same name)
was about the easiness to build and use different rpms
26 matches
Mail list logo
