Re: [Mailman-Users] Backup / Recover of Lists or mailman application.

2004-04-28 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Ruben Franco wrote on Tue, 27 Apr 2004 16:05:16 -0600: So does the lists sub-directory contain data for each individual list including rosters and digests? you mean archives? They are in the archives directory. Just have a look at your mailman directory. It's all quite clean and neatly

removing arbitrary headers [Mailman-Developers] [Mailman-Users]

2004-04-28 Thread James Ralston
On 2004-04-04 at 11:01:22-07 Chuq Von Rospach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I definitely see it as useful to be able to strip out headers that cause systems to auto-reply with a return receipt. IMHO, this statement can be shortened to I definitely think it would be useful to strip out arbitrary

[Mailman-Users] Reset All Users Disabled By Bouncing?

2004-04-28 Thread Hunter Hillegas
Is there a way to reset all users that are set to nomail[B] to re-enable delivery? We recently had a situation where AOL was blocking all of our mail, so everyone on our list that is on AOL is now blocked for excessive bouncing... We have 20,000 members on our list on AOL, so doing it by hand

[Mailman-Users] Using a hostname other than the server's primary name...

2004-04-28 Thread Roedel, Mark
Brief Overview: === The box that currently hosts our Mailman lists has several different hostnames, some of which (including its primary) are only resolvable from inside our firewall. While Mailman is configured to prefer a non-primary hostname, generated emails include the primary

[Mailman-Users] How to list all members of a list/search broken

2004-04-28 Thread Kai Schaetzl
There doesn't seem to be an option for listing all members on the web interface and there's also no chance to do it with the search. Search obviously transforms strings automatically to regexes (that is I can search for a string and don't need to create a regex), but it doesn't produce a

Re: [Mailman-Users] How to list all members of a list/search broken

2004-04-28 Thread Todd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kai Schaetzl wrote: There doesn't seem to be an option for listing all members on the web interface and there's also no chance to do it with the search. There is, but it's not in the obvious place that list admins would look for it. Check the

Re: [Mailman-Users] Reset All Users Disabled By Bouncing?

2004-04-28 Thread David Relson
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 09:14:38 -0700 Hunter Hillegas wrote: Is there a way to reset all users that are set to nomail[B] to re-enable delivery? We recently had a situation where AOL was blocking all of our mail, so everyone on our list that is on AOL is now blocked for excessive bouncing...

RE: [Mailman-Users] Reset All Users Disabled By Bouncing?

2004-04-28 Thread Roedel, Mark
Even better: $prefix/list_members --nomail=B would give a list of only those list members with the criteria requested by the original poster. (Exists in 2.1.5rc2...not sure if it was around prior to that or not.) -- Mark Roedel Web Programmer / Analyst LeTourneau University

Re: [Mailman-Users] Using a hostname other than the server's primary name...

2004-04-28 Thread Steffen Mueller
On 04/28/04 18:45 Roedel, Mark wrote: Brief Overview: === The box that currently hosts our Mailman lists has several different hostnames, some of which (including its primary) are only resolvable from inside our firewall. While Mailman is configured to prefer a non-primary hostname,

Re: [Mailman-Users] Using a hostname other than the server's primary name...

2004-04-28 Thread Brad Knowles
At 11:45 AM -0500 2004/04/28, Roedel, Mark wrote: The box that currently hosts our Mailman lists has several different hostnames, some of which (including its primary) are only resolvable from inside our firewall. [ ... deletia ... ] Is it possible to override this behavior? Yes, but it

Re: [Mailman-Users] Reset All Users Disabled By Bouncing?

2004-04-28 Thread John DeCarlo
Hello, David Relson wrote: On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 09:14:38 -0700 Hunter Hillegas wrote: Is there a way to reset all users that are set to nomail[B] to re-enable delivery? Perhaps the following idea will be helpful: $prefix/list_members can give a list of members grep can select the aol subscribers

[Mailman-Users] No welcome mail

2004-04-28 Thread Kai Schaetzl
I usually subscribe members to our announce-only lists via web interface and don't send them a welcome notice. But today I did and found that nothing gets sent. Unsubscription sends an unsubscribe confirmation to the member and I also get my list-admin notice when I tick it. But no welcome

RE: [Mailman-Users] Using a hostname other than the server's primaryname... (additional information)

2004-04-28 Thread Roedel, Mark
Thanks for the responses...hopefully I'll be able to massage them into something useful. I was skeptical that the problem pointed to an MTA configuration issue, because I got the same set of headers when I changed SMTPHOST in my mm_cfg.py from 'localhost' to point to another of our SMTP servers.

Re: [Mailman-Users] Using a hostname other than the server's primaryname... (additional information)

2004-04-28 Thread Steve Williams
Hi, I am very new to Mailman and ran into the same problem. I resolved it by doing my configure with: ./configure --with-mailhost=maillisthost.com --with-urlhost=www.maillisthost.com then make, make install, and it resolved the problem! Good Luck.. Cheers, Steve Roedel, Mark wrote:

[Mailman-Users] MM Not Talking To Imap Sessions: Pop3d OK

2004-04-28 Thread Karl R. Balsmeier
Hi there, I noticed that users utilizing squirrelmail and some other Imap based programs were not able to submit posts to the list. Is there an Exim3 transport or Director or trasport that handles this? -krb -- Mailman-Users mailing list

Re: [Mailman-Users] Reset All Users Disabled By Bouncing?

2004-04-28 Thread Hunter Hillegas
This works like a charm... Question now is if there is something I can feed this list into to re-enable them... Does anyone know? Thanks, Hunter From: Roedel, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 14:34:32 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Mailman-Users] Reset All Users

Re: [Mailman-Users] Access subscription list via PHP?

2004-04-28 Thread Sean Robertson
Looks like the host is keeping mailman on a seperate server. Is there any way to still do it, or am I stuck? What I'm doing right now is generating an email in PHP using the subscribers address for the from line, so that the confirmation goes to them. Is there any way I can do this using some

Re: [Mailman-Users] Reset All Users Disabled By Bouncing?

2004-04-28 Thread Hunter Hillegas
Replying to my own post... Seems easiest thing to do was remove/re-add the users. Cheers, Hunter From: Hunter Hillegas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 14:01:15 -0700 To: Roedel, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mailman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Reset All Users Disabled

[Mailman-Users] Footer Appended as Attachment in 2.1?

2004-04-28 Thread Hunter Hillegas
We're seeing the footer coming along as an attachment on some end-users systems. I saw a FAQ entry for this behavior with 2.0.x. We're running 2.1.4 and the FAQ article specifies that it is fixed in 2.1.x. Anyone know what is going on? Thanks, Hunter

[Mailman-Users] Re: How does Mailman compare with YahooGroups?

2004-04-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Prodos (Melbourne, Australia) To: Glenn Sieb Dear Glenn, Good morning! If you look at what people _use_ Yahoogroups for, it's not just for a mailing list in general--it's being used to schedule get togethers, keep track of members' birthdays, et cetera. Mailman doesn't do all that (at

Re: [Mailman-Users] Reset All Users Disabled By Bouncing?

2004-04-28 Thread Jim Tittsler
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 09:14:38AM -0700, Hunter Hillegas wrote: Is there a way to reset all users that are set to nomail[B] to re-enable delivery? This is the sort of thing that 'withlist' is good for. We have 20,000 members on our list on AOL, so doing it by hand sounds about as great as

[Mailman-Users] What about this patch: Edit held message header/body?

2004-04-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Prodos (Melbourne, Australia) Good afternoon! I'd like to ask whether anyone is using or is familar with the following patch and if you have any feedback about it: [ 644129 ] Edit held message header/body available @