Re: [Mailman-Users] non-subscribers getting through--email address in "Real Name"

On 07/20/2018 08:12 AM, Grant Taylor via Mailman-Users wrote: > > Have you tried using the alternate milters?  Postfix implemented > Sendmail's milter protocol.  So I think they are directly compatible > with each other. Neither nor

Re: [Mailman-Users] non-subscribers getting through--email address in "Real Name"

On 07/20/2018 12:40 AM, Jayson Smith wrote: Could either of these milter solutions linked previously be adapted for use as a Sendmail milter? I'd love to find something which would query Mailman about the status of a particular sender address at the RCPT stage of the SMTP transaction so

Re: [Mailman-Users] non-subscribers getting through--email address in "Real Name"

Mark Sapiro writes: > The problem is downstream has to trust me. If I'm gmail.com, I'll > probably be trusted. If I'm msapiro.net, probably not. Python.org, who > knows. The problem is the same butt-lazy admins that caused you to implement DKIM-stripping.[1] Google and (AFAIK) Yahoo! and

Re: [Mailman-Users] non-subscribers getting through--email address in "Real Name"

Hi, Both of these approaches seem to be specific to Postfix if I'm not mistaken. There's a similar milter for Sendmail called Mailman-Milter which I was using for a while. However, it worked based on Mailman's action E.G. it would use a Python script to determine what Mailman would do with a