Re: [Mailman-Users] how to arrange a list with 'affiliate' members

2004-05-14 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Barnaby == Barnaby Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Barnaby However you seriously underestimate the technophobia of Barnaby my members! Perhaps. I still think if they were given a chance to work with a system that was crafted to work for them, instead of against them, they would learn

Re: [Mailman-Users] how to arrange a list with 'affiliate' members

2004-05-11 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Barnaby == Barnaby Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Barnaby I am trying to configure a list or group of lists to Barnaby exhibit the following behaviour, but have been having Barnaby trouble: Barnaby I run a list called 'discuss', which is a discussion list Barnaby for

Re: [Mailman-Users] how to arrange a list with 'affiliate' members

2004-05-11 Thread Barnaby Scott
Thanks for your reply. This was a solution I considered, but as you point out, members of one list do not have an automatic right to post to a 'sub-list'. As the moderator, I really do not want the job of subscribing/unsubscribing people to the extra list. As for the Reply-To munging, you make

[Mailman-Users] how to arrange a list with 'affiliate' members

2004-05-08 Thread Barnaby Scott
I am trying to configure a list or group of lists to exhibit the following behaviour, but have been having trouble: I run a list called 'discuss', which is a discussion list for members of our organisation. We would also like to invite a handful of people to be 'affiliate' members, but who would