31-Jan-03 at 00:40, Barry A. Warsaw ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
WY == Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
WY If you have an old cookie from Mailman 2.0.x, you'll have to
WY re-login for every page until you manually clear the cookie
WY from your browser (after upgrading to
30-Jan-03 at 18:23, Will Yardley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 09:14:05AM +, Simon White wrote:
29-Jan-03 at 13:37, Will Yardley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Is there any way to fix this in the future? With some browsers, it's not
simple to remove an individual
I was going to add this FAQ entry, but I realize that I don't have a
password to do that and I have to leave for a meeting right now.
If someone wants to add this, feel free to do it. I just discovered
this issue this morning, when I noticed that some of my lists took a
long time to deliver mail.
Hi,
I am Cc-ing this reply to the list.
You can always change your preferred charset by adding following
lines in your mm_cfg.py.
LC_DESCRIPTIONS['en'] = (_('English (USA)'), 'iso-8859-1')
This is useful if your list's main language is English but
majority of users are from Latin-1 countries.
Howdie,
Is there a way to get mailman to deliver messages to the same
domain in one smtp connection.
Example
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] will all be delivered in the same smtp connection.
At the moment it is connecting,
I recently re-installed my Linux Mandrake 8.2 server, I had located some
data corruption in the OS Binaries. Anyway, I've been using Mailman for
quite awhile, the server has been running LM 8.1 and was upgraded to
8.2. Mailman has received several upgrades while in place on the system.
I'm
31-Jan-03 at 14:39, Gareth Hopkins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Is there a way to get mailman to deliver messages to the same
domain in one smtp connection.
Example
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] will all be delivered in the same smtp
SW == Simon White [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SW Kinda tough if you don't have the mailman version in the
SW cookie. A good reason to put it in there, from now on, if it
SW isn't there.
SW Any other parameter in the cookie which has changed could be
SW detected by the new
ST == Samuel Tardieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ST I was going to add this FAQ entry, but I realize that I don't
ST have a password to do that and I have to leave for a meeting
ST right now.
Folks, remember that the FAQwiz is on the honor system. Look at the
front page of the
Folks:
I've got a problem with some of my subscribers that are using the gmane.org
news server to read mailing lists. I run my lists with Mailman 2.1.
These subscribers (myself included) post messages to the list via the news
server, and the messages go out to the regular subscribers, and
Is there a way to mass subscribe users with digest mode as the default?
Thanks,
--
-- Ignacio Valdes,MD,MS Editor: Linux Medical News
http://www.linuxmednews.com
'Revolutionizing Medical Education and Practice'
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
I am using Mailman 2.0.7 and when I send a message to any of my list it
will bounce back on all receipients. The email server is working
perfectly, but for some reason when Mailman sends the message the log
shows that all recpients bounce.
Any help
Brian
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
This
31-Jan-03 at 08:25, Ignacio Valdes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Is there a way to mass subscribe users with digest mode as the default?
Thanks,
Use the add_members script
--digest-members-file=file
-d=file
these people become digest members.
The file is a plain text file with one
En un mensaje anterior, Jon Carnes escribió:
Forgive my lack of exact language. To be more precise, you can turn on
personalization for a list using the Web-Admin. Once you do that certain
other features become available and you can then edit the Footer (using the
Web-Admin) and put in
Forgive me for the simplicity of this suggestion, but if you want to include
the same footer in a given post to all subscribers, couldn't you simply
include the footer at the bottom of your post content?
Sorry if I'm misunderstanding your needs.
--Bobby
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
31-Jan-03 at 12:45, Fernando Schapachnik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
En un mensaje anterior, Jon Carnes escribió:
Forgive my lack of exact language. To be more precise, you can turn on
personalization for a list using the Web-Admin. Once you do that certain
other features become available
En un mensaje anterior, Bobby and Denise escribió:
Forgive me for the simplicity of this suggestion, but if you want to include
the same footer in a given post to all subscribers, couldn't you simply
include the footer at the bottom of your post content?
Sorry if I'm misunderstanding your
En un mensaje anterior, Simon White escribió:
I realize that I gain some extra footer variables if I turn personalization on,
but fail to see how any of them relate to including the output from an external
commands. Think about including the fortune output in the footer, for example.
Put
31-Jan-03 at 18:21, Gareth Hopkins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Simon White wrote:
SW31-Jan-03 at 14:39, Gareth Hopkins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
SW Is there a way to get mailman to deliver messages to the same
SW domain in one smtp connection.
SW
SW Example
SW
SW
If you have the ability to patch your Mailman installation, you could add a
new variable name (like mlist.fortune) to the ALLOWEDS array in
Mailman/Gui/Digest.py and then use the 'withlist' command to set this
variable to a new value every so often, and include it in the msg_footer
field in
31-Jan-03 at 13:45, Fernando Schapachnik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
En un mensaje anterior, Simon White escribió:
I realize that I gain some extra footer variables if I turn personalization on,
but fail to see how any of them relate to including the output from an external
commands.
En un mensaje anterior, Tom Neff escribió:
If you have the ability to patch your Mailman installation, you could add a
new variable name (like mlist.fortune) to the ALLOWEDS array in
Mailman/Gui/Digest.py and then use the 'withlist' command to set this
variable to a new value every so
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 13:46:24 +0100, Marc Haber
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a possibility to allow Mailman 2.1 to immedately forward a
message from a moderator to the list if and only if the correct
moderator password is given in the message? If the message doesn't
have an Approved:
TN == Tom Neff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TN I don't know of any way to do what you want without patching
TN Mailman.
You're right that there currently is no way to do this. The security
implications would have to be worked out, but it might be an
interesting feature -- feel free to
SW == Simon White [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SW You have a point. Mailman is injecting to the MTA so if it
SW does connect/disconnect etc then this will affect even
SW Postfix. So, there does need to be a way to have Mailman open
SW a single connection to the server for each
FS == Fernando Schapachnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FS If I come up with something tidy, I like to contrib it
FS back. What is the standard way to do that?
Use the SourceForge patch manager:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=103atid=300103
and if you want, add it to the
I've read several of the posts about changing the footers. I've made changes
to the footer in the non-digest and digest options, but they do not get
applied. I've also emabled personalization, but did not see any other
options. Is there somewhere else I should look?
Thanks
Mike
Let me start off by saying that I have never personally done an
upgrade from 1.1 straight to 2.1, so that all this as my best guess,
not as gospel.
It may in fact, be better to upgrade from 1.1 to 2.0(.13) and then
from there to 2.1. That's more work of course, and it may be
unnecessary work.
31-Jan-03 at 13:00, Barry A. Warsaw ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
The chunking algorithm for sending messages to the mta is defined by
variables such as SMTP_MAX_SESSIONS_PER_CONNECTION and
SMTP_MAX_RCPTS.
The latter specifies the maximum size of the RCPT TO chunks in each
handoff to the mta.
In Mailman 2.0 there was a setting for the default URL. I can't seem to
find it in 2.1.
I need to change the default URL for all my lists. Any easy way to do this?
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am having problems getting Mailman 2.1 installed on LM 8.2 using the
Stock Python distributions. Here is the Error I am encountering:
/usr/bin/python -S /home/mailman/cron/qrunner
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /home/mailman/cron/qrunner, line 89, in ?
from Mailman.Handlers import
* Brian Barbour ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I am using Mailman 2.0.7 and when I send a message to any of my list it
will bounce back on all receipients. The email server is working
perfectly, but for some reason when Mailman sends the message the log
shows that all recpients bounce.
A little
AEW == Albert E Whale [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AEW I am having problems getting Mailman 2.1 installed on LM 8.2
AEW using the Stock Python distributions. Here is the Error I am
AEW encountering:
AEW ImportError: No module named pythonlib.StringIO
AEW Does this follow
SW == Simon White [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SW Chunking like this means that you're actually sending RCPT TO:
SW based on TLD, and then only US TLDs, right? So SMTP_MAX_RCPTS
SW set to 50 could mean several different second level domains in
SW the same chunk, but for every TLD
ok - what would the command be to change the URL of every list?
Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
MP == Marc Perkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MP In Mailman 2.0 there was a setting for the default URL. I
MP can't seem to find it in 2.1.
It was too dangerous to leave in the web
MP == Marc Perkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MP In Mailman 2.0 there was a setting for the default URL. I
MP can't seem to find it in 2.1.
It was too dangerous to leave in the web interface.
MP I need to change the default URL for all my lists. Any easy
MP way to do this?
Barry A. Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
MP In Mailman 2.0 there was a setting for the default URL. I
MP can't seem to find it in 2.1.
It was too dangerous to leave in the web interface.
What was dangerous about it?
I'm just
31-Jan-03 at 16:09, Vivek Khera ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
BAW == Barry A Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BAW SMTP_MAX_SESSIONS_PER_CONNECTION determines how many chunks it sends
BAW down the same socket connection to the mta. Again, a negative number
BAW means blast all the chunks down
* Jon Carnes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I am amazed and astounded - and even more impressed with Cygwin!
How well does the Exim install work? Does it handle email quickly?
Wish I could tell you, but I've never tried it. It's on my list of things
to do, or play with. To play with it on XP now
31-Jan-03 at 13:45, Fernando Schapachnik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
En un mensaje anterior, Simon White escribió:
I realize that I gain some extra footer variables if I turn personalization on,
but fail to see how any of them relate to including the output from an external
commands.
I just installed Mailman 2.1, and somebody noticed that for
Word file attachments, the attachment link in the archives
showed up as .dot rather than .doc.
When I tested it out, my attachment was just a string of
gibberish characters.
I did some research and found Bug 669081. So I took the
BAW == Barry A Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BAW SMTP_MAX_SESSIONS_PER_CONNECTION determines how many chunks it sends
BAW down the same socket connection to the mta. Again, a negative number
BAW means blast all the chunks down the same connection.
With postfix, this would be ideal. It has
current setup: Mailman 2.1, OS X Server 10.2.3, Postfix 1.1.11
I've followed the instructions in README.POSTFIX for integrating
Postfix with Mailman, and everything seems to be working perfectly.
Anything I need to look out for in upgrading Postfix to 2.0.1? Anything
that needs to be changed
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 07:22:15PM -0600, Dan Phillips wrote:
current setup: Mailman 2.1, OS X Server 10.2.3, Postfix 1.1.11
I've followed the instructions in README.POSTFIX for integrating
Postfix with Mailman, and everything seems to be working perfectly.
Anything I need to look out for
This is pretty much prima facia evidence that you are missing some
Python modules. You can either trace them down, or do what i did -
install python from source.
Good Luck - Jon Carnes
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 08:15, Albert E. Whale, CISSP wrote:
Following up on my previous Email, I (finally)
This is indicative of your mailserver not listening on localhost
(127.0.0.1) which is definitive of Red Hat's default Sendmail install.
Read FAQ 3.14 for help in troubleshooting this problem.
Jon Carnes
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 09:40, Brian Barbour wrote:
I am using Mailman 2.0.7 and when I send
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I was asked by a customer today about the footer links on one of their lists
and whether the links could be made to work with AOL's MUA (if it can be
called an MUA). Any halfway decent MUA (and even MS OE) will allow a user
to click on a
Hey all,
I was creating a testlist via the web-admin thingy, when I got the
following error after hitting the create list submit button. No message
was sent to me about the new list, even though I requested it. I
cross-tested this by using the bin/newlist command, which was successful
(no
* Keith Mastin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[snip]
This seems to be a python permissions problem from the last line of the
output. I'm running postfix on a redhat 7.3 box.
[snip]
RuntimeError: command failed: /usr/sbin/postalias
/web/mlib/data/mailman/data/aliases (status: 1, Operation not
Hi All,
Recently Richard Barrett had posted a response to someone
about partially restricting the list. The regular expression
he had given restricts the members to the domain your.domain.com.
I want to expand this a little. I want to reject all subscription
requests (as well as postings) from
Hey all,
I'm running mailman-2.1 on a redhat 7.3 box with postfix-1.1.7-2,
courier-imap-1.6.2-1.7.3, squirrelmail-1.2.10, php-4.1.2-7.3.6, and
python2-2.2.2-3.7.3
When I send a message to the mailman list from SM, the test of the message
is in an attachment, not in the text area of the
* Keith Mastin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[snip]
When I send a message to the mailman list from SM, the test of the message
is in an attachment, not in the text area of the message.
When I send a message to the list from pine-4.44-7.73.0, the test of the
message shows in the text area of
53 matches
Mail list logo
