strange ELF error

Hi! I am trying to update gnutls3 to current! I did not get anything to build, so I commited nothing yet. Build fails for me on Solaris10 Sparc: CCLD libcmd-systemkey.la copying selected object files to avoid basename conflicts... CC psk.o CCLD psktool ld: fatal: file

Makefile target and extra parameters to $(MAKE)

Hi, I think I understand why I have issues with gnustep-back extra CPPFLAGS, BUILD_ARGS and others. I wrote my own build target this way: build-sourcegs: $(BUILD_ENV) && . $(BUILD_PREFIX)/GNUstep/System/Library/Makefiles/GNUstep.sh && cd $(WORKSRC) && $(MAKE) @$(MAKECOOKIE)

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.2 transition

Hi Dago, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >can I set something different for solaris9? or a value that suits both? I'd like to try there too but it is trying to use a compiler and a target that don't exist. Sure, just use GARCOMPILER_5.9 = SOS12 GARCOMPILER_5.10 = SUS12U4 GARCOMPILER =

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.2 transition

Hi all, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: I suggest to mkdir /home/experimental/openssl mv /home/experimental/openssl so we have a catalog to test these in experimental first before pushing. Just did it, sorry for the delay over the weekend. One immediate test would be OpenSSH I guess? And try

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.2 transition

Hi, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: Sure, if in doubt just ask:-) I can package on 9x, 10s, 10x. However on 9s, I get these: CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibssl1-0-0 += binary-architecture-does-not-match-placement|file=opt/csw/lib/libcrypto.so.1.0.0|arch_id=18|arch_name=sparcv8+

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.2 transition

Hi all, some updates on the OpenSSL 1.0.2 update process. I was able to update and clean up the build process. It now builds on solaris 9, 10, 11 on x86 and sparc. I set for solaris9 pentium_pro as a minimum. I stopped using the "tweaked" targets PATCHFILES +=

Re: Current issues

Hi, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: I fixed freetype and updated harfbuzz and pushed everything and all should be fine now. Also unstable/ has been updated to have the latest pushed packages. Fine! I see that your fix, apart from the update, is: -CONFIGURE_ARGS += --without-harfbuzz

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.2 transition

Hi, I saw the resposne. Dagobert Michelsen wrote: Sure, I just asked :-) https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/2540 I gradually upgraded from j to k, testing and indeed, k seems to work! I can build on all platforms and tests pass on sparc 9, 10 and 11. I have some packaging errors

Re: SF.net SVN: gar:[26210] csw/mgar/pkg/gs_ftp/trunk/Makefile

Hi, let me add to this topic, since I have seen that also "gnome" apps, for example, have different prefixes. One think is of course the original application name, it may already contain the library/framework/desktop name. Riccardo Mottola via devel wrote: Dagobert Michelsen via devel

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.2 transition

Hi! Heads up! Dagobert Michelsen wrote: In this case I would just override with a comment explaining why the ISA was raised. 1.0.2k compiled on all platforms and test suite passed. Should I push my packages? How would you test this further, Jan? Riccardo

GNUtls3 build issues

Hi, I am trying to rebuild the current recipe of GNUtls3 as a start to bring things up-to-date. I need it on Solaris 9 too. After the "respin" we can decide a path to upgrade to a different soname version (as I understand it we have 2.8, current would be 3.4, correct me if I am wrong) I

pagealign linking issues

Hi all. after some tweaks, I am able to start configure and build of the new OpenSSL 1.0.2 on Solaris 9. On both x86 and SPARC, however, build fails with: ld: fatal: file /usr/lib/ld/map.pagealign: stat failed: No such file or directory Indeed, that linker file does not exist. Have you

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.2 transition

Hi, Riccardo Mottola via maintainers wrote: solaris 9x -> unable to finish build + i386 vs amd64 issues solaris 9s -> build begins but fails (differently than 9x: pk11 issues) solaris 10x -> build + test OK solaris 10s -> build OK, test fail solaris 11x -> build + test OK solar

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.2l release

Hi, I actually launched a rebuild yesterday, but an incomplete reemerge, so I completed today. But no issues with you fixing and completing the work, Dago! are unstable and experimental "comparable" in terms of hardware specs? Perhaps the some stuff was busy or not? I just quickly glanced

gnutls3 status : test failures and ipv6 on solaris 9

Hi! I did some work on a new GNUTLS, which I think we do quite need, like a new OpenSSL. Especially the version on solaris 9 is so aged I can't compile some dependencies and I bet it is also quite insecure. I got GNUTLS 3.5.14 to compile on Solaris 10 (see test results below) and a some

unstable9s "hangs"

Hi, while building gnutls3 on solaris 9 I get a strange hang: Here is what happens on unstable9s, on unstable9x it works! create mode 100644 tests/x509sign-verify2.c Switched to a new branch 'csw' [extract-modulated] complete for gnutls. ==> Applying patch

Re: crearting a patch

Hi, Riccardo Mottola via maintainers wrote: Have you checked this page about "gmake makepatch"? https://buildfarm.opencsw.org/trac/wiki/GitMakepatch Thanks for the reminder :) I had a new read. after a clean start and a bit of cleanup in the receip,e "mgar makepatch"

rebuild a package - same version number,

Hi all, I have a question.. surely "trivial" but that is itching me. I need to issue a new release of certain packages: the dependencies they are built on have been updated. The package itself does not have a new release version though. How can I update it anyway? e.g GS Performance builds

Re: rebuild a package - same version number,

Hi Dago, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: The package name is broken, there must not be an uppercase character after CSW. In this case there is already a correctly named package CSWperformance. Just change the name back as it was before (CSWperformance is fine) and it should work. the original

platforms build hangs at juicing

Hi all! I wanted to rebuild all the GNUstep packages with the fresh releases. I started with gnustep-make of course, but when sparc 9 finishes /home/rmottola/spool.5.9-sparc/CSWgnustep-make/install/checkpkg_override /home/rmottola/spool.5.9-sparc/CSWgnustep-make/install/copyright

Re: platforms build hangs at juicing

Hi, On 2018-01-30 16:19:26 +0100 Dagobert Michelsen via maintainers wrote: Hi, this is an issue with the wrapper for the Solaris 9 brand where fork hangs. I have not identified the issue yet. For starters you can build the packages Once such a similar

Re: platforms build hangs at juicing

Hi Dago, you essentially do: dam@unstable10x [global]:/home/dam/staging/build-19.Jan.2018 > PYTHONPATH=~/mgar/pkg/.buildsys/v2 ~/mgar/pkg/.buildsys/v2/bin/checkpkg --os-releases=SunOS5.10 --catalog-architecture=sparc --catalog-release=unstabl e

ICU update

Hi, to update gnustep-base I'd need an ICU update on Solaris 9: the one there gets detected, but is too old. (I guess GNUstep could be better at version detecion, but that's another thing). NSDateFormatter.m: In function '-[NSDateFormatter(PrivateMethods) _resetUDateFormat]':

Re: ICU update

Hi, again, I answer myself :) this time I hope I have an easy question. On 2018-02-16 11:59:48 +0100 Riccardo Mottola via maintainers <maintainers@lists.opencsw.org> wrote: Hi, to update gnustep-base I'd need an ICU update on Solaris 9: the one there gets detected, but is too o

Re: ICU update

Hi, On 2018-02-20 13:10:51 +0100 Dagobert Michelsen wrote: Sure. # Wrong return code of test TestEnumSet on Solaris 9, skip testsuite for now SKIPTEST-5.9 = 1 SKIPTEST ?= $(SKIPTEST-$(GAROSREL)) I remember SKIPTEST... indeed clean, that it is for OS 9. Works! now my

Re: ICU update

Hi, Riccardo Mottola via maintainers wrote: I think I need at least v52 Did somebody already attempt this.. is it known impossible and/or something that will cause a total dependecy breakage? I may answer to myself that there is a specific 52 package made by Dagobert! Thus most probably

Re: IRC under attack

Hi, Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński via maintainers wrote: In the meantime, I don't know if there's actually anything happening on #opencsw. Did anybody notice the spam bots? if you mean random users getting in and advertising blogs, fake news and then disconnecting the yes. e.g.:     -->| 

Re: IRC under attack

when you can, add grey_gandalf too :)

Re: OpenCSW 10th Anniversary Camp

Hi, Laurent Blume via maintainers wrote: A camp with more beer and less Solaris? Count me in! But some hacking would be fun nevertheless?? I'm good for Dublin, I've not been there yet. I'm also good for pretty much any locale reachable under a 6 hour flight for that kind of short stay, so

Re: ICU update

Hi Dagobert, On 02/20/18 20:43, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: Hi Riccardo, now my last issue: I have these: CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibicu-dev +=

issue with applying patch during build

Hi, while building the new gnustep-gui package, I have an issue: mgar hangs (on unstable9s): create mode 100755 travis-deps.sh Switched to a new branch 'csw' [extract-modulated] complete for gnustep-gui. ==> Applying patch

Issue with non-existing package

Hi, in WebServices I pull in a dependency on CSWperformance. It is normal that it is not found because of binding, so I put in: CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWgnustep-webservices += surplus-dependency|CSWgnustep-make CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWgnustep-webservices += surplus-dependency|CSWgnustep-base

Re: Issue with non-existing package

Hi Macjej. Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński wrote: Try the following way to debug it: 1. Navigate to http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/ 2. Click "buildfarm database" -- this is checkpkg's reference to the state of the package catalogs 3. Click "catalog list". You will see table with various catalogs.

Re: Issue with non-existing package

Hi, Maciej Bliziński wrote: On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 01:21:05AM +0200, Riccardo Mottola wrote: it says CSWPerformance1 this happened I think during a renaming where I changed case.. what a mess. Maybe I should just rebuild and reissue the package and see if it helps, after reinstalling it?

issue with bogus override

Hi! I am updating the gnustep base package. Little changed, except the new version. When I build it, I get this:  * File root/opt/csw/GNUstep/System/Library/Libraries/gnustep-    base/Versions/1.26/Resources/NSTimeZones/README contains bad content:    '/usr/local'. If it's a legacy file

Re: issue with bogus override

Hi Dago! Dagobert Michelsen wrote: If any of the reported errors were false positives, you can override them pasting the lines below to the GAR recipe. CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWgnustep-base +=

Re: Issue with non-existing package

Hi, let us take the "strong" route, remove traces of Performance, re-upload it again. Sorry for the delay, the last time I tried there were issues with the catalog, now I retried. Thank you! Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński wrote: Use the following command to remove the package:

Re: Issue with non-existing package

Hi Dagobert, On 12/3/18 1:34 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: You need to set PYTHONPATH. I just ran it: dam@login [login]:/home/dam/mgar/gar/v2 > export PYTHONPATH=`pwd` dam@login [login]:/home/dam/mgar/gar/v2 > cd lib/python dam@login [login]:/home/dam/mgar/gar/v2/lib/python >

Re: Issue with non-existing package

Hi Dagobert! thank you, now, at least, I can rebuild the packages without getting conflicts with itself! :) Maybe talso the SunOS5.11 catalogs need to be purged? http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/pkgdb/srv4/181150ad712ffa53e81c6a4aa3ff91df/ When trying to upload, one of them gets an issue

issue uploading packages / service unavailable

Hi, I am trying since Friday to upload the performance packages again and I get this: rmottola@login [login]:~/pkgs > csw-upload-pkg performance-0.5.0\,REV\=2018.12.06-SunOS5.* /opt/csw/bin/csw-upload-pkg is a wrapper, running /home/rmottola/opencsw/.buildsys/v2/bin/csw-upload-pkg

Re: issue uploading packages / service unavailable

Hi, On 12/10/18 1:42 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: The webservice stops once in a while, please retry, :) :) all the world is a village :) It worked again today, however I still have issue with the Solaris 11 catalogs, after you cleaned out all remnants of the old packages. Checks

Re: Mail Server Fan Failed

Hi Ihsan, is it the system Fan or the tray? https://www.ebay.it/itm/Sun-Fire-T2000-System-Lufter-Fan-541-0275/151271606839?hash=item23387d8a37:g:dvMAAOSw5m1a7XiZ:rk:4:pf:0

new ncurses

Hi all! proud to announce the new 6.2 of ncurses, now also for solaris 9! I hope the current maintainer is not offended by the work :-P Riccardo

off-topic - broken T2000 - cpu error message

Hi all! I have a Netra T2000 which I use little (darn noisy, prefer my T1s...) but I extra got to do some more in-house for BigEndian and SPARC support! I got it working some months ago and I used it little (no big compilations yet, I just familiarized and installed and tested OpenCSW

Re: rebuilding gcc 4.8 on solaris 9

Hi! On 21/06/2020 18:26, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: Am 20.06.2020 um 16:02 schrieb Riccardo Mottola via maintainers: I am attempting to rebuild gcc 4.8.4 on solaris 9 (we have a branch for that) with the goal to get it to 4.8.5 then... This is probably due to sparcv8plus vs. sparcv8

Re: rebuilding gcc 4.8 on solaris 9

Hi, On 21/06/2020 18:26, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: This is probably due to sparcv8plus vs. sparcv8 but this is only guesswork from me. Getting gcc to compile is actually pretty hard. I tried to build current gcc 4.x, from our repo, on solaris 9. it is 4.9.3, I of course did

rebuilding gcc 4.8 on solaris 9

Hi! I am attempting to rebuild gcc 4.8.4 on solaris 9 (we have a branch for that) with the goal to get  it to 4.8.5 then... We need something better than 4.6, I don't know how far solaris 9 can be taken, but I hope solaris 10 can then take gcc 6.5 which is a pretty good compiler. "other

patching ncurses for solaris 9

Hi all, you might have noticed I have updated ncurses to latest. Fine and cool... however on solaris it compiles, but does not work. The issue is I think "easy": I need to patch a file... I think just a header include is missing but it is "generated" configure:22605: /opt/csw/bin/gcc-4.6 -c

missing libproc.h

Hi all, trying again my luck in porting htop - limiting myself to solaris 10 for now. There is explicit Solaris support, which is promising. However build fails for me with: In file included from AvailableMetersPanel.c:24:0: ./solaris/Platform.h:20:21: fatal error: libproc.h: No such file or

built packages, where are they?

Hi all, I started upgrading some packages after a long time... I did "mgar platforms"  #    #  ##  #       ##  ##  ##  #   #    #  #    #  #  # ## #  #   #    #  #   #  #    #  #   #   #  ###  #  #    #  #   #   #   #    #  #  #    #  ##  #   

Re: built packages, where are they?

Hi Dago, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Works for me: > > The following packages have been built: > > CSWgnustep-make > /home/rmottola/pkgs/gnustep_make-2.9.0,REV=2021.11.15-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > > [package-svr4] complete for gnustep-make. > rmottola@unstable10s