On 29/11/21 9:30 pm, Nigel Verity wrote:
> There are other aspects which are less easy for MS to plagiarise,
however. Try contacting Microsoft to ask for a new feature to be
implemented and see how far you get either (a) contacting the person who
makes such decisions or (b) succeeding in
Hi everyone,
The website team is working on a new design (see the website list for
details). One of the planned features on the front page is a "How we're
different" table, providing a quick comparison with other projects:
https://i.imgur.com/puBkMZz.png
This could be an opportunity to show
A feature table is great for providing an "at a glance" list of what LO does
that MS Office doesn't. It has the unfortunate side-effect, though, of
providing a list of features for MS to build into the requirements for their
next version of Office, thereby nullifying that difference.
There are
>"(...) how LibreOffice is by far the most actively developed successor to
the OpenOffice.org project."
I think successor is a very strong word to refer to someone who still has:
*6 October 2021:*
Announcing Apache OpenOffice 4.1.11
I don't know if it helps, but I think there are some very good tips here:
https://www.online-tech-tips.com/software-reviews/libreoffice-vs-microsoft-office-which-is-best-for-you/
And then there is what is already known:
https://www.libreoffice.org/discover/libreoffice-vs-openoffice/
