Re: upcoming tuxmag article

2005-08-22 Thread Quim Gil
Something like this to start: http://gnomesupport.org/wiki/index.php/GnomeMyths As said, yes, we would need to have something like this accessible from http://gnome.org/about/ I couldn't call it Myths, because some of the aspects criticised are real, but GNOME has a different opinion (real as

Re: upcoming tuxmag article

2005-08-15 Thread Travis Reitter
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 16:43 -0400, Luis Villa wrote: On 8/15/05, David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have gotten some notice that the next issue of tuxmag will contain a negative article on GNOME - it's likely to get some slashdot-type attention, so it might be an idea to be somewhat

Re: upcoming tuxmag article

2005-08-15 Thread Jeff Waugh
quote who=Travis Reitter Do we need a standard FUD response (like a standard FAQ)? Guys, there was no FUD in this email, just a lot of standard Nick Petreley attitude. - Jeff -- EuroOSCON: October 17th-20thhttp://conferences.oreillynet.com/eurooscon/ You put on the pants, and the

Re: tuxmag

2005-06-08 Thread Michael J. Hammel
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 17:38, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: Perhaps, something can be done about that as well so that we have new content to give to other print magazines. Do they pay for these submissions? Do they also accept the creative common license as well? Just curious. Tux pays. Rates

Re: **** X-spasm **** Re: tuxmag

2005-05-16 Thread Sriram Ramkrishna
for some reason your mail got tagged as spam and I never saw it. :/ On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 02:46:41PM -0600, Michael J. Hammel wrote: On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 17:38, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: Perhaps, something can be done about that as well so that we have new content to give to other print

Re: tuxmag

2005-05-13 Thread David Neary
Hi all, This is a mail from Michael Hammel (regular author with tuxmag, thak KDE magazine we mentioned a while back). He has some interesting comments, and a contact address for the editor. Thanks for letting me forward the mail along, Michael. Cheers, Dave. Michael J. Hammel wrote: On Mon

Re: tuxmag

2005-05-13 Thread Luke Stroven
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 22:53 +0200, David Neary wrote: The editor is Nicholas Petreley - [EMAIL PROTECTED] He's a nice guy but may not reply quickly. That's common in the magazine world. Just have to be patient, and sometimes a *little* pushy. ;-) There isn't anyone else to contact

Re: tuxmag

2005-05-13 Thread Sriram Ramkrishna
they pay for these submissions? Do they also accept the creative common license as well? Just curious. sri On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 10:53:41PM +0200, David Neary wrote: Hi all, This is a mail from Michael Hammel (regular author with tuxmag, thak KDE magazine we mentioned a while back). He has