I'll get back to Sluga and Friedman, but first:
May, Todd. On the Very Idea of Continental (Or for that Matter
Anglo-American) Philosophy, Metaphilosophy, vol. 33, no. 4, July
2002, pp. 401-25.
The author delineates ten differences that characterize these
allegedly different traditions and
Ralph D:
Now, point 10 is of some interest to me, unlike the rest of this
insufferable banality. The more I read material like this, the more I
come to the conclusion how worthless this whole gambit is. Here are
some observations:
(1) Ultimately, this is not about where we stand and what's
Aren't many of the analyticals anti-Hegelians, find dialectic to be
nonsense ? Frege, Russell don't deal with dialectic. Whitehead ? Does
Wittgenstein ?
Without dialectic, they would tend to treat reality as static.
As to continentals, does Heidegger deal with dialectic ?
Charles
This
I was thinking of this one too as a a specimen of Black Americanism,
but couldn't remember the reference.
At 12:41 PM 6/23/2008, Charles Brown wrote:
Let America Be America Again
by Langston Hughes
___
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Please forward widely.
Dear Friend of United for Peace and Justice,
The U.S. House of Representatives is considering a new resolution that
could effectively demand a blockade against Iran -- an act that would be
widely seen as an act of war and could invite Iranian retaliation,
possibly leading
In _Here I Stand_ (1958), Robeson says:
Yes , for well over 300 years my people have been a part of American
life and history. A half-century has passed since W.E.B. Dubois , in his
classic _The Souls of Black Folk_ challenged white Americans in these
words of poetry and truth:
Your country ?
I always thought Paul Healey was a nut. Several of these people on
the Hegel lists are insufferable.
At 03:11 PM 6/23/2008, Charles Brown wrote:
http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/txt/paulh01.htm
From: Paul Healey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hegel's 'Absolute Idealism'..
Static, I think is another issue distinct from dialectic.
CB: Please elaborate.
What's your understanding of what Frege brings to logic ? Your words
This message has been scanned for malware by SurfControl plc.
www.surfcontrol.com
___
structuralist linguistics
CeJ jannuzi at gmail.com
That worldwide so many languages have
similar-sounding words for babies to say 'mama'. There are NATURAL
reasons why babies everywhere say such similar things. Because their
physiological and phonological development limits what they can say to
Chomsky and Halle don't overthrow the basic concept of phoneme,
distinctive features, e.g. voiced and unvoiced as a binary opposition,
do they ? That makes too much obvious sense. provable by any human
speaker. Surely , in English big is differentiated from pig by
voiced/unvoiced significant
To name a few linguistic phenomena worthy of consideration as
motivated (not arbitrary): sound symbolisms, like phonomimes,
phenomimes, pscyhomimes. I can tell you, for example, the words for
'knock knock' as in knocking on a door, in English are not that
different from Japanese (kan-kan). Why the
It'd be really fine if you took the time to elaborate and articulate the
below more precisely, and with historical specific examples
Charles
For the moment I would like to point out something that is
fundamental to Hegel and Marx in different and incompatible
formulations. I need to find
I'm in a rush, so just a few comments for now.
Beyond the cataloging of various thinkers as politically left or
right, there is the question of long-term trends, or elective
affinities between philosophies and political orientations.
For example, See Stephen Eric Bronner's indispensable book
13 matches
Mail list logo
