CB: Note the last question is in recognition of the issue we are debating
here,usage of mode of production. And , yes, I know that Marx is ambiguous in
that usage. However, he does use it to refer to especially property relations
in one of those double usages, and that is the usage connected to
Friends, what are our choices in modifying our position on making these
scandalous payments? This is the same position of power and theft that the
World
Bank and IMF holds over the subjugated countries of the South. Thanks to Diane
and Bankole for their reporting and editing on these articles.
Communism - not socialism, is impossible unless one has the economic legs to
stand on or a revolution in the mode of production (not simply the property
relations) that destroys value by qualitatively reconfiguring the labor process
where the great mass of humanity's labor is not needed in the
Of course, the SU's sciences and math was not without errors,etc. In fact ,
trial and error as a process of the development of anything, including
science, is what Marxism expects. This is some of that same rhetoric and
ideology, Marxist rhetoric and ideology , that you refer to below. It comes
Have been following your discussion with considerable interest. Sorry
to lurk so long, but I was occupied in finishing up a paper.
I was particularly interested in your earlier discussion on emergence.
I agree strongly with Jay Gould that dialectics; Hegelian and Marxist alike,
The princely paradox of Malcolm X
Forty years on, his legacy offers an example to people of all ethnicities
Jesse Jackson
Tuesday February 22, 2005
The Guardian
As I reflect on the life of Malcolm X 40 years after his assassination, I do
so with a keen understanding of the political, social and
1. Re: Van Heijenoort's critique of Engels (Ralph Dumain)
2. Van Heijenoort's critique of Engels (Hans G. Ehrbar)
3. Van Heijenoort's critique of Engels (Charles Brown)
4. Re: Van Heijenoort's critique of Engels (Ralph Dumain)
5. Re: Van Heijenoort's critique of Engels (Ralph Dumain)
I have been reading Ralph Dumain's notes. The notion of everything as
process /nothing is a particle seems a neo-Hericlitean one.
Charles
___
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
I wrote the following back in 1998 for Proyect's Marxmail list.
Jim F.
--
The Fall 1998 issue of SCIENCE SOCIETY is a special issue devoted to
dialectics: The New Frontier. It features noted Marxist scholars,
Bertell Ollman and Tony Smith, as the guest
I'm substantially in agreement with you here. Now, if one wants to unify
the marxist and natural-scientific perspectives, in place of relegating
them to separate perspectives, then one has to rise to that level of
abstraction to construct a unified account of both. This ridiculous meme
10 matches
Mail list logo
