Comrades,
It is obviously true that we, the subscribers, have shown a great apathy and
silence in discussing any suggested topic for a while. Is there any
necessary reason for this apathy and silence?
Javad
___
Marxist-Leninist-List mailing list
Comrades,
History has again shown itself as the supreme judge of necessity and freedom
at the same time. Wojciech Jaruzelski of the former socialist Poland has
said uncle in many words of his lecture at Kansas State University in March
1996. This is not suprising at all because Jaruzelski was
Comrade Alex, comrade Sanjay, and Comrade Dover,
Thank you very much for your replies. I hope that we will overcome some of
our necessary personal problems and become active again in discusssing some
important issues.
In relation to Alex's comment, I see your point, if I am not mistaken, that
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Javad Eskandarpour
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 5:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [MLL] Stalin and language!
Comrades,
Since I have access to my e-mails again, I would like to ask the following
question: What IS language according to Stalin? I am not interested
?
Javad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Bill Howard
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 9:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [MLL] Fukuyama, an Apologist of Imperialism!
- Original Message -
From: Javad Eskandarpour
Comrade Mark,
You make a good commentary on the necessity of the public archives for this
list. Also, since many people do not like to open attachments, this is your
e-mail with the text of the attachment.
Javad
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Comrade Guerrero,
I had postponed my analysis of Mao's On New Democracy because of the
inactive list, but I will continue with my analysis of it.
Javad
- Original Message -
From: Redmond Guerrero [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ML
Comrades,
Israel Shahak, an anti-Zionist, but not a communist, is dead.
He was a great human in opposing Fascism in the from ofZionism. His
humanity might be an influnence of the great Spinoza, which Christopher
Hitchens, regardless of hisown illusion of"no dogmas" and of "no
party
Comrade Moreira,
If the non-members send something to enhance our understanding of the world
events, it is reasonable not only let them through but also ask them to be
members.
Javad
- Original Message -
From: Charles F. Moreira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday,
Comrades,
A correction to my e-mail: The CPUSA discussion list actually posted two of
my e-mails, the first one was posted because it was the first one!
Javad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Javad Eskandarpour
Sent
Comrades,
InfoTimes is a very good addition to the MLL through its many insightful
articles.
Javad
___
Marxist-Leninist-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
Comrade Magnus,
You might read the articles posted by InfoTimes along with the
pro-imperialist and pro-Zionist papers, like New York Times and others,
critically since the assumption is that you can distinguish the Fascist
elements (of the Zionist Israeli-type or the Nazi-type) in them instead
Comrades,
I also agree with the main points of talking points on the wtc/pentagon.
World Imperialism clearly wants to use the attack on the WTC and the
Pentagon to strengthen the rule of Capital around the world at the expense
of the world working-class and preserve the Fascist state of Israel
Comrades,
I hope that my reply to John Pietaro will be posted in the name of socialist
freedom of speech. There are some people, like Pietaro, who keep objecting
to their own strawmen in relation to the so-called mistakes or crimes of
Stalin. I would like to repeat that we are not proponents
Comrades,
The following is a letter by a Muslim, which has some good obsevations in
relation to the attacks on the WTC and the Petagon.
Javad
Letter from a Muslim
Yesterday was unlike most, as Manhattan's blue sky became
Comrade Magnus
The question is what is objectionable about the content of the article, not
the source of the article, which is well-known for their views like some
other pro-imperialist think-tanks and sources.
Javad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Comrade Magnus,
I hope that you, a socialist, will not use such a vulgar language (s**t)
to convey your ideas here. Also, instead of your false reference to
Jewhating stuff, you better provide the actual content of the supposed
material with your critique to enlighten the readers, unless you
Comrade George,
I am aware of the title of the article, on which I made some general remarks
on Zionists and Jews in my previous e-mail. In addition, the title of an
article does not reveal its content. Even if one finds the title of an
article problematic, one might mention its problem and
Comrades,
This is an article by Robert Fisk, which is published in London's The
Independent (UK).
Javad
What Muslim would write: 'The time of fun and waste is gone'?
Robert Fisk
29 September 2001
Fearful, chilling, grot-esque – but also very, very odd. If the handwritten,
five-page
Comrade Mark,
Thank you very much for your comments. Since I might make some more remarks
later on your ideas as to being Marxist-Leninist revolutionaries, I would
like to ask you two questions.
You state the following: If we are going to be serious about our claims to
being Marxist-Leninist
Comrade Klo,
Since you mentioned Stalin's support of Trofim Lysenko's scientific works,
Lysenko is ridiculed, in favour of a supposedly genuine science of biology
with its still mythical isolated naked DNA or RNA origin of a biological
organism, by bourgeois scientists and socialist ones too,
!
Javad Eskandarpour wrote:
Comrade Klo,
Since you mentioned Stalin's support of Trofim Lysenko's scientific works,
Lysenko is ridiculed, in favour of a supposedly genuine science of
biology
with its still mythical isolated naked DNA or RNA origin of a biological
organism, by bourgeois
Dear Klo,
I asked for a reply, but not a tantrum! A tantrum performed in a maze of
illogical commentaries on almost every isolated statement.
Since you do not say anything new, except repeating your pro-imperialist
view of the war of the imperialist coalition forces against Afghanistan, and
Comrade Alexander,
You are right about the labyrinthine nature of the post, which was generated
by Klo's strange style of commenting on every isolated statement.
I agree with the main points of your analysis on the nature of the
imperialist war against Afghanistan. I addition, I might add that
Comrade Alan,
I apologize for misspelling your name as Allen in my previuous e-mail.
Javad
___
Marxist-Leninist-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
Comrades,
An article by Robert Fisk on the atrocities of the Fascist Zionist state of
Israel.
Javad
Another war on terror. Another proxy army. Another mysterious massacre. And
now, after 19 years, perhaps the truth at last...
The eyes of the world are on Afghanistan, but today a Belgian
Comrade Klo,
I read your comments on Koran. Before making any remarks, I would like to
mention that Marxist-Leninists certainly discuss the material foundations of
religion, specific religions, and their specific nature without distortions
of their principles and ideas, and make their
Comrades,
This is another article on the two political imbeciles, Bush and Blair, by
Robert Fisk.
Javad
Robert Fisk: Bush and Blair have already lost the talking war across the
Middle East
10 October 2001
Messrs Bush and Blair may tell the world they are going to win the war
against
Comrades,
Since the goal of world Imperialism, headed by the U.S. Imperialism, in
attacking Afghanistan is not just to smash some states and organizations in
the Middle East for the sake of world Imperialism and also for the sake of
the only democracy in the Middle East--the Fascist state of
Comrades,
This is another article on the Imperialist war against Afghanistan by Robert
Fisk.
Javad
Robert Fisk: Slaughter of the innocent bolsters view that this is war
against Islam
15 October 2001
In Baghdad we had the bunker where our missile fried more than 300 people to
death. In
Comrades,
This is another article by Robert Fisk. He makes some good observations on
the plight of the people in the Middle East, and also on the concept of
injustice which is a virtue of Imperialism.
Javad
Robert Fisk:
Comrade George,
I agree with the main ideas of this article, which expose the nature of this
imperialist war against Afghanistan, and oppose the illusions of
Trotskyites, and of Marxist-Leninists with their pro-imperialist views of
the war in their shameful hope of a democratic opening in
Comrades,
An article, by Robert Fisk, on the sufferings of the toiling masses in
Afghanistan in this genocidal imperialist war against Afghanistan, which is
welcome by shameless and hypocritical liberals and pro-imperialist
Marxist-Leninists under the pretext of having a democratic opening for
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 8:42 AM
Subject: Re: [MLL] Imperialism's Terrorism!
Javad Eskandarpour wrote:
Comrades,
An article, by Robert Fisk, on the sufferings of the toiling masses in
Afghanistan in this genocidal imperialist war against Afghanistan, which
is
welcome
.
Javad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
kloMcKinsey
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 4:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [MLL] Imperialism's Terrorism!
Javad Eskandarpour wrote:
Dear Klo,
As I mentioned before
Comrades,
I would like to say few things about the so-called character-assassination
in a debate. A genuine character assassination is performed when one
ignores an opponent's arguments in favor of a personal attack on some
qualities which are not germane to a debate. But there are cases in
Comrades,
This is an article, by Robert Fisk, about his beating in
Afghanistan. Fisk is more Marxist-Leninist than many of our pompous
pro-imperialist "socialists" in his understanding of the nature of this
imperialist war against Afghanistan.
Javad
My beating by refugees is a
Comrades,
This is an article, by Robert Fisk, about his beating in Afghanistan. Fisk
is more Marxist-Leninist than many of our pompous pro-imperialist
socialists in his understanding of the nature of this imperialist war
against Afghanistan.
Javad
My beating by refugees is a symbol of
Comrades,
I would like to say few things about the so-called character-assassination
in a debate. A genuine character assassination is performed when one
ignores an opponent's arguments in favor of a personal attack on some
qualities which are not germane to a debate. But there are cases in
Comrades of Catalunya,
Thank you for great e-mails as to the atrocities of world Imperialism. I
hope we will see many of your e-mails in English.
Javad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
contracorriente
Sent: Wednesday, December 12,
Comrades,
Let me make a remark on the observations of Flat-Earth fans as to
proletarian revolutions. These fans, maybe one or two on this list, make
their claim of no proletarian revolution in history so far, and ask their
opponents brazenly to provide a counterexample to their Flat-Earth
Comrades,
In considering Alan's points, I would like to mention the following things.
(1) As I remarked before, Klo's Flat-Earth thesis, concerning the alleged
no-proletarian revolutions so far, is an anti-communist thesis. The
absurdity of this anti-communist thesis can be shown very easily,
Comrades,
Some of us might recall Alan's thesis of different proletarian
revolutions, new path, and his references to Lenin's April theses, but
some of us might not. Since Alan thinks that I have blinkers on not to see
Alan's view of two distinct roads to socialism, and insufficient knowledge,
Comrade Alan,
Questions with false premises might look like questions, but answers to them
inevitably will be false statements. So, in relation to your and Charles'
question, in which developed country has a successful socialist revolution
occured?, let me say that Lenin was not entertaining
Comrades,
Charles advocates a Maoist formulation of proletarian revolutions, which
Alan repeats after Maoists, by referring the reader to a strategy adopted
by Mao Tse Tung and which is currently being used by the Communist Party of
the Philippines. Maoist formulation of proletarian revolution
comrades,
Charles Moreira wrote the following in connection to my remarks: I'd like
to ask Cde. Javad to tell us what are his proposals for socialist revolution
in colonial, semi-colonial, feudal and semi-feudal countries. That would be
a much more positive contribution to debate on this list
accusations of `Maoism', does
this shrugging off mean that Alan's idea of Lenin's two-stage revolution
is opposed to a Maoist one?!
Javad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Javad Eskandarpour
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 1
Comrade Alan,
Could you answer the following question: Since you want to shrugg off the
foolish accusations of `Maoism', does this shrugging off mean that your
idea of Lenin's two-stage revolution is opposed to a Maoist one?
Javad
___
:16 AM
Subject: Re: [MLL] The Flat-Earth Thesis and Proletarian Revolutions!
Javad Eskandarpour wrote:
Comrades,
In considering Alan's points, I would like to mention the following
things.
(1) As I remarked before, Klo's Flat-Earth thesis, concerning the
alleged
no-proletarian
Comrade Alan,
Another problem refers to my possible presentation of my idea of
proletarian revolutions in itself. The point is to investigate your thesis
of two different chains of developing and developed countries with their
respective two roads to socialism first, and then consider this
Comrade Alan,
There are no insinuations of sectarianism (whatever they mean) here. The
point is that if your idea of proletarian revolutions is a version of Maoist
idea, say so instead of saying it indirectly when you mention that Mao also
employed the principles of Lenin's two-stage revolution.
Comrade Mark,
Your points of disagreement with my views are welcome.
Javad
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 4:52 PM
Subject: Re: [MLL] The Flat-Earth Thesis and Proletarian Revolutions!
Comrade Javad.
You
Comrade Alan,
Alan:
- Original Message -
From: Alan Dover [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 2:32 PM
Subject: RE: [MLL] Lenin's two-stage revolution.
Comrade Javad,
In saying Mao employed his own idea of proletarian revolution .which
has
first. That is reasonable and fine by me comrade. Say the word and I
will
post the relevent article for your investigation.
fraternally Alan.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Javad Eskandarpour
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 11
Comrade Alan,
I really do not know why you want to attribute false ideas to me instead of
proceeding with showing the truth of your thesis. As I mentioned several
times, I am interested in ideas of Marx, Engels, Lenin, and revolutionary
Marxist-Leninists, but not in the misconceptions of
Comrades,
I am going to make my remarks in relation to the quoted passages of Marx,
Engles, and Lenin, and also in relation to Alan's interpretations of those
passages. In other words, Alan presents his ideas, and I simply make some
critical remarks on his interpretations.
Alan:
-
Comrades,
I do not know how many of you follow this discussion, but I hope that some
do because this kind of discussion is instructive and funny. Why instructive
and funny? It shows the nature of a Biblical-inspired discussion, and the
naiveté which struts around in the name of science, and all
Comrades,
As I mentioned before, I want to see what Alan says to show the truth of his
thesis. Of course, I cannot have a final conclusion regarding his thesis
before his complete presentation of his ideas, but this does not mean that I
can have partial conclusions based on his hitherto
Comrade Charles,
A good commentary by you on this evidence of the rapacious interest of world
Imperialism in Afghanistan. Apparently, Fidel Castro did not read this
report, or simply ignored the nature of imperialism to say that the US
imperialism does not have any interest in the Central Asian
-
From: Alan Dover [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2002 1:56 PM
Subject: RE: [MLL] Lenin's two-stage revolution.
Comrade Javad,
in reply to your post:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Javad
development from 1847 to the
present
day or not.
fraternally Alan.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Javad Eskandarpour
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:26 AM
To: MLL
Subject: RE: [MLL] Lenin's two-stage revolution
with a Marxist-Leninist self-criticism of his own
fallacious ideas in order to not to waste anybody's time.
Javad
Comrade Javad,
In reply:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Javad
addressed to the list:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Javad Eskandarpour
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 12:40 AM
To: MLL
Subject: RE: [MLL] Lenin's two-stage revolution.
Comrades,
I show Alan's mistake, but he accuses me
:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Javad Eskandarpour
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 12:40 AM
To: MLL
Subject: RE: [MLL] Lenin's two-stage revolution.
Comrades,
I show Alan's mistake, but he accuses me of misquotations. I
!
Javad
- Original Message -
From: kloMcKinsey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 6:37 PM
Subject: Re: [MLL] The Flat-Earth Thesis and Proletarian Revolutions!
Javad Eskandarpour wrote:
Comrades,
Apparently, since Klo is busy
-jumbos.
Javad
- Original Message -
From: kloMcKinsey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 7:49 AM
Subject: Re: [MLL] The Flat-Earth Thesis and Proletarian Revolutions!
Javad Eskandarpour wrote:
Comrades,
As I mentioned before, Lenin' passage
] The Flat-Earth Thesis and Proletarian Revolutions!
Javad Eskandarpour wrote:
Comrades,
Now, Klo performs his miracle by saying that the Russian Revolution was
a
successful proletarian revolution but it was not executed by the
proletariat
but by the peasantry. It only became
Alan.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Javad Eskandarpour
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 6:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [MLL] Lenin's two-stage revolution.
Comrades,
Alan keeps attributing some of his
Comrade Mark,
I agree with your idea of refuting opportunism, not only sophisticated
opportunism of the Second International level, but also primitive
opportunism of Klo-type people.
Javad
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January
Comrades,
Alan still pushes his innovations in Marxism-Leninism, this time by
referring to Klo and his anti-Marxist-Leninist ideas, like his Flat-Earth
thesis that there has never been any successful proletarian revolution so
far! Well, they might improve each other's understanding of
Comrades,
I hope we will study Lenin's theory of proletarian revolution as expressed
and practiced by Lenin, Lenin's Bolshevik party, and the Russian proletariat
and toiling masses; otherwise we will end up inventing some stories of
proletarian revolution (like Alan's which is based on his false
Comrades,
Alan and Klo are indeed two willing and sighted people to falsify
Marxism-Leninism! One sighted leads the other one!
Javad
- Original Message -
From: Alan Dover [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 8:24 PM
Subject:
, 2002 7:56 AM
Subject: [MLL] Re: Lenin's Two stage revolution.
Javad Eskandarpour:
Comrades,
Alan and Klo are indeed two willing and sighted people to falsify
Marxism-Leninism! One sighted leads the other one!
Embarrassing, all of it. And tedious, every word
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Javad Eskandarpour
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 5:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [MLL] MLL] Lenin's Two stage revolution.
Comrades,
Alan, our Marxist-Leninist, keeps attributing false ideas to me
constantly
(even after reading my rejection
-Leninist idea.
But if Klo still wants to entertain himself and other willing people with
his Flat-Earth thesis, then good luck to Klo and company!
Javad
Javad Eskandarpour wrote:
Comrades,
Klo states the following: Why would I need to provide specifics in this
instance when
]
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 9:54 PM
Subject: Re: [MLL] Re: Lenin's Two stage revolution.
Javad Eskandarpour wrote:
Comrades,
I have a brief remarks.
Klo wants to know upon what basis could I make your [my] judgment in
regard to Stoller when he only made a short comment that did
Comrades,
Many people refer to Fascism and Zionism in their discussion of recent
events, like the imperialist war against Afghanistan, and possibly against
other countries and their working-classes, and tolling masses, and the
genocidal Fascist Zionist war of parasitic settler state of Israel
Comrade Charles,
Your call to understand ideas of social Imperialism and state capitalism
in relation to the former USSR is an appropriate one because these ideas,
among some others, have often been used as labels instead of concrete
conceptions of concrete socio-economic formations. So, for
Comrade George,
You state the following in your reply to Charles: I agree that the
question of state capitalism needs much more discussion. Why not the
question of social-imperialism in addition to state-capitalism?
Javad
- Original Message -
From: George G [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. The book Fundamentals of Political
Economy published in the period of the cultural revolution and which has
come in several English language editions does not seriously address the
issue under discussion.
Vijay
On Sun, 17 Feb 2002 Javad Eskandarpour wrote :
Comrades,
Charles states
Socialism to China itself. The book Fundamentals of Political
Economy published in the period of the cultural revolution and which has
come in several English language editions does not seriously address the
issue under discussion.
Vijay
On Sun, 17 Feb 2002 Javad Eskandarpour wrote :
Comrades
The powerful grip of Soviet revisionism is still evident in the communist
movement today particularly in the ex-USSR.
Fraternally,
Vijay.
On Sun, 17 Feb 2002 Javad Eskandarpour wrote :
Comrades,
Vijay states the following: I do not think it is
incumbent on a particular
comrade to defend
Comrades,
According to their e-mails so far, the supporters of Hoxha on this list like
to refer the reader to some controversial material which are popular in very
small circles instead of discussing it publically to show the truth of their
claim that the revisionist Soveit Union was
Marxist-Leninists who
defended Socialist Albania, they can come forward to take up Javad's
challenge.
Vijay.
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002 Javad Eskandarpour wrote :
Comrades,
According to their e-mails so far, the supporters of
Hoxha on this list like
to refer the reader to some controversial material
Comrades,
My remarks on Vijay's statements.
Vijay:
- Original Message -
From: Vijay Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 10:59 PM
Subject: [MLL] Capitalist Restoration
If there is to be a scientific discussion then the basis of discussion
to clog
readers' mailboxes by sending the complete texts of positions that are
already on the web.
George
- Original Message -
From: Javad Eskandarpour [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 4:37 AM
Subject: Re: [MLL] Capitalist Restoration
Comrades,
I have a brief remark on Maoists and Hoxhists on the issue of the so-called
social-imperialism of the former USSR.
Maoists and Hoxhists invite people to the comfort of their political cocoons
to ponder over the self-evident truths of their philosphical and political
views, including
feel, is in the material I referenced. If you disagree with
it,
please say where. Otherwise I will from here on treat your unsubstantive
comments with the silence they deserve.
George
- Original Message -
From: Javad Eskandarpour [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday
Comrades,
Alan is constantly busy to say anything against whatever I say about any
subject, even by resorting to anti-Marxist-Leninist ideas and lies. I
suggest that Alan, or Alan-type people, make themselves busy with some other
things than forming little miserable circles, on this list, by
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Javad Eskandarpour
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 2:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [MLL] RE: Capitalist Restoration
Comrades,
Alan is constantly busy to say anything against
Comrades,
If I am not mistaken, Jakko suggests that if Maoists and Hoxhists do not
present the essential outlines of their theses, in sufficient details, of
the restoration of capitalism and social-imperialism of the former USSR
after 1953, then I have only two options: (a) To continue demanding
Comrades,
I would like to make an additional remark in relation to Jaako's suggestion
regarding my two options. If, by express summations etc. of your own
views, Jaako means that I express my views of socio-political events in the
former USSR after 1953, then we deal with another topic of
Comrades,
I have seleced Martin Nicolaus' The Restoration of Capitalism in the USSR,
as one of the best reference material of Maoists and Hoxhists, and as a
basis for my summary of their theses of the restoration of capitalism and
social-imperialism in the USSR.
Let me say few things regarding
Comrades,
Letter (1)
Martin Nicolaus' The Restoration of Capitalism in the USSR is the collection
of his previously published articles on the politico-economical nature of
the former USSR after the death of J.V. Stalin.
Nicolaus states the purpose of his investigation succinctly: The
Comrades,
Letter (2)
I am going to post my e-mails with short pauses due to time constraints.
Now, let us see what Nicolaus says in his Introduction. As I mentioned
before, I am going to present the essential outlines of Nicolaus' ideas on
the restoration of capitalism in the USSR along with my
Comrades,
Letter(4)
Now, after giving the essential outlines of Martin Nicolaus' theses of
restoration of capitalism and social-imperialism in the USSR, it is
appropriate to investigate his ideas in detail, and ask Maoists and Hoxhists
on this list to elaborate on some of obscure points in
Comrades,
I hope some of the members of this list will be honest at least in
presenting their opponents' views. If one cannot observe this elementary and
necessary conduct in one's discussion, then one should drop this charade of
being socialist or Marxist-Leninist.
Alan still repeats his
Comrades,
Could anyone, especially a Maoist, point out something new in detail in the
overall political position of the Maoist Afghanistan Liberation Organization
(ALO), which one has not read before in any document of Maoist parties and
organizations?
Comrade Tariq,
Marxist-Leninists must speak against every form of exploitation and
oppression of the working-class and toiling masses by world imperialism and
Zionism around the world. I really do not know why the Communist Party of
Turkey (TKP) has not mentioned anything regarding the
Comrade Scott,
If my e-mails do not concern you, then you better not bother yourself with
them! Also, your tone of e-mail is not appropriate. So, keep your little
talk of integrity to yourself!
Javad
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
