I have (probably) a dumb question. Why do people use DIALD when PPPD
provides demand dialing? Just curious...
Cy
-Original Message-
From: Charles Shoemaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 1998 10:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Personally, I use it because it is there, and it works, and I have no
reason to take it out. Can pppd keep the link up 5 minutes after an http
packet but only 1 minute after an ftp packet? _I_ _don't_ _think_ _so_!
That said, since I nailed my link up, I have no reason to keep it.
-Tom
On
Well, I just bought an ethernet kit the other day, and networked my linux and
win98 computers, and set up masquerading. Works like a charm. Unfortunately, the
98 comp has a 56k modem, whlie the linux comp is on a 33.6. Is there any way to
make the 98 comp do the masquerading?
Yep, I figured it was a stupid question. I had no idea you could do the
variable timeouts with diald. I can definitely find a use for that too.
Guess I'll have to reinstall diald...
Thx,
Cy
-Original Message-
From: Tom Oehser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, December 27,
In the spirit of trying to kill this bug
for once and for all, here are a few KEY emails
I've saved about this issue. I hope this helps
some of the coders on the group.
--#1
Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 03:20:52 -0800
From: Keith Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Paul Bayer [EMAIL
1) There is a mailer bug that is avoided by using a smaller MTU/MRU
2) Interactive response (Telnet, SSH) is much better
3) Multiplexing between hogs (suck, etc.) and interactive is much better
I'll test setting the PPP MTU/MRU to 1500 to confirm this... is there
another way? 1500 would kill
Shoot WinNT won't even masquerade how could 98 ever hope to.
Why not swap modems?
At 02:36 PM 12/27/98 -0500, Stile wrote:
Well, I just bought an ethernet kit the other day, and networked my linux and
win98 computers, and set up masquerading. Works like a charm.
Unfortunately, the
98 comp
Hey Steve,
A while back you posted a MASQ MTU patch that was supposed to
fix our MTU issue. Did you find out if it fixed the problem
or not?
Also.. this is the patch I have for it but it doesn't look
complete. Is it? Could you repost it if it isn't complete?
--David
At 07:10 PM 12/1/97
On Sun, 27 Dec 1998, Frode wrote:
Via third party software, yes. It would likely be very
preferable to move the 56k modem to the linux tho..
That's what I've concluded. It'd be just grand if I could, but dad is against
the idea. The linux comp is mine, the ethernet is mine, but the p2-350
