tion has to resort to digging it out of the archive. It’ll be good
>> to have your steps up on the FAQ.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Shri
>>
>> From: Jose Luis Marin <mari...@gridquant.com>
>> Reply-To: MATPOWER discussion forum <matpowe...@list.cornell.edu>
his information has to resort
>> to digging it out of the archive. It’ll be good to have your steps up on the
>> FAQ.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Shri
>>
>> From: Jose Luis Marin <mari...@gridquant.com <mailto:mari...@gridquant.com>>
>> Reply-To: MATPOW
matpowe...@list.cornell.edumailto:matpowe...@list.cornell.edu
Date: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 at 2:42 AM
To: MATPOWER discussion forum
matpowe...@list.cornell.edumailto:matpowe...@list.cornell.edu
Subject: Re: convergence problem in runpf.
Mirish,
I couldn't help notice that you're building
to have your steps up on the FAQ.
Thanks,
Shri
From: Jose Luis Marin mari...@gridquant.com
Reply-To: MATPOWER discussion forum matpowe...@list.cornell.edu
Date: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 at 2:42 AM
To: MATPOWER discussion forum matpowe...@list.cornell.edu
Subject: Re: convergence problem
: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 at 2:42 AM
To: MATPOWER discussion forum
matpowe...@list.cornell.edumailto:matpowe...@list.cornell.edu
Subject: Re: convergence problem in runpf.
Mirish,
I couldn't help notice that you're building this model from scratch (well, from
a database) and you mentioned
Dear Jose and Shree,
Thank you very much for your guidance. I followed the step as you suggested
and runpf converged in 8 iterations. Actually there were three PQ buses
which had excessive Q demand and when I reduced the Q demand for those
buses then it converged properly.
Nice regards
Mirish
Mirish,
I couldn't help notice that you're building this model from scratch (well,
from a database) and you mentioned ***To make the problem simple I used
all buses as PQ buses except one slack bus*. This actually makes it
harder to converge, unless you have *very* accurate data on what the
Dear Mr.Shree,
Thank you very much for your help. As per your suggestion and FAQ I tried
to find out the problems.
The results I got-
1) Fast-decoupled power flow did not converge in 30 iterations.
2) By following http://www.pserc.cornell.edu/matpower/#pfconvergence I
tried to runcpf to get
...@list.cornell.edumailto:matpowe...@list.cornell.edu
Date: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 at 7:36 PM
To: MATPOWER discussion forum
matpowe...@list.cornell.edumailto:matpowe...@list.cornell.edu
Subject: Re: convergence problem in runpf.
Dear Mr.Shree,
Thank you very much for your help. As per your suggestion
I would suggest trying the following:
1. Use the solution of a fast decoupled power flow or an optimal power flow
(with line limits and voltage limits relaxed) as the initial guess for the
power flow.
2. Follow step 5 in http://www.pserc.cornell.edu/matpower/#pfconvergence
making CPF to
Dear Jose L. Marin and Dr.Zimmerman,
Thank you Mr.Jose L. Marin for your detailed explanations. I also thank
Dr.Zimmerman for giving hint in using find_islands() function.
Regards,
Babulal
On 31-10-2014 18:15, Jose Luis Marin wrote:
Hello Babulal,
I believe that the problem is
Hello Babulal,
I believe that the problem is that MATPOWER does not automatically remove
islands when running a powerflow. Each of the three contingencies you list
happen to isolate a bus, therefore the network needs to be reduced prior to
the call to runpf (Ray -- please correct me if I'm
12 matches
Mail list logo