:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Mav-user] reusable controllers and session objects
If I can take more of your time, what do you think about
multi-action controllers? For cases of related but small
in processing weight actions, it's might be appropriate to
invoke a single (static
-Original Message-
From: Valeri Sarantchouk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 6:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Mav-user] reusable controllers and session objects
If I can take more of your time, what do you think about
multi-action controllers? For cases
-user] reusable controllers and session objects
From: Valeri Sarantchouk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am trying to avoid creating new objects at every request.
Is it possible to use a servlet as a (Trhowaway2)
Controller? Or other reusable accross requests conroller.
[...]
ClientModel has
think about this. Maybe a new thread?
Eelco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Valeri
Sarantchouk
Sent: dinsdag 1 april 2003 16:23
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Mav-user] reusable controllers and session objects
Yes, sometimes I loose
of initialisation that is equal for all users and
should be done only once.
Eelco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Schnitzer,
Jeff
Sent: maandag 31 maart 2003 23:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Mav-user] reusable controllers and session objects
From: Valeri Sarantchouk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
But what about old good servlets? My simple tests comparing
chains of JavaBeans with analogous servlet filters shows
filters more performant.
I'm not sure what you mean by this - JavaBeans vs filters?
If I can take more of your time, what
!
Eelco
- Original Message -
From: Schnitzer, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 4:10 AM
Subject: RE: [Mav-user] reusable controllers and session objects
From: Eelco Hillenius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Second side note: GC can give you
Hi Jeff,
Thank you for such insightfull answer! I simply wasn't
aware of much of these inner workings.
It breaks many of my stereotypes:
1. Object pool stereotype: always create a cache of idle
objects for average number of simultaneous users.
I thought if caching of static content and
My dad can beat up your dad!
- Original Message -
From: Michael McGrady [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 2:25 AM
Subject: Re: [Mav-user] reusable controllers and session objects
I see, you meant to say I am trying to STOP applying my stuff
Sarantchouk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 10:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Mav-user] reusable controllers and session objects
Hi Eelco,
Thank you! I took a look at Maverick's source code, and
found it: I can simply subclass ControllerSingleton and
use object pools
Valeri these are just standard coding things. You essentially are asking
how to code your project. Maverick is a framework, so you can hardly apply
it to a framework-less web application. My apologies if I am not
understanding you. This is meant to be helpful.
On your coding questions, I
Hi Eelco,
Thank you! I took a look at Maverick's source code, and
found it: I can simply subclass ControllerSingleton and
use object pools from the subclass.
Cheers,
Valeri
---
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003 21:46:42
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
I am not sure that understand you well, but...
You can
I see, you meant to say I am trying to STOP applying my stuff to a
frameless application instead of I am trying to apply my stuff to a
frameless application. So, you have to see that it was not a matter of
ignorance, or knowledge, but basic communication. There is no need to get
snarky. I
13 matches
Mail list logo
