From: jim moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Maybe instead of writing a file, it would be better to be able to
specify a command (similar to reloadCommand) which dumps the current
config as a page. That way it isn't necessary to worry about where
you
can write to the filesystem, should
is
a great idea.
--jim
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Schnitzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 8:26 AM
Subject: RE: [Mav-user] problem with beta 2
Looks like Maverick doesn't think you have a controller defined. Just a
guess, but are you still
From: jim moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
yep--that's the problem. out of curiosity, why was it deprecated?
The goal was to make it easier to add controller factories in the future
without breaking backwards compatibility. One day we might want to be
able to specify a type attribute on the
jim moore wrote:
BTW, i think the idea of allowing xsl transform on the config file is
a great idea.
thanks :D
___
Mav-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mav-user
